Advertisement

Seksuologie pp 45-67 | Cite as

3 Wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar seksualiteit

  • Jacques van Lankveld
  • Ellen Laan
Part of the Quintessens book series (QUI)

Samenvatting

De eerste pogingen om menselijke seksualiteit te bestuderen met methoden die enigszins vergelijkbaar zijn met wat nu gebruikelijk is dateren uit de negentiende eeuw; parallel aan de wetenschappelijke professionalisering van de medische wetenschap en het op de achtergrond raken van de rol van religie.

Literatuur

  1. 1.
    Weis DL The use of theory in sexuality research. J Sex Res 1998;35:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ford CS, Beach FA. Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper & Row, 1951.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeLamater JD, Hyde JS. Essentialism versus social constructionism in the study of human sexuality. J Sex Res 1998;35(1):10–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bailey JM, Pillard RC. A genetic study ofmale sexual orientation. Arch Gen Psychiat 1991;48:1089–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gagnon JH, Simon W. Sexual conduct. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Groot AD. Methodologie. Grondslagen van onderzoek en denken in de gedragswetenschappen. ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co, 1961.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Masters W, Johnson V. The human sexual response. Boston: Little, Brown, 1966.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000;26:191–208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meuleman EJ, Donkers LH, Robertson C et al. Erectiestoornis: prevalentie en invloed op de kwaliteit van leven; het Boxmeer-onderzoek. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001;145:576–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandfort TGM, De Graaf R, Bijl RV. Same-sex sexuality and quality of life: Findings from the Netherlands Mental Health survey and incidence study. Arch Sex Behav 2003;32:15–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laan E, Van Driel E, Van Lunsen RHW. Seksuele reacties van vrouwen met een seksuele opwindingsstoornis op visuele seksuele stimuli. Tijdschr Seksuol 2003;27:1–13.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Slob AK, Koster J, Radder JK, et al. Sexuality and psychophysiological functioning in women with diabetes mellitus. J Sex Marital Ther 1990;16:59–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heiman JR, Meston CM. Empirically validated treatment for sexual dysfunction. Ann Rev Sex Res 1997;8:148–94.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laan E, Van Lunsen RHW. Seks en farmaca. Tijdschr Seksuol 2002;26:253–62.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kazdin AE. Research design in clinical psychology (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cook TD, Campbell DT. The design and conduct of quasi-experiments and true experiments in field settings. In: Dunnette MD, editor. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hersen M, Barlow DH. Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Onghena P, Edgington ES. Randomization tests for restricted alternating treatments designs. Behav Res Ther 1994;32:783–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosen RC, Leiblum SR. Treatment of sexual disorders in the 1990s: An integrated approach. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:877–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Souverein PC, Egberts AC, Meuleman EJ, et al. Incidence and determinants of sildenafil (dis)continuation: the Dutch cohort of sildenafil users. Int J Imp Res 2002;14:259–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ernst C, Foldenyi M, Angst J. The Zurich Study: XXI Sexual dysfunctions and disturbances in young adults. Data of a longitudinal epidemiological study. Eur Arch Psychiat Clin Neurosci 1993;243:179–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wiegel MA, Scepkowski LA, Barlow DH. Cognitiveaffective processes in sexual arousal and sexual dysfunction. In E. Janssen (Ed.). The psychophysiology of sex (pp.143–165). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Laan E, Everaerd W, Van Berlo R, et al. Mood and sexual arousal in women. Behav Res Ther 1995;33: 441–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Daker-White G. Reliable and valid self-report outcome measures in sexual (dys)function: A systematic review. Arch Sex Behav 2002;31:197–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hays RD, Anderson RT, Revicki D. Assessing the reliability and validity of measurements in clinical trials. In: Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM, editors. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methods and practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998:169–82.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Conte HR. Development and use of self-report techniques for assessing sexual functioning: A review and critique. Arch Sex Behav 1983;12:555–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vroege JA. De Vragenlijst voor het Signaleren vanSeksuele Dysfuncties (VSD). Bruikbaarheid in de klinische praktijk. Delft: Eburon, 2003.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959;56:85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rassin E. De waarde van het woord. Over het belang van zelfrapportages voor de psychologie. Psychol 2004;39:10–16.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Damasio AR. Looking for Spinoza. Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Orlando: Harcourt, 2003.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Loftus EF. Creating false memories. Sci Am 1972;77: 50–5.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schwarz N. Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 1999;54:93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Everaerd W. Het psychofysiologisch laboratorium en seksuele disfuncties. Tijdschr Seksuol 2003;27: 83–7.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rosen RC, Beck JG. Patterns of sexual arousal. New York: Guilford Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wolpe J. Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Oxford: Stanford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barlow DH. Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986;54:140–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Janssen E. Psychophysiological measurement of sexual arousal. In: Wiederman MW, Whitley BE, editors. Handbook for conducting research on human sexuality. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002:139–71.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hamann S, Herman RA, Nolan CL, et al. Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nat Neuroscience 2004;7:411–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chivers ML, Bailey JM. A sex difference in features that elicit genital response. Biol Psychol 2005;70:115–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Laan E, Everaerd W. Determinants of female sexual arousal: Psychophysiological theory and data. Ann Rev Sex Res 1995;6:32–76.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Laan E, Janssen E. ‘Beleefde seks’: Determinanten van seksuele gevoelens. Psychol 2002;37:370–6.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Laan E, Everaerd W, Van Aanhold M, et al. Performance demand and sexual arousal in women. Behav Res Ther 1993;31:25–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wolchik SA, Spencer SL, Lisi IS. Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav 1983;12:399–408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Goldstein I, Lue TF, Padma-Nathan H, et al. Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1397–404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tiefer L. The medicalization of sexuality: Conceptual, normative, and professional issues. Ann Rev Sex Res 1996;7:252–82.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Basson R, Weijmar Schultz WCM, Binik YM, et al. Women’s sexual desire and arousal disorders and sexual pain. In: Basson R, Rosen R, Khoury S, editors. Second international consultation on sexual medicine: Men’s and women’s sexual dysfunction. Paris: Health Publications Limited, in druk.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Plaud JJ, Gaither GA, Hegstad HJ, et al. Volunteer bias in human psychophysiological sexual arousal research: To whom do our research results apply? J Sex Res 1999;36:171–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Farkas GM, Sine LF, Evans IM. Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav 1978;7:513–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Trivedi N, Sabini J. Volunteer bias, sexuality, and personality. Arch Sex Behav 1998;27:181–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Heiman JR, Schloredt KA. Ethical and cultural concerns in sexual function assessment. Int J Imp Res 1998;10(S2):S134-S137.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Friedman LS, Richter ED. Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:51–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wiederman MW. Institutional Review Boards and conducting sexuality research. In: Wiederman MW, Whitley BE, editors. Handbook for conducting research on human sexuality. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002:479–504.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Veenhoven R. Bevrijde seks: tijd, cultuur en geluk. Psychol 2002;37:377–82.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Cognitions, emotions, and sexual response: analysis of the relationship among automatic thoughts, emotional responses, and sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav. 2008;37(4):652–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sand MS, Fisher W, Rosen R, Heiman J, Eardley I. Erectile dysfunction and constructs of masculinity and quality of life in the multinational Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study. J Sex Med. 2008;5(3):583–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sidi H, Naing L, Midin M, Nik Jaafar NR. The Female Sexual Response Cycle: Do Malaysian Women Conform to the Circular Model? J Sex Med. 2008;5:2359–2366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Uitgeverij 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques van Lankveld
    • 1
  • Ellen Laan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Psychological ScienceMaastricht UniversityEindhoven
  2. 2.Afdeling Seksuologie & Psychosomatische Gynaecologie, Divisie Verloskunde/Gynaecologie, Academisch Medisch CentrumUniversiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdam

Personalised recommendations