Advertisement

Cognitieve architectuur van taal en spraak

>september 1997
  • H.F.M Peters
  • R. Bastiaanse
  • J. Van Borsel
  • P.H.O. Dejonckere
  • K. Jansonius-Schultheiss
  • Sj. Van der Meulen
  • B.J.E. Mondelaers

Samenvatting

Spreken en spraakverstaan zijn processen van informatieverwerking waarin conceptuele inhouden worden omgezet in spraak en vice versa. Van oudsher hebben met name de taalkunde, met inbegrip van de fonologie en de fonetiek, en de medische wetenschappen, onder meer de foniatrie en de neurologie, zich beziggehouden met taal, spraak, communicatie en taal– en spraakpathologie.

Literatuur

  1. Abbs, J.H., & Gracco, V.L. (1984). Control of complex motor gestures: Orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of the lip during speech. Journal of Neurophysiology, 51, 705–723.Google Scholar
  2. Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155–180.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and Mind. NewYork: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, H.H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  5. Deutsch, W., & Pechmann, T. (1982). Social interaction and the development of descriptions. Cognition, 6, 155–168.Google Scholar
  6. Flores d’ Arcais, G.B., Schreuder, R., & Glazenborg, G. (1985). Semantic activation during recognition of referential words. Psychological Research, 49, 153–159.Google Scholar
  7. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fowler, C.A., Rubin, P., Remez, R.E. & Turvey M. T. (1980). Implications for speech production of a general theory of action. In B. Butterworth (ed.), Language production, Vol. i, Speech and Talk. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Garrett, M.F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (ed.), Language Production, Vol. i, Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Garrett, M.F. (1982). Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A. W. Ellis (ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gracco, V.L. (in druk). A neuromotor perspective on speech producrion. In W. Hulstijn, H.F.M. Peters, & P.H.H.M. van Lieshout (eds.), Speech production: Motor control, brain research and fluency disorders. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Kelso, J.A.S., Saltzman, E.L. & Tuller, B. (1986). The dynamical perspective on speech production: Data and theory. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 29–59.Google Scholar
  13. Kelso, J.A.S., Tuller, B., V-Bateson, E. & Fowler, C.A. (1984). Functionally specific articulatory cooperation adaptation to jaw perturbations during speech: Evidence for coordinative structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 812–832.Google Scholar
  14. Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.Google Scholar
  15. Kent, R.D., Adams, S.G. & Turner, G.S. (1996). Models of speech production. In N.J. Lass (ed.), Principles of experimental phonetics (pp. 3–45).Google Scholar
  16. Klapp, S.T., Anderson, W.G. & Berrian, R.W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading, reconsidered. Journal of Experimental psychology, 100, 368–374.Google Scholar
  17. Kolk, H. (1991).Is stuttering a symptom of adaptation or impairment? In H.F.M. Peters, W. Hulstijn & C.W. Starkweather (eds.), Speech motor control and stuttering, 131–140. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica.Google Scholar
  18. Kolk, H., & Grunsven, M. van (1985). Agrammatism as a variable phenomenon. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 347–384.Google Scholar
  19. Levelt, W. J. M. (1982). Linearization in describing spatial networks. In S. Peters & E. Saarinen (eds.), Processes, beliefs and questions. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  20. Levelt, W.J.M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104.Google Scholar
  21. Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking; From intention to articulation. Cambridge, ma: mit Press.Google Scholar
  22. Levelt, W.J.M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representation. Cognition, 42, 1–22.Google Scholar
  23. Levelt, W.J.M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269.Google Scholar
  24. Lieshout, P.H.H.M. van (1995). Motor planning and articulation in fluent speech of stutterers and nonstutterers. Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen (kun) (niciTechnical Report 95–07).Google Scholar
  25. Postma, A., Kolk, H., & Povel, D.–J. (1991). Disfluencies as resulting from covert self–repairs applied to intemal speech errors. In H.F.M. Peters, W. Hulstijn & C. W. Starkweather (eds.), Speech motor control and stuttering, 141–148. Arnsterdam: Excerpta Medica.Google Scholar
  26. Schreuder, R., Flores d’ Arcais, G.B. & Glazenborg, G. (1984). Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in semantic priming. Psychological Research, 45, 339–354.Google Scholar
  27. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. & Levelt, W. J. M. (1991). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102.Google Scholar
  28. Stemberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R.L., & Wright, C.E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G.E. Stelmach (ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117–152). NewYork; Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Verwey , W.B. (1994). Mechanisms of skill in sequential motor behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  30. Wijk, C. van, & Kempen, G. (1987). A dual system for producing self-repairs in spontaneous speech: Evidence from experimentally elicited corrections. Cognitive psychology, 19, 403–440.Google Scholar
  31. Zwitserlood, C. M. E. (1989). Words and sentences: The effects of sentential–semantic context on spoken–word recognition. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Media 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • H.F.M Peters
  • R. Bastiaanse
  • J. Van Borsel
  • P.H.O. Dejonckere
  • K. Jansonius-Schultheiss
  • Sj. Van der Meulen
  • B.J.E. Mondelaers

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations