Riassunto
Le applicazioni dell’uso del mezzo di contrasto (mdc) di II generazione in ambito puramente renale riguardano le seguenti patologie: ischemica, traumatica, flogistica ed espansiva (comprendendo in quest’ultima sia le formazioni di aspetto cistico che quelle solide).
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliografia
- 1.Siracusano S, Bertolotto M, Ciciliato S et al (2011) The current role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging in the evaluation of renal pathology. World J Urol 29:633–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bertolotto M, Martegani A, Aiani L et al (2008) Value of contrastenhanced ultrasonography for detecting renal infarcts proven by contrast enhanced CT-a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 18:376–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Nicolau C, Ripollés T (2011) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abdominal imaging. Abdom Imaging 37:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Setola SV, Catalano O, Sandomenico F, Siani A (2007) Contrastenhanced sonography of the kidney. Abdom Imaging 32:21–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Piscaglia F, Nolsøe C, Dietrich CF et al (2012) The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 33:33–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Valentino M, Serra C, Zironi G et al (2006) Blunt abdominal trauma: emergency contrast-enhanced sonography for detection of solid organ injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1361–1367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Regine G, Atzori M, Miele V et al (2007) Second-generation sonographic contrast agents in the evaluation of renal trauma. Radiol Med 112:581–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Valentino M, Ansaloni L, Catena F et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma: considerations after 5 years of experience. Radiol Med 114:1080–1193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), update 2008. Ultraschall Med 29:28–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Sebastia C, Quiroga S, Boyè R et al (2001) Helical CT in renal transplantation: normal findings and early and late complications. Radiographics 21:1103–1117PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Allan PL, Dubbins PA, Pozniak MA et al (2006) Doppler ultrasound evaluation of transplantation. In: Allan PL, Dubbins PA, Pozniak MA et al (eds) Clinical doppler ultrasound, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 12.Brown ED, Chen MY, Wolfman NT et al (2000) Complications of renal transplantation: evaluation with US and radionuclide imaging. Radiographics 20:607–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Akbar SA, Jafri SZ, Amendola MA et al (2005) Complications of renal transplantation. Radiographics 25:1335–1356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Wilson SR, Burns PN (2010) Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role? Radiology 257:24–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Quaia E (2007) Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update. Eur Radiol 17:1995–2008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Schwenger V, Korosoglou G, Hinkel UP et al (2006) Real-time contrast-enhanced sonography of renal transplant recipients predicts chronic allograft nephropathy. Am J Transplant 6:609–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Fontanilla T, Minaya J, Cortes C et al (2011) Acute complicated pyelonephritis: contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 18.Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Colleselli D et al (2008) Acute pyelonephritis: comparison of diagnosis with computed tomography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. BJU Int 101:341–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Prakash A, Tan GJ, Wansaicheong GK (2011) Contrast enhanced ultrasound of kidneys. Pictorial essay. Med Ultrason 13:150–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Gerst S, Hamm LE, Li D et al (2011) Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:897–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Ignee A, Straub B, Schuessler G et al (2010) Contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses. World J Radiology 2:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Quaia E, Bussani R, Cova M et al (2005) Radiologic-pathologic correlations of intratumoral tissue components in the most common solid and cystic renal tumors. Pictorial review. Eur Radiol 15:1734–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Xu HX (2009) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the evolving applications. World J Radiology 1:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Siracusano S, Quaia E, Bertolotto M et al (2004) The application of ultrasound contrast agents in the characterization of renal tumors. World J Urol 22:316–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Jiang J, Chen Y, Zhou Y, Zhang H (2010) Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: contrast-enhanced ultrasound features relation to tumor size. Eur J Radiol 73:162–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Wink MH, de la Rosette JJ, Laguna P et al (2007) Ultrasonography of renal masses using contrast pulse sequence imaging: a pilot study. J Endourol 21:466–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Xu ZF, Xu HX, Xie XY et al (2010) Renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma: differential diagnosis with real time contrast enhanced ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 29:709–717PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Fan L, Lianfang D, Jinfang X et al (2008) Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in solid renal parenchymal lesions with maximum diameters of 5 cm. J Ultrasound Med 27:875–885PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Roy C, Gengler L, Sauer B, Lang H (2008) Role of contrast enhanced US in the evaluation of renal tumors. J Radiol 89:1735–1744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Tamai H, Takiguchi Y, Oka M et al (2005) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of solid renal tumors. J Ultrasound Med 24:1635–1640PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Xu ZF, Xu HX, Xie XY et al (2010) Renal cell carcinoma: real time contrast enhanced ultrasound findings. Abdom Imaging 35:750–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Zimbaro G et al (2007) Complex cystic renal masses: characterization with contrast-enhanced. Radiology 243:158–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Nicolau C, Bunesch L, Sebastia C (2011) Renal complex cysts in adults: contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 36:742–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Park BK, Kim B, Kim SH et al (2007) Assessment of cystic renal masses based on Bosniak classification: comparison of CT and contrast-enhanced US. Eur J Radiol 61:310–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Israel GM, Bosniak MA (2005) How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiology 236:441–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Cioffi V et al (2008) Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography with unenhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses. Am J Roentgenol 191:1239–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Clevert DA, Minaifar N, Weckbach S et al (2008) Multislice computed tomography versus contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of complex cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification system. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 39:171–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Bhatt S, MacLennan G, Dogra V (2007) Renal Pseudotumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1380–1387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Regine G, Atzori M, Danza FM (2010) Malformazioni del rene e delle vie urinary. In: Blandino A, Danza FM, Menchi I et al (eds) Imaging dell’apparato urogenitale. Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano, pp 13–24Google Scholar
- 40.Mazziotti S, Zimbaro F, Pandolfo A et al (2010) Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of renal pseudotumors. Abdom Imaging 35:241–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012