Advertisement

Removal of Totally Implantable Venous Access Device

  • Gennaro D. LaBellaEmail author
  • Julius Tang

Abstract

Infection, thrombosis, catheter malposition, rupture and embolization associated less frequently with skin erosion make up the main reasons for TIVAD removal. This chapter describes the cause, treatment and prevention of these complications. The surgical technique for removing TIVADs is thoroughly described. Lastly, attention is placed upon air embolism, a potentially devastating complication associated with TIVAD removal.

Keywords

TIVAD removal Infection Thrombosis Catheter malposition Air embolism Fowler position 

References

  1. 1.
    Sticca RP, Dewing BD, Harris, JD (2009). Outcomes of surgical and radiologic placed implantable central venous access ports. Am J Surg 198:829–833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biffi R, de Braud F, Orsi F et al (1998) Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy: a prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days. Ann Oncol 9:767–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kock HJ, Pietsch M, Krause U et al (1998) Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg 22:12–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schwarz R, Groeger J, Coit D (1997) Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis. Cancer 79:1635–1640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vardy J, Engelhardt K, Cox K et al (2004) Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 91:1045–1049PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ignatov A, Hoffman O, Smith B et al (2008) An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: Complications and patient satisfaction. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:241–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Groeger JS, Lucas AB, Thaler HAT et al (1993) Infectious morbidity associated with longterm use of venous access devices in patients with cancer. Ann Intern Med 119:1168–1174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muscedere G, Bennett JD, Lee TY et al (1998) Complications of radiologically placed central venous ports and Hickman catheters in patients with AIDS. Can Assoc Radiol J 49:84–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lorch H, Zwaan M, Kagel C, Weiss H (2001) Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:180–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Puel V, Caudry M, Le Metayer P et al (1993) Superior vena cava thrombosis related to catheter malposition in cancer chemotherapy given through implanted ports. Cancer 72:2248–2252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Gregorio MA, Miguelena JM, Fernandez JA et al (1996) Subcutaneous ports in the radiology suite: an effective and safe procedure for care in cancer patients. Eur Radiol 6:748–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ordway CB (1974) Air embolus via CVP catheter without positive pressure: presentation of case and review. Ann Surg 179:479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Armon C, Deschamps C, Adkinson C et al (1991) Hyperbaric treatment of cerebral air embolism sustained during an open-heart surgical procedure. Mayo Clin Proc 66:565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Groell R, Schaffler GJ, Rienmueller R, Kern R (1997) Vascular air embolism: location, frequency, and cause on electron-beam CT studies of the chest. Radiology 202:459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Valentino R, Hilbert G, Vargas F, Gruson D (2003) Computed tomographic scan of massive cerebral air embolism. Lancet 361:1848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical EducationHatton Research Center, Good Samaritan HospitalCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations