Advertisement

Stotteren pp 187-200 | Cite as

Meten van effectiviteit van stottertherapie

augustus 2005
  • W.J. Huinck
  • A.R.T. Donders

Samenvatting

Met de komst van evidence-based handelen is effectonderzoek steeds belangrijker geworden.

Literatuur

  1. Andrews, G., & Cutler, J. (1974). Stuttering therapy: The relation between changes in symptom level and attitudes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 39, 312-9.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-47.Google Scholar
  3. Blood, G.W. (1995). A behavioral-cognitive therapy program for adults who stutter: computers and counseling. Journal of Communication Disorders, 28, 165-80.Google Scholar
  4. Bloodstein, O. (1995). A handbook on stuttering. (5th ed.). San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  5. Boberg, E. (ed.) (1981). Maintenance of f luency: An experimental program . New York: Elsevier North-Holland.Google Scholar
  6. Bray, M.A., Kehle, T.J., Lawless, K.A., & Theodore, L.A. (2003). The relationship of self-efficacy and depression to stuttering. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 425-31.Google Scholar
  7. Brutten, G.J. (1975). Stuttering: Topography, assessment and behavior change strategies. In J. Eisenson (ed.). Stuttering: A second symposium. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Brutten, G.J., & Janssen, P. (1981). A normative and factor analysis study of the responses of Dutch and American stutterers to the Speech Situations Checklist . Washington dc : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.Google Scholar
  9. Brutten, G.J., & Vanryckeghem, M. (2003). Behavior Assessment Battery (BAB). Destelbergen: sig vzw Acco.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. Conture, E.G., & Wolk, L. (1990). Stuttering. Seminars in Speech and Language, 11, 200-10.Google Scholar
  12. Craig A. (1998). Relapse following treatment for stuttering: a critical review and correlative data. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 23, 1-30.Google Scholar
  13. Craig A. (2002). Fluency outcomes following treatment for those who stutter. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 772-4.Google Scholar
  14. Craig, A., Franklin, J., & Andrews, G. (1984). A scale to measure locus of control of behaviour. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 57, 173-80.Google Scholar
  15. Curlee, R.F. (1993). Evaluating treatment efficacy for adults: Assessment of stuttering disability. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 18, 151-8.Google Scholar
  16. Dayalu, V.N., & Kalinowski, J. (2001). Re: Stuttering therapy results in pseudof luency. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 405-8.Google Scholar
  17. Dayalu, V.N., & Kalinowski, J. (2002). Pseudof luency in adults who stutter: the illusory outcome of therapy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 96.Google Scholar
  18. Eichstaedt, A., Watt, N., & Girson, J. (1998). Evaluation of the efficacy of a stutter modification program with particular reference to two new measures of secondary behaviours and control of stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 23, 231-46.Google Scholar
  19. Erikson, C.W. (1969). Assessing communication attitudes among stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 711-24.Google Scholar
  20. Finn, P. (2003a). Evidence-based treatment of stuttering: ii . Clinical significance of behavioural stuttering treatments. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 28, 209-18.Google Scholar
  21. Finn, P. (2003b). Addressing generalization and maintenance of stuttering treatment in the schools: a critical look. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 153-64.Google Scholar
  22. Foundas, A.L., Bollich, A.M., Corey, D.M., Hurley, M., & Heilman, K.M. (2001). Anomalous anatomy of speech-language areas in adults with persistent developmental stuttering. Neurology, 57, 207-15.Google Scholar
  23. Franken, M.C., Boves, L., Peters, H.F.M., & Webster, R.L. (1995). Perceptual rating instrument for speech evaluation of stuttering treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 280-8.Google Scholar
  24. Huinck, W.J., & Peters, H.F.M. (1999). Terminologie voor het beschrijven van stotteren. Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie, 8, 210-9.Google Scholar
  25. Huinck, W.J., & Peters, H.F.M. (2004). Efficacy research in stuttering therapy. A longitudinal observation of the effects of three treatment programmes . Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Huinck, W.J., Wouters, E.H.A., Hulstijn, W., & Peters, H.F.M. (2001). Differences between stuttering and non-stuttering people: Comparing diadochokinesis, sentences repetition and reaction time tasks. In B. Maassen, W. Hulstijn, R.D. Kent, H.F.M. Peters & P.H.H.M. van Lieshout (eds). Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech (p. 311-315). Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar
  27. Huinck, W.J., Lieshout, P.H.H.M. van, Peters, H.F.M., & Hulstijn, W. (2004). Gestural overlap in consonant clusters: effects on the f luent speech of stuttering and non-stuttering subjects. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 29, 3-25.Google Scholar
