Advertisement

Which Material and Device? The Choice of PICC

  • Enrico de LutioEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Until a few years ago, the PICCs were typically “silicone catheters.”

In the last 10 years, new and promising materials like polyurethanes have been made available with new and interesting features for medical applications.

It is therefore clear that with the growth of knowledge and use of PICCs, there is an increasing interest in understanding more about such materials.

This chapter talks about differences in the materials used for PICC catheters. The materials are seen with regard to their physical and chemical properties and their implication in the clinical setting. The new materials are mentioned too.

The chapter ends with final recommendations for PICC users.

Keywords

Hard Segment Soft Segment Flexural Modulus Catheter Occlusion Silicone Catheter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE (2013) Biomaterials science. An introduction to materials in medicine. Academic Press (an imprint of Elsevier), AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kipping FS (1904) Organic derivative of silicon. Preparation of alkysilicon chlorides. Proc Chem Soc 20:15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Di Fiore A. (2007), Polyurethanes in vascular access: clinical perspectives. 21st annual AVA conference, Phoenix, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Degarmo EP, Black JT, Kohser RA (2003) Materials and processes in manufacturing, 9th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith WF, Hashemi J (2006) Foundations of materials science and engineering, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Williams DF (1999) The Williams dictionary of Biomaterials. Liverpool University Press, LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 32nd Edition, Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams DF (2008) On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 29(20):2941–2942Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Phil Triolo (2005) RAC material properties of polyurethane and silicone catheters: effects on catheter performance vascular access. Workshop Bambino Gesù Hospital, Rome, April 2005Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fischer D, Knobf M, Durivage H (1997) The cancer chemotherapy handbook. Mosby, St. Louis, p 514Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crnich CJ (2005) The effects of prolonged ethanol exposure on the mechanical properties of polyurethane and silicone catheters used for intravascular access. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26(8):708–714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Amelia (TR)Italy

Personalised recommendations