Operating Theater Setup
Abstract
The surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures should be carefully prepared. This involves knowing the patient’s medical history, performing the appropriate preoperative instrumental examinations (X-ray, CT scan with 3D reconstruction), discussing the case with the team, and obtaining the proper informed consent. Even after adequate preoperation planning, be ready to modify the therapeutic strategy in the operating theater : in case an osteosynthesis cannot be performed, it is important to have more than one type of fixation device, as well as a partial prosthesis. The patient’s surgical position varies depending on the type of surgery (beach-chair vs supine). The team (surgeons, anesthesiologist, surgical technicians) should place itself in order to work efficiently. The surgical site must be accurately prepared, ensuring that the operating field is as aseptic as possible, and that the shoulder’s mobility is not compromised. It is important to also plan antibiotic prophylaxis (third-generation cephalosporin or vancomycin) and, if necessary, thromboprophylaxis. In addition to standard antiseptic precautions, the axilla should also be thoroughly washed before surgery. When performing an osteosynthesis, the image intensifier needs to be positioned in the correct place (contralateral to the limb undergoing the operation). Following a surgical safety checklist is fundamental in order to minimize the risk of errors.
Keywords
Brachial Plexus Image Intensifier Proximal Humeral Fracture Humeral Diaphysis Coracoid ProcessReferences
- 1.Blonna D, Barbasetti N, Banche G, Cuffini AM, Bellato E, Massè A, Marenco S, Battiston B, Castoldi F (2014) Incidence and risk factors for acute infection after proximal humeral fractures: a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(4):528–35Google Scholar
- 2.Yamamoto T, Tamai K, Akutsu M, Tomizawa K, Sukegawa T, Nohara Y (2013) Pulmonary embolism after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a case report. Case Rep Orthop 2013:801752PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 3.Edgar R, Nagda S, Huffman R, Namdari S (2012) Pulmonary embolism after shoulder arthroscopy. Orthopedics 35:e1673–e1676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Garofalo R, Notarnicola A, Moretti L, Moretti B, Marini S, Castagna A (2010) Deep vein thromboembolism after arthroscopy of the shoulder: two case reports and a review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:65PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.Edelson G, Kelly I, Vigder F, Reis ND (2004) A three-dimensional classification for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:413–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hertel R (2005) Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S65–S72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Magovern B, Ramsey ML (2008) Percutaneous fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 39:405–416, vPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Porcellini G, Campi F, Paladini P, Rossi P, Lollino N (2008) Informed consent in shoulder surgery. Chir Organi Mov 91:103–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Lee SU, Jeong C, Park IJ (2012) Arthroscopic fixation of displaced greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:378–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ji JH, Moon CY, Kim YY, Shafi M (2009) Arthroscopic fixation for a malunited greater tuberosity fracture using the suture-bridge technique: technical report and literature review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1473–1476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Wang YP, Zhao JZ, Huangfu XQ et al (2012) Arthroscopic reduction and fixation for isolated greater tuberosity fractures. Chin Med J (Engl) 125:1272–1275Google Scholar
- 12.Gartsman GM, Taverna E, Hammerman SM (1999) Arthroscopic treatment of acute traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation and greater tuberosity fracture. Arthroscopy 15:648–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Soete PJ, Clayson PE, Costenoble VH (1999) Transitory percutaneous pinning in fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:569–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fenichel I, Oran A, Burstein G, Perry Pritsch M (2006) Percutaneous pinning using threaded pins as a treatment option for unstable two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus: a retrospective study. Int Orthop 30:153–157PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Seyhan M, Kocaoglu B, Nalbantoglu U, Aydin N, Guven O (2012) Technique of Kirschner wire reduction and fixation of displaced two-part valgus angulated proximal humerus fractures at the surgical neck. J Orthop Trauma 26:e46–e50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Resch H, Hübner C, Schwaiger R (2001) Minimally invasive reduction and osteosynthesis of articular fractures of the humeral head. Injury 32(Suppl 1):SA25–SA32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Yu Z, Zheng L, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Ma B (2010) Functional and radiological evaluations of unstable displaced proximal humeral fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning fixation. Eur Surg Res 45:138–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Williams GR, Wong KL (2000) Two-part and three-part fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Orthop Clin North Am 31:1–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Resch H, Povacz P, Fröhlich R, Wambacher M (1997) Percutaneous fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:295–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Carbone S, Tangari M, Gumina S, Postacchini R, Campi A, Postacchini F (2012) Percutaneous pinning of three- or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients in poor general condition: MIROS® versus traditional pinning. Int Orthop 36:1267–1273PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kamineni S, Ankem H, Sanghavi S (2004) Anatomical considerations for percutaneous proximal humeral fracture fixation. Injury 35:1133–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ, Brennan TA (1999) The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 126:66–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD (2002) Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care 14:269–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kwaan MR, Studdert DM, Zinner MJ, Gawande AA (2006) Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. Arch Surg 141:353–357; discussion 357–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Seiden SC, Barach P (2006) Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events: are they preventable? Arch Surg 141:931–939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Cowell HR (1998) Wrong-site surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.NHS National Patient Safety Agency (2011) Never events: wrong site surgery. http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/collections/never-events/. Accessed 8 Jan 2013
- 28.American College of Surgeons (2002) Statement on ensuring correct patient, correct site, and correct procedure surgery. Bull Am Coll Surg 87:12Google Scholar
- 29.World Health Organization (2009) WHO guidelines for safe surgery. Safe surgery saves lives. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 30.National Patient Safety Agency and Royal College of Surgeons of England (2005) Patient briefing-correct site surgery. http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/publications/docs/patient_briefing.html/?searchterm=patient%20safety. Accessed 25 Jan 2008
- 31.Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Michaels RK, Makary MA, Dahab Y et al (2007) Achieving the National Quality Forum’s “Never Events”: prevention of wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong patient operations. Ann Surg 245:526–532PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar