Advertisement

Seksuologie pp 197-213 | Cite as

8 Seks en commercie

  • Ine Vanwesenbeeck
Part of the Quintessens book series (QUI)

Samenvatting

Seks en commercie gaan hand in hand. De seksuele praktijk genereert een vraag naar allerlei producten en diensten die, bijvoorbeeld, ongewenste gevolgen van seks helpen voorkómen, lust helpen opwekken, seksuele prestaties helpen verbeteren of seksuele behoeften helpen bevredigen.

Literatuur

  1. 1.
    Agustín L. Sex at the Margins: Migration, Labour Markets and the Rescue Industry. London: Zed Books, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paul P. Pornified: How pornography is transforming our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York: Time Books, 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Parliament. Committee on Women’s Rights and Equal Opportunities, Draft report on the consequences of the sex industry in the European Union, provisional, 2003/2107 (INI) 2004; 9 January, Rapporteur M. Eriksson.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Monzini P. Sex Traffic. Prostitution, Crime and Exploitation. London/New York: Zed Books, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bakker F, Vanwesenbeeck I, redactie. Seksuele gezondheid in Nederland 2006. RNG-studies nr.9. Delft: Eburon, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hald GM, Malamuth NM. Self-Perceived Effects of Pornography Consumption. Arch Sex Behav, in press (available online).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graaf H de, Meijer S, Poelman J, Vanwesenbeeck I. Seks onder je 25e. Seksuele gezondheid van jongeren in Nederland anno 2005. RNG-studies nr.7. Delft: Eburon, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vanwesenbeeck I, de Graaf H, Meijer S, Poelman J. Een update over het seksuele gedrag en de seksuele gezondheid van jongeren in Nederland: De belangrijkste bevindingen uit ‘Seks onder je 25e’. Tijdschr Seksuologie 2006;30:57–64.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weitzer R, editor. Sex for sale: Prostitution, pornography and the sex industry. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bailey JM, Gaulin S, Agyei Y, Gladue BA. Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionary relevant aspects of humanmating psychology. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;66:1081–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vanwesenbeeck I. Psychosexual correlates of viewing sexually explicit sex on television among women in the Netherlands. J Sex Res 2001;38:361–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malamuth NM, Addison T, Koss M. Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Ann Rev Sex Res 2000;11: 26–91.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malamuth NM, Huppin M. Pornography and teenagers: The importance of individual differences. Adolescent Medicine 2005;16:315–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vega V, Malamuth NM. The role of pornography in the context of general and specific risk factors. Aggressive Behav 2007;33:104–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zillman D, Bryant J. Effects of massive exposure to pornography. In: Malamuth, NM, Donnerstein E, editors. Pornography and sexual aggression. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press, Inc, 1984:115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abramson PR, Hayashi H. Pornography in Japan: Cross-cultural and theoretical considerations. In: Malamuth NM, Donnerstein E, editors. Pornography and sexual aggression. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press, Inc, 1984:173–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peter J, Valkenburg PM. Adolescents’ Exposure to a Sexualized Media Environment and Their Notions of Women as Sex Objects. Sex Roles 2007;56:381–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hawk ST, Vanwesenbeeck I, Graaf H de, Bakker F. Adolescents’ contact with sexuality in mainstream media: A selection-based perspective. J Sex Res 2006;43:352–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualisation of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualisation of Girls. Washington: American Psychological Association. Retrieved February 22, 2007 from www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html.
  20. 20.
    Lerum K, Dworkin S. ‘Bad Girls Rule’: An interdisciplinary feminist commentary on the report of the APA Task force on the Sexualisation of Girls. J Sex Res 2009; in press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harcourt C, Egger S, Donovan B. Sex work and the law. Sexual Health 2005;2:121–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Daalder AL. Prostitutie in Nederland na opheffing van het bordeelverbod. Den Haag: WODC, 2007.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Vanwesenbeeck I. Another decade of social scientific work on sex work: A review of research 1990–2000. Ann Rev Sex Res 2001;12:242–90.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abramovich E. Childhood Sexual Abuse as a Risk Factor for Subsequent Involvement in Sex Work: A Review of Empirical Findings. J Psychology Hum Sexuality 2005;17:131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bernstein E. Sex Work for the Middle Classes. Sexualities 2007;10:473–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sanders T. Sex Work: a Risky Business. Devon: Willan Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Svedin CG, Priebe G. Selling Sex in a Population-Based Study of High School Seniors in Sweden: Demographic and Psychosocial Correlates. Arch Sex Behav 2007;36:21–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kinnell H, Praats C. A regional survey of sex work characteristics and policy change in Belgium, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and the UK: a report from the Central Regional European Network for HIV/STD Prevention in Prostitution, Ed, 2002.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Venicz L, Vanwesenbeeck I. Aard en omvang van (dwang tot) prostitutie onder minderjarige (allochtone) meisjes. Utrecht/Den Haag: Nisso/Ministerie van Justitie, 1998.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vanwesenbeeck I. Burnout among Female Indoor Sex Workers. Arch Sex Behav 2005;34:27–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gianotten WL, Meihuizen-de Regt MJ, Van Son-Schoones N, redactie. De zorgafhankelijke en alleenstaande volwassene en seksualiteit bij ziekte en lichamelijke beperking. Assen, Van Gorcum, 2008;597–605.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stichting Farmaceutische Kengetallen (SFK). Erectiemiddelen: de rek is eruit. Pharmaceutisch Weekblad 2006;144(33), sfk.nl/sfksite/publicaties/farmacie_in_cijfers/2006/2006–33, opgehaald 22–01–2009.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tiefer L. Sexology and the pharmaceutical industry: The threat of co-optation. J Sex Res 2000;37:273–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tiefer L. The Viagra Phenomenon. Sexualities 2006; 9:273–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kaschak E, Tiefer L, editors. A new view of women’s sexual problems. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc, 2001.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Moynihan R. The making of a disease: female sexual dysfunction. BMJ 2003;326:45–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Uitgeverij 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ine Vanwesenbeeck
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutgers Nisso Groep (RNG), Kenniscentrum Seksualiteit, UtrechtUtrecht

Personalised recommendations