Lo studio elettrofisiologico endocavitario

  • Caterina Bisceglia
  • Valentina Boccadamo

Abstract

Lo studio elettrofisiologico è una procedura diagnostica invasiva utilizzata per la valutazione delle proprietà di eccito-conduzione del cuore e per lo studio delle aritmie cardiache che precede il trattamento con radiofrequenza delle stesse. Lo SEE ha una sensibilità e una specificità variabile nel determinare le anomalie nel ritmo cardiaco. Negli atleti i parametri di base dello SEF possono mostrare sensibili differenze rispetto alla popolazione generale. Attraverso l’utilizzo di nuovi sistemi per “mappare” elettricamente il cuore, si possono determinare proprietà elettriche patologiche delle camere cardiache e supportare la diagnosi precoce di condizioni patologiche a elevato rischio di morte improvvisa, nonché effettuare ablazioni di aritmie estremamente complesse.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Letture consigliate

  1. Avella A, d’Amati G et al (2008) Diagnostic value of endomyocardial biopsy guided by electroanatomic voltage mapping in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 19:1127–1134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biffi A, Ansalone G, Verdile L et al (1996) Ventricular arrhythmias and athlete’s heart. Role of signal-averaged electrocardiography, Eur Heart J 17:557–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biffi A, Pelliccia A, Verdile L et al (2002) Long-term clinical significance of frequent and complex ventricular tachyarrhythmias in trained athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:446–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonso A, Corò L, Delise P et al (1996) Bradicardia sinusale e turbe della conduzione. Atti del Convegno Nazionale di Cardiologia della SportGoogle Scholar
  5. Delise P (2004) Aritmie: diagnosi, prognosi e terapia. Casa Editrice Scientifica Internazionale, RomaGoogle Scholar
  6. Delise P, Bonso A, Corò L et al (1991) The endocavitary and transesophageal electrophysiological findings in idiopathic atrial fibrillation. G Ital Cardiol 21:1093–1099PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Estes III NA, Link MS, Cannom D et al (2001) Report of the NASPE policy conference on arrhythmias and the athlete. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 12:1208–1219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Furlanello F, Galanti G, Manetti P et al (2004) Microvolt T wave alternans as a predictor of electrophysiological testing results in professional competitive athletes. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 9:201–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Giada F, Barold SS, Biffi A, De Piccoli B et al (2007) Sport and arrhythmias: summary of an international symposium. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 14:707–714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giustetto C, Gaita F (2008) Sudden cardiac death in athletes with an apparently normal heart: the channelopathies. G Ital Cardiol 9:78S–82SGoogle Scholar
  11. Heidbüchel H, Corrado D, Biffi A et al (2006) Study Group on Sports Cardiology of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Recommendations for participation in leisure-time physical activity and competitive sports of patients with arrhyttmias and potentially arrhythmogenic conditions. Part II: ventricular arrhrythimas, channelopathies and iplantable defibrillators. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 13:676–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heidbüchel H, Hoogsteen J, Fagard R et al (2003) High prevalence of right ventricular involvement in endurance athletes with ventricular arrhythimias. Role of an electrophiologic study in risk stratification. Eur Heart J 24:1473–1480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Inama G, Pedrinazzi C, Durin O et al (2008). Microvolt T wavealternans for risk stratification in athletes with ventricular arrhythmias:correlation with programmed ventricular stimulation Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 13:14–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Josephson ME (2002) Clinical cardiac electrophysiology, techiques and interpretations. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Langdeau JB, Blier L, Turcotte H et al (2001) Electrocardiographic findings in athletes: the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy and conduction defects. Can J Cardiol. 17:655–659PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Link MS, Wang PJ, Estes III NA (2001) Ventricular arrhythmias in the athlete. Curr Opin Cardiol 16:30–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Madias JE (2008) Athletes, ventricular arrhythmias, electrophysiologica testing, microvolt T-wave alternans, and a follow-up of 30+/−21 months: a need for follow-up updates. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 13:319–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paterick TE, Petrick TJ, Fletcher GF et al (2005) Medical and legal issues in the cardiovascular evaluation of competitive athletes. JAMA 294:3011–3018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sarubbi B (2006) The Wolff-Parkinson-White electrocardiogram pattern in athletes: how and when to evaluate the risk for dangerous arrhythmias. The opinion of the pediatric cardiologist. J Cardiovasc Med 7:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stein R, Moraes RS, Cavalcanti AV et al (2000) Atrial automaticity and atrioventricular conduction in athletes: contribution of autonomic regulation. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thiene G, Carturan E, Corrado D, Basso C (2010) Prevention of sudden cardiac death in the young and in athletes: dream or reality? Cardiovasc Pathol 19:210–217Google Scholar
  22. Zeppilli P (2004) Cardiologia dello sport. Casa Editrice Scientifica Internazionale, RomaGoogle Scholar
  23. Zeppilli P, Fenici R, Sassara M et al (1980) Wenckebach second-degree A-V block in top ranking athletes: an old problem revisited. Am Heart J 100:281–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caterina Bisceglia
    • 1
  • Valentina Boccadamo
  1. 1.Dipartimento di ElettrofisiologiaPoliclinico Universitario “San Raffaele”MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations