Studio dell’ischemia miocardica

  • Luigi Natale
  • Antonio Bernardini
  • Lorenzo Bonomo
Chapter

Riassunto

Il circolo coronarico ha la necessità di adattarsi molto rapidamente alle variazioni di richiesta di ossigeno da parte del muscolo cardiaco. Tale adattamento obbedisce ad un complesso meccanismo di regolazione, la cui comprensione è cruciale per capire sia la fisiopatologia dell’evento ischemico, sia il contributo che l’imaging può dare nella malattia coronarica.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. 1.
    Klocke FJ, Mates RE, Coley DP et al (1976) Physiology of coronary circulation in health and coronary disease. In: Yu P, Goodwin J (eds) Progress in Cardiology. Lea & Febiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schaper W (1993) Coronary collateral development: concepts and hypothese. In: Schaper W, Schaper J (eds) Collateral circulation. Kluvers Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 41–64Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gould KL, Kirkeeide RL, Buchi M (1990) Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:459–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Camici P, Ferranni E, Opie LH (1989) Myocardial metabolism in ischemic heart disease: basic principles and application to imaging by positron emission tomography. Progr CV Disease 32:217–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gebker R, Fleck E (2004) Pathophysiology of myocardial perfusion. In: Nagel E, van Rossum AC, Fleck E (eds) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Springer-Verlag, pp 181–185Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gallagher KP, Kumada T, Koziol JA et al (1980) Significance of regional wal thickening abnormalities relative to transmural myocardial perfusion in anesthetized dogs. Circulation 62:1266–1274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilson RF, Marcus ML, White CW (1987) Prediction of the physiologic significance of coronary artery lesions by quantitative lesion geometry in patients with limited coronary artery disease. Circulation 75:723–732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gould KL, Lipscomb K (1974) Effect of coronary stenosis on coronary flow reserve and resistance. Am J Cardiol 34:48–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nesto RW, Kowalchiuk GJ (1987) The ischemic cascade: temporal sequence of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic and symptomatic expressions of ischemia. Am J Cardiol 59:23C–30CCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nagel E (2004) Dobutamine stress-MRI, In: Nagel E, van Rossum AC, Fleck E (eds) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Springer-Verlag, pp 181–185Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilson RF, Wyche K, Christensen BV et al (1990) Effects of adenosine on human coronary artery circulation. Circulation 82:1595–1606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Roos A, Matheijssen NA, Doornbos J et al (1990) Myocardial infarct size after reperfusion therapy: assessment with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 176:517–521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burstein D, Taratuta E, Manning WJ (1991) Factors in myocardial perfusion imaging with ultrafast MRI and Gd-DTPA administration. Magn Reson Med 20:299–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keijer JT, van Rossum AC, Wilke N et al (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial perfusion in single vessel coronary arter disease: implications for transmural assessment of myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2:189–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Al Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M et al (2000) Non-invasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 101:1379–1383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S et al (2001) Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 103:2230–2235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilke N, Jerosh-Herold M, Wang Y et al (1997) Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 204: 373–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zaacks SM, Ali A, Parrillo JE et al (1999) How well does radionuclide dypiridamole stress testing detect three-vessel disease and ischemia in region supplied by the most stenotic vessel? Clin Nucl Med 24:35–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilke N, Zenovich A, Muehling O et al (2000) MR perfusion imaging performs better in individual vessels than SPECT. Circulation 102:686–694Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang JZ et al (2002) Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 346:1948–1953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schaefer S, van Tyen R, Saloner D (1992) Evaluation of myocardial perfusion abnormalities with gadolinium-enhanced snapshot MR imaging in humans. Work in progress. Radiology 185:795–801PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hartnell G, Cerel A, Kamalesh M et al (1994) Detection of myocardial ischemia: value of combined myocardial perfusion and cineangiographic MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:1061–1067.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ et al (2001) Echo-planar magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: parametric map analysis and comparison with thallium SPECT. J Magn Reson Imag 13:192–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M et al (2003) Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 229:209–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee DC, Simonetti OP, Harris KR et al (2004) Magnetic resonance versus radionuclide pharmacological stress perfusion imaging for flow-limiting stenoses of varying severity. Circulation 110:58–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC et al (2008) MRIMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 29:480–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG, Schreiber K et al (2002) Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrat-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:864–870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luigi Natale
    • 1
  • Antonio Bernardini
    • 2
  • Lorenzo Bonomo
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Radiologia — Dipartimento di Bioimmagini e Scienze RadiologicheUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRoma
  2. 2.Servizio di RadiologiaOspedale G. MazziniTeramo

Personalised recommendations