  28. Ingham, R.J., Gow, M., & Costello, J.M. (1985). Stuttering and speech naturalness: Some additional data. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 217-9.Google Scholar
  29. Kalinowski, A.G., Kalinowski, J., Stuart, A., & Rastatter, M.P. (1998). A latent trait approach to the development of persistent stuttering. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 1331-58.Google Scholar
  30. Kalinowski, J., Noble N., Armson, J., & Stuart, A. (1994). Naturalness ratings of the pre-treatment and post-treatment speech of adults with mild and severe stuttering. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 61-6.Google Scholar
  31. Kalinowski, J. & Dayalu, V.N. (2002). A common element in the immediate inducement of effortless, natural-sounding, fluent speech in people who stutter: ‘The second speech signal’. Medical Hypotheses, 58, 61-6.Google Scholar
  32. Langevin, M., & Boberg, E. (1993a). Comprehensive stuttering program. Logopedie en Foniatrie, 10, 262-8.Google Scholar
  33. Langevin, M., & Boberg, E. (1993b). Results of an intensive stuttering therapy program. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 17, 158-66.Google Scholar
  34. Lanyon, R.I. (1967). The measurement of stutter severity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 836-43.Google Scholar
  35. Lieshout, P.H.H.M. van, Hulstijn, W., & Peters, H.F.M. (1996). Speech production in people who stutter: Testing the motor plan assembly hypothesis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 76-92.Google Scholar
  36. McClean, M. (1990). Neuromotor aspects of stuttering: levels of impairment and disability. ASHA reports, 18, 64-70.Google Scholar
  37. Offringa, M., Assendelft, W.J.J., & Scholten, R.J.P.M. (2003). Inleiding in evidence-based medicine. Klinisch handelen gebaseerd op bewijsmateriaal. Houten: Bohn Staf leu Van Loghum.Google Scholar
  38. Onslow, M. (2001). Re: Frequency altered feedback as an alternative to ‘prolonged speech’ techniques for the control of stuttered speech. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 409-11.Google Scholar
  39. Ornstein, A., & Manning, W.H. (1985). Self-efficacy scaling by adult stutterers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 18, 313-20.Google Scholar
  40. Perkins, W.H. (1981). Measurement and maintenance of f luency. In E. Boberg (ed.). Maintenance of f luency . New York: Elsevier (p. 147-78).Google Scholar
  41. Perkins, W.H. (2001). Re: A commentary on pseudof luency. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 413-5.Google Scholar
  42. Prins, D. (1991). Theories of stuttering as event and disorder: Implications for speech production processes. In H.F.M. Peters, W. Hulstijn & C.W. Starkweather (eds). Speech motor control and stuttering . Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica (p. 571-80).Google Scholar
  43. Riley, A. (1972). A stuttering severity instrument for children and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 37, 314-22.Google Scholar
  44. Rosenthal, R., & Fode, K.L. (1963). The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat. Behavioral Science, 8, 183-9.Google Scholar
  45. Ryan, B.P., & Van Kirk Ryan, B. (1995). Programmed stuttering treatment for children: comparison of two establishment programs through transfer, maintenance and follow up. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 75.Google Scholar
  46. Sacket, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M.C., Gray, J.A.M., Haynes, R.B., & Richardson, W.S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British medical journal [Online]. Available: http://cebm.jr2.ox.ac.uk/ebmisisnt.htmGoogle Scholar
  47. Sommer, M., Koch, M.A., Paulus, W., Weiller, C., & Büchel, C. (2002). Disconnection of speech-relavan brain areas in persistent developmental stuttering. The Lancet, 360, 380-3.Google Scholar
  48. Woolf, G. (1967). The assessment of stuttering as struggle, avoidance and expectancy. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 2, 158-71.Google Scholar
  49. World Health Organisation (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
  50. World Health Organisation (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health . Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
  51. Yaruss, J.S. (1998a). Treatment Outcomes in Stuttering: Finding Value in Clinical Data. In A.K. Cordes & R.J. Ingham (eds). Treatment Efficacy for Stuttering. A Search for Empirical Bases . San Diego: Singular Publishing Group (p. 213-43).Google Scholar
  52. Yaruss, J.S. (1998b). Describing the consequences of Disorders: Stuttreing and the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 249-57.Google Scholar
  53. Yaruss, J.S. (2001). Evaluating treatment outcomes for adults who stutter. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 163-82.Google Scholar
  54. Yaruss, J.S., & Quesal, R.W. (2004). Stuttering and the international classification of functioning, disability and health (icf ): an update. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 35-52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Media 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • W.J. Huinck
    • 1
  • A.R.T. Donders
    • 2
  1. 1.Afdeling Keel-, Neus- en Oorheelkundeumc St RadboudNijmegen
  2. 2.Departement Innovatie- en MilieuwetenschappenCopernicusinstituut, Universiteit UtrechtUtrecht

Personalised recommendations