Diagnostiek bij lage rugpijn

  • M.W. van Tulder
  • B.W. Koes


Een adequate behandeling van patiënten met lage rugpijn begint met het stellen van de juiste diagnose . De diagnose bepaalt het gewenste vervolgtraject, bijvoorbeeld geruststelling en advisering over dagelijkse activiteiten bij onschuldige acute lage rugpijn, maar ook verwijzing naar de tweede lijn voor behandeling of voor vervolgdiagnostiek bij mogelijk aanwezige ernstige pathologie.


  1. 1.
    Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA 1992; 268:760–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deyo RA, Diehl AK. Cancer as a cause of back pain: frequency, clinical presentation, and diagnostic strategies. J Gen Intern Med 1988; 3:230–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C. Autologous nucleus pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine 1993; 18:1425–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diagnostiek en behandeling van het lumbosacraal radiculair syndroom. Publicatie nr. 1999/18. Den Haag: Gezondheidsraad; 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Bleasel J, York J, Das A, McAuley JH. Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Oct; 60(10):3072–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Licata AA. Analysis of the epidemiology and risk factors of vertebral compression fractures. In: Spalski M, Gunzburg R, editors. Vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balague F, Schumacher SM, Dudler J. Natural history. In: Spalski M, Gunzburg R, editors. Vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andersson GB, Bostrom MP, Eyre DR, et al. Consensus summary on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Spine 1997; 22(24 suppl):63S–65S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO. Richtlijn aspecifieke lage rugklachten. Alphen a/d Rijn: Van Zuiden Communications; 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, Macedo LG, McAuley J, Maher C. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010 Dec; 19(12):2075–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faas A, Chavannes AW, Koes BW, Hoogen JMM van den, Mens JMA, Smeele LJM, et al. NHG-Standaard lage-rugpijn. Huisarts Wet 1996; 39:18–31.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoogen JMM van den, Koes BW, Eijck JThM van, Bouter LM. On the accuracy of history, physical examination, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in diagnosing low back pain in general practice. Spine 1995; 20:318–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deville WLJM, Windt DAWM van der, Dzaferagic A, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM. The test of Lasègue: systematic review of the accuracy in diagnosing herniated discs. Spine 2000; 25:1140–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Windt DAWM van der, Simons E, Riphagen II, Ammendolia C, Verhagen AP, Laslett M, Devillé W, Deyo RA, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW, Aertgeerts B. Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD007431. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007431.pub2.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mens JMA, Chavannes AW, Koes BW, Lubbers WJ, Ostelo RWJG, Spinnewijn WEM, Kolnaar BGM. NHG-Standaard Lumbosacraal radiculair syndroom. Huisarts Wet 2005; 48(4):171–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM. Screening for malignancy in low back pain patients: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2007 Oct; 16(10):1673–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM. A systematic review identifies five "red flags" to screen for vertebral fracture in patients with low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jarvik JG, Deyo RA. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging. Ann Int Med 2002; 137:586–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wassenaar M, van Rijn RM, van Tulder MW, Verhagen AP, van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Boer MR, Ginai AZ, Ostelo RW. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2012 Feb;21(2):220–7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2019-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rijn RM van, Wassenaar M, Verhagen AP, Ostelo RW, Ginai AZ, de Boer MR, van Tulder MW, Koes BW. Computed tomography for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2012 Feb;21(2):228–39. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2012-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marc V, Dromer C, LeGuennec P, Manelfe C, Fournie B. Magnetic resonance imaging and axial involvement in spondylarthropathies. Delineation of the spinal entheses. Rev Rheum (Engl ed) 1997; 64:465–73.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roland M, Tulder M van. Should radiologists change the way they report plain radiography of the spine? Lancet 1998; 352:348–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thornburry JR, Fryback DG, Turski PA, Javid MJ, McDonald JV, Beinlich BR, et al. Disk-caused nerve compression in patients with acute low back pain: diagnosis with MR, CT myelography and plain CT. Radiology 1993; 186:731–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jackson RP, Cain JE, Jacobs RR, Cooper BR, McManus GE. The neuroradiographic diagnosis of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus: II A comparison of computed tomography (CT), myelography, CT-myelography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 1989; 14: 1362–1367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kent DL, Haynor DR, Larson EB, Deyo RA. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a meta-analysis of the accuracy of CT, MR and myelography. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158;1135–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Janssen ME, Bertrand SL, Joe C, Levine MI. Lumbar herniated disc disease: comparison of MRI, myelography, and post-myelographic CT scan with surgical findings. Orthopedics 1994; 17:121–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bischoff RJ, Rodriguez RP, Gupta K et al (1993) A comparison of computed tomography-myelography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography in the diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus and spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6:289–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aota Y, Niwa T, Yoshikawa K et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976.) 32:896–903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chawalparit O, Churojana A, Chiewvit P et al (2006) The limited protocol MRI in diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation. J Med Assoc Thai 89:182–189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Deyo RA. Diagnostic evaluation of LBP. Reaching a specific diagnosis is often impossible. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162:1444–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kendall NAS, Linton SJ, Main CJ. Guide to assessing psychosocial yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long term disability and work loss. Wellington: Accident Rehabilitation & Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand, National Health Committee; 1997.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hurley DA, Dusoir TE, McDonough SM, et al. Biopsychosocial screening questionnaire for patients with low back pain: preliminary report of the utility in physiotherapy practice in Northern Ireland. Clin J Pain 2000; 16:214–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hurley DA, Dusoir TE, McDonough SM, et al. How effective is the acute low back pain screening questionnaire for predicting 1-year follow-up in patients with low back pain? Clin J Pain 2001; 17:256–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Linton SJ, Boersma KB. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive value of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire. Clin J Pain 2003; 19:80–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Linton SJ, Halldén K. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain. 1998 Sep; 14(3):209–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.W. van Tulder
    • 1
  • B.W. Koes
    • 2
  1. 1.AmsterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.’S-GravenhageNetherlands

Personalised recommendations