Advertisement

Empathie pp 193-234 | Cite as

7 Empathie heeft een breed spectrum

  • Marc Hebbrecht
Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads

Samenvatting

Naast empathie en aanvaarding is authenticiteit of echtheid de meest fundamentele van de drie grondhoudingen die Rogers sinds 1957 heeft beschreven als noodzakelijk en voldoende voor constructieve persoonlijkheids-verandering. Echtheid is één aspect van de onderliggende houding van receptiviteit en openheid: openheid voor de eigen beleving en openheid voor de beleving van de patiënt (Lietaer, 2008). Echtheid in therapie betekent dat de therapeut zijn werkelijke zelf is tijdens de ontmoeting met de patiënt.

Literatuur

7.1

  1. Hebbrecht M. De psychiater als steunfiguur: Een psychoanalytische visie. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 2004a;46:157-66.Google Scholar
  2. Hebbrecht M. Narcistische thema’s en variaties. Tijdschrift voor Psychoanalyse 2004b:10:195-210.Google Scholar
  3. Hebbrecht M. Nieuwe wegen in de psychoanalyse. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 2008;34:187-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hebbrecht M. De droom: Verkenning van een grensgebied. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom; 2010.Google Scholar
  5. Hebbrecht M. Authenticiteit: Een psychoanalytische benadering. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 2014;40:184-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Klein M. Mourning and its relation to manic-depressive states. Int J Psychoanal 1940;21:125-53.Google Scholar
  7. Lietaer G. Authenticiteit en aanvaarding: voedingsbodem van het therapeutische werk. In: Lietaer G, Vanaerschot G, Snijders JA, Takens RJ, redactie. Handboek gesprekstherapie. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom; 2008. p. 49-80.Google Scholar
  8. Neri C. Authenticity as an aim of psychoanalysis. Am J Psychoanal 2008:68;325-49.Google Scholar
  9. Ogden TH The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. Int J Psychoanal 1994:75:3-19.Google Scholar
  10. Rogers CR. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. J Consult Psychol 1957;21:95-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rogers CR. Client-centered therapy. In: Arieti S, editor. American handbook of psychiatry. Vol. iii. New York: Basic Books; 1966. p. 183-200.Google Scholar
  12. Winnicott DW. The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development. London: Hogarth Press; 1965.Google Scholar

7.2

  1. Baron-Cohen S. Nul-empathie: Een theorie van menselijke wreedheid. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds; 2012.Google Scholar
  2. Basch MF. Empathic understanding: A review of the concept and some theoretical considerations. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1983;31:101-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beebe B, Lachman F. Infant research and adult treatment. New York, Analytic Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  4. Betan E, Heim A, Conklin C, Westen D. Countertransference phenomena and personality pathology in clinical practice: an empirical investigation. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162:890-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair RJ. Responding to the emotions of others: dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Conscious Cogn 2005;14:698-718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blitt SJ, Smit-Behrends. Internalization, Separation-individuation and the nature of the therapeutic action. Int J Psychoanal 1987;68:279-97.Google Scholar
  7. Block Lewis H. Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York, International Universities Press; 1971.Google Scholar
  8. Bolognini S. Empathy and ‘empathism’. Int J Psychoanal. 1997;78:279-93.Google Scholar
  9. Boston Change Process Study Group. Change psychotherapy: A unifying paradigm. New York/London: Norton; 2010.Google Scholar
  10. Dalenberg CJ. Countertransference and the treatment of trauma Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimberg U, Thunberg M, Elemehed K. Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychol Sci 2000;11:86-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferenczi S. The confusion of tongues between the adult and the child. Int J Psychoan 1932/1946:225-30.Google Scholar
  13. Ferro A. Seeds of illness, seeds of recovery. Londen, Routledge; 2005.Google Scholar
  14. Fonagy P, Gergely G, Jurist E, Target M. Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of self. New York: The Other Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  15. Gallese V. The roots of empathy: The shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basi: of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology 2003;36:171-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gutheil TG, Gabbard GO. The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: theoretical and risk-management dimensions. Am J Psychiatry 1993;150:188-96.Google Scholar
  17. Gutheil TG, Gabbard GO. Misuses and misunderstandings of boundary theory in clinical and regulatory settings. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:409-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lane RD, Garfield DA. Becoming aware of feelings: integration of cognitive developmental, neuroscientific and psychoanalytic perspectives. Neuropsychoanalysis 2005:7:5-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marsh AA, Blair RJR. Deficits in facial recognition; a meta-analysis among antisocial populations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008:32:454-65.Google Scholar
  20. Meissner SJWW. Empathy in the therapeutic alliance Psychoanalytic Inquiry 1996;16:39-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meltzoff AN. Social cognition and the origins of imitation, empathy and theory of mind. In: Goswami U, editor. The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. 2nd ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. Attachment in adulthood. Hove, Routledge; 2007.Google Scholar
  23. Nathanson DL. The empathic wall and the ecology of affect. Psychoanal Study Child, 1986;41:171-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nathanson DL A conversation with Donald Nathanson by Gil Levin [internet]. Behavor Online; 2000. http://behavior.net/2000/03/a-conversation-with-donald-nathanson/.
  25. Norcross, JC, editor. Psychotherapy relations that work. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  26. Panksepp J, Biven L. The archaeology of mind: Neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions. New York, Norton; 2012.Google Scholar
  27. Preston SD, Waal FB de. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci 2002;25:1-20.Google Scholar
  28. Safran JD, Muran CJ, Eubanks-Carter C. Repairing alliance ruptures. Psychotherapy 2011;48:80-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schore AN. Affect regulation and the origin of the self. Hillsdale (NY): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1994.Google Scholar
  30. Schore AN. The science of the art of psychotherapy. New York, Norton; 2012.Google Scholar
  31. Strien APM van. Empathie: Een kwaliteitscriterium in de psychoanalytische praktijk? Een exploratief onderzoek van een concept [proefschrift]. Amsterdam Thela Thesis; 1999.Google Scholar
  32. Tyrell CL, Dozier M, Teague GB, Falot RD. Effective treatment relationships for persons with serious psychiatric disorders: the importance of attachment states of mind. J Consult Clin Psychol, 1999;67:725-33.Google Scholar
  33. Waal F de. Een tijd voor empathie. Amsterdam/Antwerpen: Contact; 2011.Google Scholar
  34. Watson JC Facilitating empathy. Eur Psychother, 2007;7:61-76.Google Scholar
  35. Watt DF. Social bonds and the nature of empathy. J Conscious Stud 2005;12:185-209.Google Scholar

7.3

  1. Alvarez A. Live company: Psychotherapy with autistic, borderline deprived and abused children. London, Routledge; 1992.Google Scholar
  2. Beebe B, Lachman F. Infant research and adult treatment. New York, Analytic Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein A. The fear of compassion. Modern Psychoanalysis 2001;26:209-19.Google Scholar
  4. Blitt SJ, Smit-Behrends. Internalization, Separation-individuation and the nature of the therapeutic action. Int J Psychoanal 1987;68:279-97.Google Scholar
  5. Borst-Orobio de Castro S. Troost: een onbenoemde dimensie in het psychoanalytisch proces. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 1990;16:36-46.Google Scholar
  6. Brink E van den, Koster F. Compassievol leven, van mindfulness tot heartfulness. Amsterdam, Boom; 2012.Google Scholar
  7. Elliott R. Bohart AC, Watson JC, Greenberg LS Empathy. In:Norcross JC, editor. Psychotherapy relationships that work, 2nd ed. New York, Oxford University Press; 2011, p. 12-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fairbairn RD. Object-relationships and dynamic structure. Int J Psychoanal 1946;27:30-7.Google Scholar
  9. Fonagy P, Gergely G, Jurist E, Target M. Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of self. New York: The Other Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  10. Germer CK, Neff K. Self compassion in clinical practice. J Clin Psychol 2013;69:1-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilbert P. Introducing compassion focused therapy. Adv Psychiatr Treat, 2009;15:198-208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilbert P. The compassionate mind. London: Constable Robinson; 2010a.Google Scholar
  13. Gilbert P. Training our minds in, with and for compassion. London: author; 2010b. http://www.compassionatemind.co.uk/downloads/training_materials/3.%20Clinical_patient_handout.pdf.
  14. Greenberg L. Emotiegerichte therapie in de praktijk. Amsterdam. Hogrefe; 2012.Google Scholar
  15. Horton P. Language solace and transitional relatedness. Psychoanal Study Child 1984;39:167-94.Google Scholar
  16. Ladan A. Troost en illusie, Amsterdam: Boom; 1999.Google Scholar
  17. Leferink op Reinink M. Troost in de psychoanalytische psychotherapie. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 2000:1-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meins E, Fernyhough C, Johnson F, Lidstone J. Mind-mindedness in children: individual differences in internal state talk in middle childhood. Br J Dev Psychol 2006;24:181-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neff K. Selfcompassion: an alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude towards oneself. Self and Identity 2003;2:85-102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neff K. Self compassion. New York, William Morrow; 2011.Google Scholar
  21. Neff K, Germer C. A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful selfcompassion program. J Clin Psychol 2012:1-17.Google Scholar
  22. Norcross, JC, editor. Psychotherapy relations that work. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  23. Safran JD, Muran CJ, Eubanks-Carter C. Repairing alliance ruptures. Psychotherapy 2011;48:80-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schore AN. Affect regulation and the origin of the self. Hillsdale (NY): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1994.Google Scholar
  25. Schore AN. Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York, Norton; 2003.Google Scholar
  26. Strathearn L, Fonagy P, Amico J, Read Montague P. Adult attachment predicts maternal brain and oxytocine response to infant cues. Neuropsychofarmacology 2009:34:2655-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tronick E. Emotion and social communications in infants. Am Psychol 1989;44:112-9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Hebbrecht
    • 1
  1. 1.LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations