Advertisement

Meten aan spraakproductie: instrumentele technieken

oktober 2000
  • H.F.M. Peters
  • R. Bastiaanse
  • J. Van Borsel
  • P.H.O. Dejonckere
  • K. Jansonius-Schultheiss
  • Sj. Van der Meulen
  • B.J.E. Mondelaers

Samenvatting

Het produceren van spraak is een complex gebeuren waarin verschillende processen op elkaar afgestemd moeten worden. Naast de cognitieve en linguïstische vaardigheden waarmee onze intenties in een talige structuur kunnen worden omgezet (Maassen & Van Lieshout, 1998), beschikken mensen over het vermogen om de aldus geformuleerde boodschap hoorbaar en zichtbaar te maken.

Literatuur

Meer informatie over instrumentele metingen De volgende referenties bieden algemene informatie over instrumentele technieken in spraakproductie–onderzoek:

  1. Baken, R.J. (2000). Clinical measurement of speech and voice (2nd Edition). Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, M.J., & Code, C. (1996). Instrumental clinical phonetics. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Barlow, S.M. (1999). Handbook of clinical speech physiology. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Decker, T.N. (1996). Instrumentation: An introduction for students in the speech and hearing sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Fletcher, S.G. (1992). Articulation: A physiological approach. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Hardcastle, W.J., & Laver, J. (1999). The handbook of phonetic sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Kent, R.D., & Ball, J. (2000). Voice quality measurements. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Murdoch, B.E. (1998). Dysarthria: A physiological approach to assessment and treatment. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Zemlin, W.R. (1998). Speech and hearing science: Anatomy and physiology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Referenties

