Advertisement

Cardiologie pp 361-368 | Cite as

41 Kunstkleppen

  • R. B. A. Van Den Brink
Part of the Quintessens book series (QUI)

Samenvatting

In principe wordt altijd gestreefd naar reparatie van de eigen hartklep, omdat de mortaliteit en de morbiditeit na reparatie van de eigen klep geringer zijn. Vaak is (bijvoorbeeld door uitgebreide verkalkingen) de hartchirurg toch genoodzaakt een kunstklep te implanteren.

Literatuur

  1. Bonow RO, Carabello B, Leon AC de. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1486–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brenner B. Haemostatic changes in pregnancy. Thromb Res. 2004;114:409–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brink RBA van den, Visser CA, Basart DCG, Düren DR, Jong AP de, Dunning AJ. Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal color Doppler flow imaging in patients with mechanical prostheses in mitral valve position. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:1471–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butchart EG, Gohlke-Bärwolf Ch, Antunes MJ, on behalf of the Working Groups on valvular heart disease, thrombosis, and cardiac rehabilitation and exercise physiology, European Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for the management of patients after heart valve surgery. Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology 2005. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:2463–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Briet E. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses. Circulation. 1994;89:635–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grunkemeier GL, Jamieson WRE, Miller DC, Starr A. Actuarial versus actual risk of porcine structural valve deterioration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;108:709–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Grunkemeier GL, Li HH, Naftel DC. Long-term performance of heart valve prostheses. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2000;25:74–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knott E, Reul H, Knoch M, Steinseifer U, Rau G. In vitro comparison of aortic heart valve prostheses. Part I: mechanical valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;96:952–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Otto CM. The practice of clinical echocardiography. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Pibarot Ph, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart. 2006;92:1022–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Puvimanasinghe JPA, Steyerberg EW, Takkenberg JJM, et al. Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis: predictions based on meta-analysis and microsimulation. Circulation. 2001;103:1535–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rahimtoola SH. Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:893–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Seshadri N, Goldhaber SZ, Elkayam U, et al. The clinical challenge of bridging anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves: an evidence-based comparative review focusing on anticoagulation options in pregnant and nonpregnant patients. Am Heart J. 2005;150:27–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Uebing A, Steer PhJ, Yentis SM. Pregnancy and congenital heart disease. BMJ 2006;332:401–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vink R, Kraaijenhagen RA, Hutten BA, et al. The optimal intensity of vitamin K antagonists in patients with mechanical heart valves: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:2042–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yazdanbakhsh AP, Brink RBA van den, Dekker E, Mol BAJM de. Small valve area index: its influence on early mortality after mitral valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2000;17:222–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. B. A. Van Den Brink
    • 1
  1. 1.Academisch Medisch Centrum-Universiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdam

Personalised recommendations