Dermatite da contatto con prodotti per la detersione
Chapter
Riassunto
Il termine «detergente» identifica un prodotto la cui composizione sia stata appositamente studiata per ottenere la detersione cutanea, azione conseguita tramite l’abbassamento della tensione superficiale della cute. I detergenti utilizzati in età pediatrica si presentano sotto forma di latti e creme detergenti, bagnoschiuma, shampoo, oli e polveri da bagno.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Letture consigliate
- Angelini G, Foti C, Rigano L, Vena GA (1995) 3-Dimethylaminopropylamine: a key substance in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine? Contact Dermatitis 32:96–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Angelini G, Grandolfo M, Cusano F et al (1998) Linee guida sulla diagnostica della dermatite da contatto. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 134:521–538Google Scholar
- Angelini G, Rigano L, Foti C et al (1996) Contact allergy to impurites in surfactants: amount, chemical structure and carrier effects in reaction to 3-dimethylaminopropylamine. Contact Dermatitis 34:248–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Angelini G, Rigano L, Foti C et al (1996) Pure cocamidopropylbetaine is not the allergen in patients with positive reactions to commercial cocamidopropylbetaine. Contact Dermatitis 35:252–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Basketter DA, Briatico-Vangosa G, Kaestner W et al (1993) Nickel, cobalt and chromium in consumer products: a role in allergic contact dermatitis? Contact Dermatitis 28:15–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burry JN (1986) Environmental dermatitis. Contact dermatitis from perfumes in soap. Med J Aust 145:160–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caputo R, Monti M (1990) Children’s skin and cleansing agents. Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl 108:24–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Groot (1998) Fatal attractiveness: the study side cosmetics. Clin Dermatol 16:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Groot A (1994) Patch testing: test concentration and vehicles for 3700 Chemicals. Elsevier Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Dooms-Goossens A, Deveylder H, de Alam AG et al (1989) Contact sensitivity to nonoxynols as a cause of intolerance to antiseptic preparations. J Am Acad Dermatol 21:723–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Foti C, Bonamonte D, Mascolo G et al (2003) The role of 3-dimethylaminopropylamine and amidoamine in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine. Contact Dermatitis 48:194–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frosch PJ, Lahiti A, Hannuksela M et al (1995) Chloro methylisothiazolone/methylisothiazolone (CMI/MI) use test with a shampoo on patch-test positive subjects. Results of a multicentre double-blind crossover trial. Contact Dermatitis 32:210–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gelmetti C (2001) Skin cleansing in children. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1:12–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kokelj F, Daris F, Lutmann A et al (1994) Nickel, chromate and cobalt in toilet soaps analysed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Contact Dermatitis 31:270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nicander I, Aberg P, Ollmar S (2003) The use of different concentration of betaine as a reducing irritation agent in soaps monitored visually and non-invasively. Skin Res Technol 9:43–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sato Y, Kutsuna H, Kobayashi T, et al (1984) D&G nos. 10 and 11: chemical composition analysis and delayed contact hypersensitivity testing in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 10:30–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tosti A, Vincenzi C, Smith K A (2000) Provocative use testing of methyldibromoglutaronitrile in a cosmetic shampoo. Contact Dermatitis 42:64–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012