Advertisement

Nekpijn

  • C. J. Vos
  • A. P. Verhagen
  • G. P. H. Hermans

Nekpijn is pijn ervaren in het gebied dat aan de bovenkant begrensd wordt door het occiput, aan de laterale zijden door de musculi trapezii en aan de onderzijde door een horizontale lijn door de spinae scapulae. Wat nekpijn is en waar dat gelokaliseerd moet worden is zowel voor patiënt als dokter eigenlijk direct duidelijk.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatuur

  1. 1.
    Gore DR, Gardner GM et al. Neck pain; a long-term follow-up of 205 patients. Spine 1987; 12: 1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Binder A. Neck pain. Clin. Evidence 2002; 7: 1049–1062Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoving JL. Neck pain in primary care; the effect of commonly applied interventions. Proefschrift Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit; 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ariens GAM, Borghouts JAJ, Koes BW. Neck pain, Crombic IK, Epidemiology of Pain. IASP Press; Seattle; 1999: 235–255Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bogduk N. The neck. Baillière’s Clinical Rheumatology 1999; 13: 261–285Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Croft PR, Lewis M, Papageorgiou AC et al. Risk factors for neck pain: a longitudinal study in the general population. Pain 2001; 93: 317–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guez M, Hildingsson C, Stegmayr B, et al. Chronic neck pain of traumatic and non-traumatic origin. A population based study. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74: 576–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borghouts JAJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neckpain. Pain 1998; 77: 1–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linden MW van der, Westert GP, Bakker DH de, et al. Tweede Nationale Studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk: klachten en aandoeningen in de bevolking en in de huisartspraktijk. Utrecht, Bilthoven: NIVEL/RIVM; 2004Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heijmans WFGJ, Lutke Schipholt HJA, Evers JWH, et al. Neck disability index. Ned Tijdschr Fysiother 2002; 112: 94–99Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index; a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991; 14: 409–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cote P, Cassidy JD, Caroll L. The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey. Spine 1998; 23: 1689–1698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weel C van. Rugklachten in de huisartsenpraktijk. Huisarts Wet 1983; 26: 5–8Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodanov BP, Begre S, Sturzenegger M. Predicting recovery from common whiplash. Eur Neurol; 36: 48–51Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scholten-Peters GGM. Whiplash and its treatment. Thesis. Radboud Univ. Nijmegen; 2004.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vos CJ, Hermans GPH, Schmickli SL. Whiplash: een hardnekkig probleem. Den Haag: Onderzoeksverslag Whiplash Centrum Nederland; 2002.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okkes IM, Oskam SK, Lamberts H. Van klacht naar diagnose. Episodegegevens uit de huisartspraktijk Bussum: Coutinho; 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jenkner FL. Das Cervicalsyndrom. Wien: Springer Verlag; 1982.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnson MJ, Lucas GL. Value of cervical spine radiographs as a screening tool. Clinic Orthop. 1992; 340: 102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part 2. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord 1992; 5: 390–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson H, Bring G, Rausching W. Hidden cervical spine injuries in traffic accident victims with skull fractures. J Spinal Disord 1991; 4: 251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kinesota H. Pathology of cervical intervertebral disc injuries. Paraplegia 1993; 31: 553–559Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Taylor JR, Twomey LT. Acute injuries to the cervical joints; an autopsy study of neck sprain. Spine 1993; 18: 1115–1122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kriss TC, Kriss VM. Neck pain. Primary care work-up of acute and chronic symptoms. Geriatrics 2000; 55: 47–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gijn J van. Pijn in de arm met tintelende wijs- en middelvinger; discusprolaps. NTvG 1989; 133: 1529–1531Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Million R. Neck pain: considerations for the GP. Practitioner 1988; 232: 1208–1211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders. Spine 1995; 20: 1S-73S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Friedberg ZB, Miller MT. Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. JBJS 1963; 45; 1171–1178Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zapletal J, Hekster R, Straver EM et al. The relationship between atlanto-odontoid osteoarthritis and idiopathic suboccipital neck pain. Neuroradiology 1996; 38: 62–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dwyer A, April C, Bogduk N. Cervical zygapophyseal joint pain patterns. A study in normal volunteers. Spine 1990; 15: 453–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sjaastad O, Frederiksen TA. Cervicogenic headache: Diagnostic Criteria. Headache 1998; 38: 442–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hagen KB, Harms K, Enger N, et al., Relationship between subjective neck disorders and cervical spine mobility and motion-related pain in male machine operators. Spine 1997; 22: 1501–1507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Turk DC. Rehabilitation and back-to-work program (Verslag Whiplashcongres). Bern; 2001.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 2000; 85: 317–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tong HC, Haig AJ, Yamakawa K. The Spurling test and cervical radiculopathy. Spine 2002; 27: 156–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Grubb SA, Kelly CK. Cervical discography. Spine 2000; 25: 1382–1389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. J. Vos
  • A. P. Verhagen
    • 1
  • G. P. H. Hermans
  1. 1.Afdeling HuisartsgeneeskundeErasmus Medisch Centrum RotterdamRotterdam

Personalised recommendations