On Stock-Price Fluctuations in the Periods of Booms and Stagnations
Abstract
The statistical properties of the fluctuations of financial prices have been widely researched since Mandelbrot [1] and Fama [2] presented an evidence that return distributions can be well described by a symmetric Levy stable law with tail index close to 1.7. Many empirical studies have shown that the tails of the distributions of returns and volatility follow approximately a power law with estimates of the tail index falling in the range 2 to 4 for large value of returns and volatility. (See, for examples, de Vries [3]; Pagan [4]; Longin [5], Lux [6]; Guillaume et al. [7]; Muller et al. [8]; Gopikrishnan et al. [9], Gopikrishnan et al. [10], Plerou et al. [11], Liu et al. [12]). However, there is also evidence against power-law tails. For instance, Barndorff-Nielsen [13], and Eberlein et al. [14] have respectively fitted the distributions of returns using normal inverse Gaussian, and hyperbolic distribution. Laherrere and Sornette [15] have suggested to describe the distributions of returns by the stretched-exponential distribution. Dragulescu and Yakovenko [16] have shown that the distributions of returns have been approximated by exponential distributions. More recently, Malevergne, Pisarenko and Sornette [17] have suggested that the tails ultimately decay slower than any stretched exponential distribution but probably faster than power laws with reasonable exponents as a result from various statistical tests of returns.
Keywords
Stock Market Exponential Distribution Return Distribution Tail Index Noise TraderPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Mandelbrot B (1963) Journal of Business 36:392–417Google Scholar
- 2.Fama EF (1965) Journal of Business 38:34–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.de Vries CG (1994) in The Handbook of International Macroeconomics, F. van der Ploeg (ed.) pp.348–389 BlackwellGoogle Scholar
- 4.Pagan A (1996) Journal of Empirical Finance 3:15–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Longin FM (1996) Journal of Business 96:383–408Google Scholar
- 6.Lux T (1996) Applied Financial Economics 6:463–475CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 7.Guillaume DM, Dacorogna MM, Dave RR, Muller UA, Olsen RB, Pictet OV (1997) Finance and Stochastics 1:95–130MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Muller UA, Dacarogna MM, Picktet OV (1998) in R.J. Adler, R.E. Feldman, M.S. Taqqu, Birkhauser, Boston (eds.), A Practical Guide to Heavy Tails, pp.55–78Google Scholar
- 9.Gopikrishnan P, Meyer M, Amaral LAN, Stanley HE (1998) European Physical Journal B 3:139–140CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 10.Gopikrishnan P, Plerou V, Amaral LAN, Meyer M, Stanley HE (1999) Phys. Rev. E 60:5305–5316CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 11.Plerou V, Gopikrishnan P, Amaral LAN, Meyer M, Stanley HE (2000) Phys. Rev. E 60:6519–6529CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 12.Liu Y, Gopikrishnan P, Cizeau P, Meyer M, Peng C-K, Stanley HE (1990) Physical Review E 60(2):1390–1400CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 13.Barndorff-Nielsen OE (1997) Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 24:1–13MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 14.Eberlein E, Keller U, Prause K (1998) Journal of Business 71:371–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Laherrere J, Sornette D (1999) European Physical Journal B 2:525–539ADSGoogle Scholar
- 16.Dragulescu AA, Yakovenko VM (2002) Quantitative Finance 2(6):443–453CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 17.Malevergne Y, Pisarenko VF, Sornette D (2005) Quantitative Finance 5(4):379–401MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kaizoji T (2004), Physica A343:662–668.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kaizoji T (2005) in T. Lux, S. Reitz, and E. Samanidou (eds.): Nonlinear Dynamics and Heterogeneous Intercting Agents: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 550, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp.237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Yang J-S, Chae S, Jung W-S, Moon H-T (2006) Physica A 363:377–382CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar