Surgical Techniques for Inguinal Hernia Repair: Open Techniques—Tissue Repairs

  • Rey Melchor F. Santos


The pathophysiology of inguinal hernia is based primarily on a defect in the myopectineal orifice of Fruchaud (Fig. 8.1), which may be repaired by approximation of tissues together to close the defect (tissue repair) or bridging the defect with a mesh to create a tension-free repair (mesh repair). The rapid development in technology has revolutionized the treatment of hernia repair with the development of the mesh and endoscopic instrumentations which made the posterior approach to the inguinal area accessible, and highly effective in treating the hernia defect. Despite these advances, tissue repair still remains to be an acceptable procedure for some inguinal hernias, particularly in cases where the local condition in the inguinal area is contaminated or potentially contaminated, which contraindicates the use of a foreign material, like the mesh. Besides, some tissue repairs, like the Shouldice repair, have been shown by studies to have a recurrence rate of 1% [1] and that could be comparable to the tension-free or mesh repair, whether done with the anterior or posterior approach. Based on the guidelines of the European Hernia Society, Shouldice repair is the best non-mesh repair for inguinal hernias [2]. A 2012 meta-analysis from the Cochrane Database demonstrated significantly lower rates of hernia recurrence (OR 0.62, CI 0.45–0.85) in patients undergoing Shouldice operations when compared with other open tissue-based methods [3]. In a study of McGuillicuddy et al., Shouldice repair can compare with Lichtenstein technique in terms of effectivity. However, in the long-term basis Lichtenstein technique has a shorter learning curve, easier to learn, and could be done also under local anesthesia, with lesser recurrences [4].



I would like to thank and acknowledge my artist illustrator Dr. Frank Joseph Viray for providing the illustrations in my discussion of the various open techniques of tissue repairs for inguinal hernias.


  1. 1.
    Glassgow F. The Shouldice Hospital technique. Int Surg. 1986;71:148–53.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13:343–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amato B, Panico S, et al. Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;4:CD001543.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McGillicuddy JE. Prospective randomized comparison of the Shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures. Arch Surg. 1998;133(9):974–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Obney N, Chan CK. Repair of multiple time recurrent inguinal hernias with reference to common causes of recurrences. Contemp Surg. 1984;25:25–32.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bendavid R. Symposium on the management of inguinal hernias: The Shouldice technique: a canon in hernia repair. Can J Surg. 1997;40(3):199–205.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fitzgibbons R, Richards A. Open hernia repair. ACS surgery principles and practice; 2003. p. 668.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beets G, Oosterhuis KJ, et al. Long term follow up (12-15 years) of a randomized controlled trial comparing Bassini-Stetten, Shouldice and high ligation with narrowing of the internal ring for primary inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(4):352–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hay JM, Boudet MJ, Fingerhut A, Poucher J, Hennet H, Habib E, et al. Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicenter controlled trial in 1578 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;222(6):719–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wagner J, Brunicardi FC, Parviz A, Chen D. Inguinal hernia, Swartz’s principles of surgery. 10th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education; 2015. p. 1514.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    SMIL Study Group, Berndsen F, Petersson U, Arvidsson D, Leijonmarck C-E, et al. Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice Inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group. Hernia. 2007;11(4):307–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bitner R, Sauerland S, Schedt C-G. Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(5):605–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature India Private Limited 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rey Melchor F. Santos
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryVeterans Memorial Medical CenterQuezon CityPhilippines
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryFEU-NRMF Medical CenterQuezon CityPhilippines

Personalised recommendations