  1. Abberton, E., & Fourcin, A. (1997). Electrolaryngography. In M.J. Ball & C. Code (Eds.), Instrumental Clinical Phonetics (pp. 119–148). San Diego: Singular Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Alwan, A., Narayanan, S., & Haker, K. (1997). Toward articulatory–acoustic models for liquid approximants based on mri and epg data. Part II. The rhotics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 101, 1078–1089.Google Scholar
  3. Baken, R.J. (1977). Estimation of lung volume change from torso hemicircumferences. J. Speech. Hear. Res., 20, 808–812.Google Scholar
  4. Banzett, R.B., Mahan, S.T., Garner, D.M., Brughera, A., & Loring, S.H. (1995). A simple and reliable method to calibrate respiratory magnetometers and Respitrace. J. Appl. Physiol., 79, 2169–2176.Google Scholar
  5. Baum, S.R., & McFarland, D.H. (1997). The development of speech adaptation to an artificial palate. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 102, 2353–2359.Google Scholar
  6. Binder, J.R. (1997). Neuroanatomy of language processing studied with functional mri. Clin. Neurosci., 4, 87–94.Google Scholar
  7. Binder, J.R., & Rao, S.M. (1994). Human brain mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging. In A. Kertesz (Ed.), Localization and neuroimaging in neuropsychology (pp. 185–212). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blair, C., & Smith, A. (1999). emg recording in human lip muscles: Can single muscles be isolated? J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res., 29, 256–266.Google Scholar
  9. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (1996). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer (Rep. No. 132). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  10. Borden, G.J., & Watson, B.C. (1987). Methodological aspects of simultaneous measurements: Limitations and possibilities. In H.F.M. Peters & W. Hulstijn (Eds.), Speech motor dynamics in stuttering. Wien: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Boves, L. (1991). Analysis of the acoustic speech signal for articulatory research. In H.F.M. Peters, W. Hulstijn, & C.W. Starkweather (Eds.), Speech motor control and stuttering. (pp. 199–210). Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Byrd, D., Flemming, E., Mueller, C.A., & Tan, C.C. (1995). Using regions and indices inepg data reduction. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res., 38, 821–827.Google Scholar
  13. Cavallo, S.A., & Baken, R.J. (1985). Prephonatory laryngeal and chest wall dynamics. J. Speech. Hear. Res., 28, 79–87.Google Scholar
  14. Cohn, M., Watson, H., Weisshaut, R., Stott, F., & Sackner, M. (1975). A transducer for noninvasive monitoring of respiration. In F. Stott, E. Rafferty, P. Sleigh, & L. Gouldring (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Ambulatory Monitoring (pp. 119–128). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Costello, I. (1993). Current status of stuttering and behavior modification – I: Recent trend in the application of behavior modification in children and adults. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 18, 27–55.Google Scholar
  16. Dagenais, P.A. (1995). Electropalatography in the treatment of articulation/phonological disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 28, 303–329.Google Scholar
  17. Dejonckere, P.H. (1992). Elektromyografie bij stem– en spraakstoornissen. Stem–, Spraak– en Taalpathologie, 1, 48–60.Google Scholar
  18. Dejonckere, P.H. (1996). Methoden van onderzoek binnen de foniatrie: Enkele methodologische overwegingen. Stem–, Spraak– en Taalpathologie, 5, 198–207.Google Scholar
  19. Dent, H. (1995). The application of electropalatography (epg) to the remediation of speech disorders in school–aged children and young adults. Eur. J. Disord. Commun., 30, 264–277.Google Scholar
  20. Doherty, E.T., & Shipp, T. (1988). Tape recorder effects on jitter and shimmer extraction. J. Speach. Hear. Res., 31, 485–490.Google Scholar
  21. Dolfin, T., Duffty, P., Wilkes, D.L., & Bryan, M.H. (1982). Calibration of respiratory induction plethysmography (Respitrace) in infants. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis., 126, 577–579.Google Scholar
  22. Dromey, C., & Ramig, L.O. (1998). Intentional changes in sound pressure level and rate: Their impact on measures of respiration, phonation, and articulation. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res., 41, 1003–1018.Google Scholar
  23. Fourcin, A., Abberton, E., Miller, D., & Howells, D. (1995). Laryngograph: Speech pattern element tools for therapy, training and assessment. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30, 101–115.Google Scholar
  24. Fox, P.T., Mikiten, S., Davis, G., & Lancaster, J.L. (1994). BrainMap: A database of human functional brain mapping. Functional neuroimaging: Technical foundations. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Frackowiak, R.S., & Friston, K.J. (1994). Functional neuroanatomy of the human brain: Positron emission tomography – a new neuroanatomical technique. Journal of Anatomy, 184, 211–225.Google Scholar
  26. Franken, M. (1987). Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of stuttering therapy. In H.F.M. Peters & W. Hulstijn (Eds.), Speech motor dynamics in stuttering (pp. 285–294). Wien: Springer–Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Gentil, M., Aucouturier, J.L., Delong, V., & Sambuis, E. (1994). emg biofeedback in the treatment of dysarthria. Folia Phoniatr. (Basel.), 46, 188–192.Google Scholar
  28. Gibbon, F., Hardcastle, B., & Dent, H. (1995). A study of obstruent sounds in school–age children with speech disorders using electropalatography. Eur. J. Disord. Commun., 30, 213–225.Google Scholar
  29. Hamlet, S.L., Patterson, R.L., & Fleming, S.M. (1992). A longitudinal study of vowel production in partial glossectomy patients. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 209–224.Google Scholar
  30. Hardcastle, W.J., & Gibbon, F.E. (1997). Electropalatography and its clinical applications. In M.J. Ball & C. Code (Eds.), Instrumental Clinical Phonetics (pp. 149–193). San Diego: Singular Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Hardin, M.A., Demark, D.R van, Morris, H.L., & Payne, M.M. (1992). Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate–Cranofacial Journal, 29, 340–351.Google Scholar
  32. Hoole, P., Nguyen–Trong, N., & Hardcastle, W. (1993). A comparative investigation of coarticulation in fricatives: electropalatographic, electromagnetic, and acoustic data. Lang. Speech, 36, 235–260.Google Scholar
  33. Huizenga, H.M. (1995). The statistical approach to electromagnetic source localization in the brain. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  34. Katz, W.F., Bharadwaj, S.V., & Carstens, B. (1999). Electromagnetic articulography treatment for an adult with Broca's aphasia and apraxia of speech. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 42, 1355–1366.Google Scholar
  35. Kelly, E.M., Smith, A., & Goffman, L. (1995). Orofacial muscle activity of children who stutter: A preliminary study. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res., 38, 1025–1036.Google Scholar
  36. Kelso, J.A.S., & Tuller, B. (1983). ‘Compensatory articulation’ under conditions of reduced afferent information: A dynamic formulation. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res., 26, 217–224.Google Scholar
  37. Kent, R.D. (1996). Hearing and believing: Some limits to the auditory–perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 5, 7–23.Google Scholar
  38. Kent, R.D., Dembowski, J., & Lass, N.J. (1996). The acoustic characteristics of American English. In N.J. Lass (Ed.), Principles of Experimental Phonetics (pp. 185–225). St. Louis: Mosby–Year Book Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Kertesz, A. (1994). Localization and neuroimaging in neuropsychology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lauter, J.L. (1996). Noninvasive brain imaging in speech motor control and stuttering: Choices and challenges. In W. Hulstijn, H.F.M. Peters & P.H.H.M. van Lieshout (Eds.), Speech production: Motor control, brain research, and fluency disorders (pp. 233–257). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Lieshout, P. van (1996). Technieken en methoden in spraakproductie–onderzoek. Stem–, Spraak– en Taalpathologie, 5, 173–197.Google Scholar
  42. Lieshout, P. van, Alfonso, P.J., Hulstijn, W. & Peters, H.F. (1994). Electromagnetic Midsagittal Articulography (emma). In F.J. Maarse, A.E. Akkerman, A.N. Brand, L.J.M. Mulder, & M.J. Van der Stelt (Eds.), Computers in Psychology: Applications, Methods, and Instrumentation (pp. 62–76). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  43. Lieshout, P. van, Hulstijn, W., Alfonso, P.J., & Peters, H.F. (1997). Higher and lower order influences on the stability of the dynamic coupling between articulators. In W. Hulstijn, H.F. Peters & P. van Lieshout (Eds.), Speech production: Motor control, brain research and fluency disorders (pp. 161–170). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Lieshout, P.H. van, Hulstijn, W., & Peters, H.F. (1996a). From planning to articulation in speech production: what differentiates a person who stutters from a person who does not stutter?J. Speech. Hear. Res., 39, 546–564.Google Scholar
  45. Lieshout, P.H. van, Hulstijn, W., & Peters, H.F. (1996b). Speech production in people who stutter: testing the motor plan assembly hypothesis. J. Speech. Hear. Res., 39, 76–92.Google Scholar
  46. Lieshout, P.H. van, Peters, H.F., Starkweather, C.W., & Hulstijn, W. (1993). Physiological differences between stutterers and nonstutterers in perceptually fluent speech: EMG amplitude and duration. J. Speech. Hear. Res., 36, 55–63.Google Scholar
  47. Lieshout, P.H. van, Starkweather, C.W., Hulstijn, W., & Peters, H.F. (1995). Effects of linguistic correlates of stuttering on emg activity in nonstuttering speakers. J. Speech. Hear. Res., 38, 360–372.Google Scholar
  48. Lieshout, P.H.H.M. van, Peters, H.F.M., & Hulstijn, W. (1994). Articulo–motorisch onderzoek: Een overzicht van technieken met de nadruk op electro–magnetische mediosagittale articulografie (emma). Stem–, Spraak– en Taalpathologie, 3, 241–261.Google Scholar
  49. Liotti, M., Gay, C.T., & Fox, P.T. (1994). Functional imaging and language: Evidence from positron emission tomography. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 11, 175–190.Google Scholar
  50. Ludlow, C.L. (1991). Measurement of speech motor control processes in stuttering. In H.F.M. Peters, W. Hulstijn & C.W. Starkweather (Eds.), Speech Motor Control and Stuttering (pp. 479–491). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Maassen, B., & Lieshout, P.H.H.M. van. Cognitieve architectuur van taal en spraak. In H.F.M. Peters e.a. Handboek Stem–Spraak–Taalpathologie, A2.1, 1–19. 1998. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.Google Scholar
  52. Maurer, D., Grone, B.F., Landis, T., Hoch, G., & Schonle, P.W. (1993). Re–examination of the relation between the vocal tract and the vowel sound with electromagnetic articulography (ema) in vocalization. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 7, 129–143.Google Scholar
  53. McClean, M.D., & Clay, J.L. (1995). Activation of lip motor units with variations in speech rate and phonetic structure. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res., 38, 772–782.Google Scholar
  54. McCrone, J. (1999). Going inside: A tour round a single moment of consciousness. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  55. Narayanan, S.S., Alwan, A.A., & Haker, K. (1997). Toward articulatory–acoustic models for liquid approximants based on mri and epg data. Part I. The laterals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 101, 1064– 1077.Google Scholar
  56. Peters, H.F.M., & Boves, L. (1988). Coördination of aerodynamic and phonatory processes in fluent speech utterances of stutterers. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res., 31, 352–361.Google Scholar
  57. Rabinov, C.R., Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B.R., & Bielamowicz, S. (1995). Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measures of jitter. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res., 38, 26–32.Google Scholar
  58. Rietveld, A.C.M. & Heuven, V.J. van (1997). Algemene Fonetiek. Bussum: Coutinho.Google Scholar
  59. Rietveld, A., & Lieshout, P. van (1999). Meten in de Spraak–en Taalpathologie. In: Peters, H.F.M. (ed.) Handboek Stem–Spraak–Taalpathologie, A2.1, Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.Google Scholar
  60. Stone, M. (1996). Instrumentation for the study of speech physiology. In N.J. Lass (Ed.), Principles of Experimental Phonetics (pp. 495–524). St. Louis: Mosby–Year Book.Google Scholar
  61. Titze, I.R. (1994). Towards standards in acoustic analysis of voice. Journal of Voice, 8, 1–7.Google Scholar
  62. Titze, I.R., & Winholtz, W.S. (1993). Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res., 36, 1177–1190.Google Scholar
  63. Watson, B.C., & Alfonso, P.J. (1987). Physiological bases of acoustic lrt in nonstutterers, mild stutterers, and severe stutterers. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res., 30, 434–447.Google Scholar
  64. Watson, B.C., & Dembowski, J. (1991). Instrumentation in the evaluation and modification of speech motor control during stuttering therapy. In H.F.M. Peters, W. Hulstijn, & C.W. Starkweather (Eds.), Speech Motor Control and Stuttering (pp. 503–511). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  65. Weijer, J.C. van de, & Slis, I.H. (1991). Nasaliteitsmeting met de nasometer. Logopedie en Foniatrie, 63, 97–101.Google Scholar
  66. Weismer, G., & Bunton, K. (1999). Influences of pellet markers on speech production behavior: acoustical and perceptual measures. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 105, 2882–2894.Google Scholar
  67. Wolfe, V., Cornell, R., & Palmer, C. (1991). Acoustic correlates of pathologic voice types. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res., 34, 509–516.Google Scholar
  68. Zajac, D.J., & Yates, C.C. (1997). Speech Aerodynamics. In M.J. Ball & C. Code (Eds.), Instrumental clinical phonetics (pp. 87–118). San Diego: Singular Publishing Company Inc.Google Scholar
  69. Zarahn, E., Aguirre, G., & D'Esposito, M. (1997). A trial–based experimental design for fmri. Neuroimage., 6, 122–138.Google Scholar
  70. Zierdt, A., Hoole, P., & Tillmann, H.G. (1999). Development of a system for three–dimensional fleshpoint measurements of speech movements. In J.J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville & A.C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings xivth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1–7 augustus 1999. Vol. i (pp. 73–76). American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
  71. Zundert, M. van, Rietveld, A.C.M., & Mugge, A.M. (1999). Normgegevens voor het gebruik van de nasometer bij jonge kinderen. Stem–, Spraak– en Taalpathologie V, 237–247.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Media 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • H.F.M. Peters
  • R. Bastiaanse
  • J. Van Borsel
  • P.H.O. Dejonckere
  • K. Jansonius-Schultheiss
  • Sj. Van der Meulen
  • B.J.E. Mondelaers

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations