Advertisement

Afasie: symptomatologie en wetenschappelijke inzichten

september 1997
  • H.F.M Peters
  • R. Bastiaanse
  • J. Van Borsel
  • P.H.O. Dejonckere
  • K. Jansonius-Schultheiss
  • Sj. Van der Meulen
  • B.J.E. Mondelaers

Samenvatting

Afasie is een verzamelnaam voor taalstoornissen die het gevolg zijn van een beschadiging (laesie) van de hersenen. De meest opvallende symptomen van afasie doen zich voor bij het spreken. Veel voorkomende problemen zijn bijvoorbeeld het niet kunnen vinden van het juiste woord, het optreden van ‘versprekingen’ en moeilijkheden met het maken van zinnen. Daarnaast hebben afasiepatiënten vrijwel altijd moeite met het begrijpen van gesproken taal, maar deze problemen zijn in de regel minder opvallend en kunnen soms alleen met behulp van speciale tests worden aangetoond. Afasiepatiënten hebben tenslotte ook altijd moeite met lezen en schrijven en deze problemen vertonen vaak grote overeenkomst met die van respectievelijk het begrijpen en produceren van gesproken taal.

Literatuur

  1. Alexander, M.P., & LoVerme, S.R. (1980). Aphasia after left hemispheric subcortical hemorrhage. Neurology, 30, 1193–1202.Google Scholar
  2. Andral, G. (1834). Clinique médicale (3rd ed.). Paris: Fortin, Massonet Cie.Google Scholar
  3. Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1985). On consideration of method and theory governing the use of clinical categories in neurolinguistics and cognitive neuropsychology: The case against agrammatism. Cognition, 20, 97–125.Google Scholar
  4. Basso, A., Lecours, A.R., Moraschini, S., & Vanier, M. (1985). Anatomo–clinical correlations of the aphasias as defined through computerized tomography: Exceptions. Brain and Language, 26, 201–229.Google Scholar
  5. Bastiaanse, R. (1995). Categoriespecifieke stoornissen ten gevolge van hersenletsel. Stem–, Spraak– en Taalpathologie, 4, 172–189.Google Scholar
  6. Bastiaanse, R., Gilbers, D., & Linde, K. van der (1994). Sonorant substitutions in conduction and Broca's aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, 247–255.Google Scholar
  7. Bastiaanse, R., Jonkers, R. Quak, Ch., & Varela Put, M. (1996). The production of finite and nonfinite verb forms in aphasia. Brain and Language, 55, 8–11.Google Scholar
  8. Bastian, H.C. (1898). Treatise on aphasia and other speech defects. London: H.K. Lewis.Google Scholar
  9. Bay, E. (1964). Principles of classification and their influence on our concepts of aphasia. In A.V.S. de Reuck & M. O'Connor (eds.), Disorders of language. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
  10. Benson, D.F. (1967). Fluency in aphasia: Correlation with radioactive scan localization. Cortex, 3, 373–394.Google Scholar
  11. Benton A.L., & Joynt, R.J. (1960). Early descriptions of aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 3, 205–222.Google Scholar
  12. Benton, A.L. (1964). Contributions to aphasia before Broca. Cortex, 1, 314–327.Google Scholar
  13. Berndt, R.S., & Caramazza, A. (1980). A redefinition of the syndrome of Broca's aphasia: Implications for a neuropsychological model of language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 225–278.Google Scholar
  14. Binder, J.R., Frost, J.A., Hammeke, Th.A., Cox, R.W., Rao, S.M., & Prieto, Th. (1997). Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 353–362.Google Scholar
  15. Blumstein, S.E. (1973). Some phonological implications of aphasic speech. In H. Goodglass & S. Blumstein (eds.), Psycholinguistics and aphasia (pp. 123–137). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bouillaud, J. (1825). Recherches cliniques propres à démontrer que le perte de la parole correspond à la lésion des lobules antérieurs du cerveau, et à confirmer l'opinion de M. Gall, sur le siège de l'organe du langage articulé. Archives générales de Médicine, 3, t. 8, 24–45. [Ook in Hécaen & Dubois (1969), 34–53.]Google Scholar
  17. Broca, P. (1861). Remarques sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé, suivies d'une observation d'aphémie (perte de la parole). Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie, t. VI, 330–357. [Ook in Hécaen & Dubois (1969), 61–89.]Google Scholar
  18. Broca, P. (1865). Du siège de la faculté du langage articulé. Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie, 6, 377–393.Google Scholar
  19. Brownell, H.H., & Joanette, Y. (1993) (eds.). Narrative discourse in neurologically impaired and normal aging adults. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  20. Caplan, D. (1986). In defense of agrammatism. Cognition, 24, 263–276.Google Scholar
  21. Caplan, D. (1991). Agrammatism is a theoretically coherent aphasic category. Brain and Language, 40, 274–281.Google Scholar
  22. Cappa, S., & Vignolo, L. (1979). Features of aphasia following left thalamic hemorrhage. Cortex, 15, 121–130.Google Scholar
  23. Caramazza, A., & McCloskey, M. (1988). The case for single–patient study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 517–528.Google Scholar
  24. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A.E. (1991). Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature, 349, 788–790.Google Scholar
  25. Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E.B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in sentence comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–582.Google Scholar
  26. Chadwick, J., & Mann, W.N. (1950). The medical works of Hippocrates. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Charcot, J.M. (1877). Oeuvres complètes de J.M. Charcot, vol 3.: Leçcons sur les maladies du système nerveux. Paris: Delahaye & Lecrosnier.Google Scholar
  28. Code, C. (1989). Speech automatisms and recurring utterances. In Code, C. (ed.), The characteristics of aphasia (pp. 155–177). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  29. Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J.C. (eds.), (1980). Deep dyslexia. Henley–on–Thames: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
  30. Critchley, M. (1970). Aphasiology and other aspects of language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  31. Crosson, B. (1992). Subcortical functions in language and memory. New York/London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Daniele, A. Giustolisi, L., Silveri, M.C. Colosimo, C., & Gainotti, G. (1994). Evidence for a possible neuroanatomical basis for lexical processing of nouns and verbs. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1325–1341.Google Scholar
  33. Dongen, H.R. van (1988). Clinical aspects of acquired aphasia and dysarthria in childhood. Academisch Proefschrift Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  34. Ellis, A.W., & Young, A.W. (1988). Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Esposito, M. d', & Alexander, M.P. (1995). Subcortical aphasia: Distinct profiles following left putaminal hemorrhage. Neurology, 45, 38–41.Google Scholar
  36. Finger, S. (1997). Gustave Dax and the early history of cerebral dominance. Archives of Neurology, 53, 806–813.Google Scholar
  37. Flourens, P. (1842). Examen de phrénologie. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  38. Friedmann, N., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1997). Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language, 56, 397–425.Google Scholar
  39. Geschwind, N. (1972). Language and the brain. Scientific American, 226, 76–83.Google Scholar
  40. Geschwind, N. (1974). Selected papers on language and the brain. Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Compagny.Google Scholar
  41. Gilbers, D., Bastiaanse, R., & Linde, K. van der (in press). Phonological length, phonetic duration and aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics.Google Scholar
  42. Goldstein, K. (1948). Language and language disturbances. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  43. Goodglass, H. (1968). Studies on the grammar of aphasics. In S. Rosenberg & J.H. Koplin (eds.), Developments in applied psycholinguistics research (pp. 177–208). New York: The MacMillan CompanyGoogle Scholar
  44. Goodglass, H., & Hunt, J. (1958). Grammatical complexity and aphasic speech. Word, 14, 197–207.Google Scholar
  45. Goodglass, H., & Berko, J. (1960) Aphasia and inflectional morphology in English. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 3, 257–267.Google Scholar
  46. Goodglass, H., Quadfasel, F.A., & Timberlake, W.H. (1964) Phrase length and the type and severity of aphasia. Cortex, 1, 133–153.Google Scholar
  47. Goodglass, H., Gleason, J.B., & Hyde, M.R. (1970) Some dimension of language comprehension in aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13, 595–606.Google Scholar
  48. Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger [Second edition, 1983].Google Scholar
  49. Goodglass, H., & Baker, E. (1976) Semantic field, naming, and auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 359–374.Google Scholar
  50. Graetz, P., Bleser, R. de, & Willmes, K. (1992). Akense Afasie Test. Nederlandstalige versie. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  51. Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. Cambridge: mit Press.Google Scholar
  52. Grodzinsky, Y., (1991). There is an entity called agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language, 41, 555–564.Google Scholar
  53. Grodzinsky, Y., & Finkel, L. (1996). Severe grammaticality judgment deficits in agrammatism and in Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 55, 50–53.Google Scholar
  54. Haarmann, H.J., & Kolk, H.H.J. (1992). The production of grammatical morphology in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasics: Speed and accuracy factors. Cortex, 28, 97–112.Google Scholar
  55. Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Swaab, T. (1995). Semantic deficits in right hemisphere patients. Brain and Language, 28, 161–163.Google Scholar
  56. Harskamp, F. van, Visch–Brink, E.G., & Amerongen, N. van (1995). Globale afasie. Stem–, Spraak– en Taalpathologie, 4, 73–102.Google Scholar
  57. Head, H. (1926). Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Hécaen, H., & Angelergues, R. (1965). Pathologie du langage. L'aphasie. Paris: Librairie Larousse.Google Scholar
  59. Hécaen, H., & Dubois, J. (1969). La naissance de la neuropsychologie du langage 1825–1865 (textes et documents). Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  60. Jackson, J.H. (1932). Selected writings (J. Taylor, ed.). London: Hoddler & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  61. Jakobson, R. (1956). Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In R. Jakobson & M. Halle (eds.), Fundamentals of language (pp. 55–82). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  62. Joanette Y., & Brownell, H.H. (1990). (eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  63. Jong, J. de (1994). Specifieke taalstoornissen bij kinderen. Stem–, Spraak– en Taalpathologie, 3, 201–226.Google Scholar
  64. Jonkers, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (1996). The influence of instrumentality and transitivity on action naming in Broca's anomic aphasia. Brain and Language, 55, 37–39.Google Scholar
  65. Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  66. Kennedy, M., & Murdoch, B. (1989). Speech and language disorders subsequent to subcortical vascular lesion. Aphasiology, 3, 221–247.Google Scholar
  67. Kertesz, A. (1981). Evolution of aphasic syndromes. Topics in Language Disorders, 1, 15–27.Google Scholar
  68. Kertesz, A., & Sheppard, B. (1981). The epidemiology of aphasia and cognitive impairment in stroke – age, sex, aphasia type and laterality differences. Brain, 104, 117–128.Google Scholar
  69. Kleist, K. (1934). Gehirnpathologie. Leipzig: Barth:Google Scholar
  70. Kohn, S.E., & Smith, K.L. (1994). Evolution of impaired access to the phonological lexicon. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, 267–288.Google Scholar
  71. Kolk, H.H.J. (1983). Adaptatietheorie: Een nieuwe theorie voor expressieve afasie. Logopedie en Foniatrie, 55, 254–264.Google Scholar
  72. Kolk, H.H.J. (1992). Agrammatisme bij spreken en begrijpen: Drie benaderingen. Stem–, Spraak– en Taalpathologie, 1, 73–86.Google Scholar
  73. Kolk, H.H.J., & Heeschen, C. (1990). Adaptation and impairment symptoms in Broca's aphasia. Aphasiology, 4, 221–232.Google Scholar
  74. Lhermitte, F., & Gauthier, J.–C. (1969). Aphasia. In P.J. Vinken & G.W. Bruyn (eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology: Vol. 4: Disorders of speech, perception and symbolic behavior (pp. 84–104). Amsterdam: North–Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  75. Lichtheim, L. (1885). Ueber Aphasie. Deutsches Archiv für klinische Medizin, 36, 204–268.Google Scholar
  76. Links, P., Feiken, J., & Bastiaanse, R. (1996). Afasie: Diagnostiek en therapie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.Google Scholar
  77. Luria, A.R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  78. Luria, A.R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia. Its syndromes, psychology and treatment. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  79. Manning, L., & Warrington, E. (1996). Two routes to naming: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 34, 809–817.Google Scholar
  80. Marie, P. (1926). Travaux et mémoires. Tome 1. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
  81. Miceli, G., Silveri, M.C., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Variation in the pattern of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of so–called agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 36, 447–492.Google Scholar
  82. Molloy, R., Brownell, H.H., & Gardner, H. (1989). Discourse comprehension by right–hemisphere stroke patients: Deficits of prediction and revision. In Y. Joanette & H.H. Brownell (eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage: Theoretical and empirical perspective. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  83. Murdoch, B. (1996). The role of subcortical structures in language: Cliniconeuroradiological studies of brain–damaged subjects. In B. Dodd, R. Campbell & L. Worral (eds.), Evaluating theories of language. Evidence from disordered communication. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
  84. Obler, L.K., Albert, M.L., Goodglass, H., & Benson, D.F. (1978). Aphasia type and aging. Brain and Language, 6, 318–322.Google Scholar
  85. Parisi, D., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1970). Syntactic comprehension in aphasia. Cortex, 6, 204–215.Google Scholar
  86. Parrot, J.M. (1863). Atrophie complète de l'insula et de la troisième circonvolution du lobe frontal avec conservation de l'intelligence et de la faculté du langage articulé. Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie, 8, 372–401.Google Scholar
  87. Pick, A. (1913). Die agrammatische Sprachstörungen. Springer: Berlin.Google Scholar
  88. Prins, R.S. (1987). Afasie: Classificatie, behandeling en herstelverloop. Academisch proefschrift, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  89. Prins, R.S. (1990). Geschiedenis van de afasiologie. Logopedie en Foniatrie, 62, 123–129 (deel 1) en 148–155 (deel 2).Google Scholar
  90. Prins, R.S., Snow, C.E., & Wagenaar, E. (1978). Recovery from aphasia: Spontaneous speech versus language comprehension. Brain and Language, 6, 192–211.Google Scholar
  91. Rainville, P., Goulet, P., & Joanette, Y. (1995). Contribution of the right hemisphere to the processing of concrete words. Clinical Aphasiology, 23, 207–216.Google Scholar
  92. Rasmussen, T., & Millner, B. (1977). The role of early left–brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 299, 328–354.Google Scholar
  93. Rosenbek, J.C., LaPointe, L.L., & Wertz, R.T. (1989). Aphasia: A clinical approach. Austin: Pro–Ed.Google Scholar
  94. Schuell, H.M., Jenkins, J.J., & Jiménez–Pabón, E. (1964). Aphasia in adults. Diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  95. Signoret, J.–L., Castaigne, P. Lhermitte, F. Abelanet, R., & Lavorel, P. (1984). Rediscovery of Leborgne's brain: Anatomical description with ct–scan. Brain and Language, 22, 303–319.Google Scholar
  96. Sorensen, P.S., Boysen, G. Jensen, G., & Schnor, P. (1982). Prevalence of stroke in a district of Copenhagen. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 66, 68–81.Google Scholar
  97. Strauss–Hough, M., & Pierce, R.S. (1993). Contextual and thematic influence on narrative comprehension of left and right hemisphere brain–damaged patients. In H.H. Brownell & Y. Joanette (eds.), Narrative discourse in neurologically impaired and normal aging adults. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  98. Tompkins, C. (1995). Right hemisphere communication disorders: Theory and management. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  99. Trousseau, A. (1864). De l'aphasie. Clinique Médicale de l'Hôtel–Dieu de Paris, 5ième édition. Paris: Baillières, 1877. [Ook in Hécaen & Dubois (1969), 193–265.]Google Scholar
  100. Vygotsky, L.S. (1956). Thought and language. Cambridge, ma: mit Press.Google Scholar
  101. Warrington, E.K., & McCarthy, R.A. (1987). Categories of knowledge: Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain, 110, 1273–1296.Google Scholar
  102. Weiller, C., Isensee, C., Rijntjes, M., Huber, W., Müller, S., Bier, D., Dutschka, K., Woods, R.P., Noth, J., & Dienet, H.C. (1995). Recovery from Wernicke's aphasia: A positron emission tomographic study. Annals of Neurology, 37, 723–732.Google Scholar
  103. Wernicke, C. (1874). Der aphasische Symptomencomplex. Eine psychologische Studie auf anatomischer Basis. Breslau: Cohn & Weigert.Google Scholar
  104. Zurif, E.B., Caramazza, A., & Myerson, R. (1972). Grammatical judgments of agrammatic aphasics. Neuropsychologia, 10, 405–417.Google Scholar
  105. Zurif, E.B., Gardner, H., & Brownell, H.H. (1989). The case against the case against agrammatism. Brain and Cognition, 10, 237–255.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Media 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • H.F.M Peters
  • R. Bastiaanse
  • J. Van Borsel
  • P.H.O. Dejonckere
  • K. Jansonius-Schultheiss
  • Sj. Van der Meulen
  • B.J.E. Mondelaers

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations