Advertisement

Perceptuele analyse van stem

maart 1999
  • H.F.M. Peters
  • R. Bastiaanse
  • J. Van Borsel
  • P.H.O. Dejonckere
  • K. Jansonius-Schultheiss
  • Sj. Van der Meulen
  • B.J.E. Mondelaers

Samenvatting

Door zijn complexiteit is het fenomeen stem moeilijk te onderzoeken. Voor de diagnose en het behandelen van stemstoornissen vertrouwen onderzoekers (logopedisten, foniaters) doorgaans op een mengeling van objectieve metingen en subjectieve perceptuele indrukken (Blaustein & Barr, 1983). Door middel van de objectieve meetmethoden kan een bepaald deelaspect van de stem in kaart gebracht worden.

Literatuur

  1. Askenfeld, A.G., & Hammarberg, B. (1986). Speech Waveform perturbation analysis a perceptual–acoustical comparison of seven measures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 50–64.Google Scholar
  2. Baken, R.J. (1987). Clinical Measurement of speech and Voice. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Bassich, C.J., & Ludlow, C. (1986). The Use of Perceptual Methods by New Clinicians for Assessing Voice Quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 125–133.Google Scholar
  4. Blaustein, S. & Bar, A. (1983). Reliability of perceptual voice assessment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 16, 157–161.Google Scholar
  5. De Bodt, M.S., Van de Heyning, P.H., Wuyts, F.L., & Lambrechts, L. (1996). The perceptual evaluation of voice disorders. Acta Oto–rhino–laryngologica Belgica, 50, 283–291.Google Scholar
  6. De Bodt, M.S., Wuyts, F.L., Van de Heyning, P.H., & Croux, C. (1997). Test–Retest Study of the grbas Scale: the Influence of Experience and Professional Background on Perceptual Rating of Voice Quality. Journal of Voice, 11, 74–80.Google Scholar
  7. De Bodt, M.S. (1997). Een onderzoeksmodel voor stemevaluatie. De relatie tussen subjectieve en objectieve parameters in de beoordeling van de normale en pathologische stemfunctie. Dissertatie Universiteit Antwerpen.Google Scholar
  8. Dejonckere, P.H. (1995). Een multicentisch onderzoek over de perceptieve stembeoordeling: betrouwbaarheid en klinische relevantie. Conference Proceeding, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  9. Dejonckere, P.H., Remacle, M., Fresnel–Elbaz, M., Woisard, V., Crevier–Buchman, L., & Millet, B. (1996). Differential perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Revue de Laryngology Otology Rhinology, 117, 219–224.Google Scholar
  10. Fex, S. (1992). Perceptual Evaluation. Journal of Voice, 6, 155–158.Google Scholar
  11. Hammarberg, B. (1992). Pathological voice qualities. Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of a set of Swedish ‘reference’ voices. Bulletin d' Audiophonology, VIII, 39–52.Google Scholar
  12. Hirano, M. (1981). Clinical Examination of Voice. Springer Verlag: New York.Google Scholar
  13. Hirano, M. (1989). Objective Evaluation of the Human Voice: Clinical Aspects. Folia Phoniatrica, 41, 89–144.Google Scholar
  14. Hirano, M. (1990). Clinical Applications of Voice Tests. In nidcd (ed.), Assessment of Speech and Voice Production. (pp. 196–203). Maryland: nidcd.Google Scholar
  15. Hirano, M. (1993). Voice assessments procedures. Results of a decade of new developments. In I. Devranoglu (ed.), Proceedings of XV World Congress ofORL & Head and Neck Surgery 1993, Istanbul–Turkey. (pp. 588–601).Google Scholar
  16. Hiroto, I. (1967). Hoarseness. Viewpoints of voice physiology. Japanese Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 8, 9–15.Google Scholar
  17. Hollien, H., Majewski, W., & Doherty, E.T. (1982). Perceptual identification of voices under normal, stress and disguise speaking conditions. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 139–148.Google Scholar
  18. Holmgren, C.L. (1967). Physical and psychological correlates of speaker recognition. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 57–66.Google Scholar
  19. Hunter, C.D. & Manning, W.H. (1982). Listener estimations of speaker height and weight in unfiltered and filtered conditions. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 251–257.Google Scholar
  20. Isshiki, N., Yanagihara, N., & Morimoto, M. (1966). Approach to the Objective Diagnosis of Hoarseness. Folia Phoniatrica, 18, 393–400.Google Scholar
  21. Isshiki, N., Okamura, H., Tanabe, M., & Morimoto, M. (1969). Differential Diagnosis of Hoarseness. Folia Phoniatrica, 21, 9–19.Google Scholar
  22. Isshiki, N. & Takeuchi, Y. (1970). Factor Analysis of Hoarseness. Studia Phonologica, 5, 37–44.Google Scholar
  23. Kearns, G.H. & Simmons, N. (1988). Interobserver reliability and perceptual ratings: More than meets the ear. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 131–136.Google Scholar
  24. Kent, R.D. (1996). Hearing and believing: some limits to the auditory–perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 5, 7–23.Google Scholar
  25. Kersner, M. (1992). Tests of Voice, Speech and Language. London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Kooijman. P.G.C. (1995). Logopedisch perceptueel stemonderzoek. Logopedie en Foniatrie, 3, 62–69.Google Scholar
  27. Kotby, M.N., Titze, I.R., Saleh, M.M., & Berry, D.A. (1993). Fundamental frequency stability in functional dysphonia. Acta Otolaryngologica, 113, 439–444.Google Scholar
  28. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B.R., & Precoda, K. (1990). Listener Experience and Perception of Voice Quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 103–115.Google Scholar
  29. Kreiman, J., & Papcun, G. (1991). Comparing discrimination and recognition of unfamiliar voices. Speech and Communication, 10, 265–275.Google Scholar
  30. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B.R, Kempster, G.B., Erman, A., & Berke, G.S. (1993). Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality: Review, Tutorial, and a Framework for Future Research. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 21–40.Google Scholar
  31. Lass, N.J. & Davis, M. (1976). An investigation of speaker height and weight identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 700–703.Google Scholar
  32. Laver, J. (1980). The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Laver, J. Hiller, S., Mackenzie, J., & Rooney, E. (1986). An acoustic screening system for the detection of laryngeal pathology. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 517–524.Google Scholar
  34. Moran, M.J. & Gilbert, H.R. (1984). Relation between voice profile ratings and aerodynamic and acoustic parameters. Journal of communication Disorders, 17, 245–260.Google Scholar
  35. Papcun, G., Kreiman, J., & Davis, A. (1989). Long–term memory for unfamiliar voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 913–925.Google Scholar
  36. Parret, H. (1998). The aesthetic description of voice and speech quality. Handout International Symposium: Challenging Voice and Speech Disorders. Leuven, 20 maart 1998.Google Scholar
  37. Perkins, W.H. (1971). Vocal function: assessment and therapy. In L.E. Travis (ed.), Handbook of speech pathology and audiology. (pp. 505) Appleton: Century Crofts.Google Scholar
  38. Sataloff, R.T. (1996). Rational Thought: The Impact of Voice Science upon Voice Care. Journal of Voice, 9, 215–234.Google Scholar
  39. Soninnen, A. (1970). Phoniatric viewpoints on hoarseness. Acta Otolaryngologica, 263, 68–81.Google Scholar
  40. Soninnen, A. & Damsté, P.H. (1971). An international terminology in the field of logopedics and phoniatrics. Folia Phoniatrica, 23, 1–32.Google Scholar
  41. Voiers, W. (1964). Perceptual Bases of Speaker Identity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 1065–1073.Google Scholar
  42. Wilson, D.K. (1979). Voice Problems of Children. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  43. Wilson, D.K. (1987). Voice Problems of Children. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  44. Wirz, S. (1995). Assessing communication skills in diverse client groups: the role of speech and language therapy. In S. Wirz (ed.), Perceptual Approaches to Communication Disorders. (pp. 1–16). London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Wirz, S. & Mackenzie Beck, J. (1995). Assessment of voice quality: the Vocal Profiles Analysis Scheme. In S. Wirz (ed.), Perceptual Approaches to Communication Disorders. (pp. 39–55). London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Media 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • H.F.M. Peters
  • R. Bastiaanse
  • J. Van Borsel
  • P.H.O. Dejonckere
  • K. Jansonius-Schultheiss
  • Sj. Van der Meulen
  • B.J.E. Mondelaers

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations