Advertisement

Laparoscopic Pre-peritoneal Onlay Mesh (PPOM) Repair for Ventral and Incisional Hernia

  • George Pei Cheung YangEmail author
Chapter
  • 201 Downloads

Abstract

Leblanc described the laparoscopic mesh repair of incisional hernia in 1993 [1]. It involves placing a PTFE the mesh with fixation by staples in the posterior abdominal wall in the peritoneal cavity covering the hernia orifice. This technique is known as intra-peritoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM). The IPOM+ [2] technique involves the addition of closing the hernia defect with suture before placement of the mesh in the intra-peritoneal cavity. Laparoscopic repair for ventral hernia has undisputed advantages. Being able to place a large mesh through just several small tiny 5–10 mm wounds minimized tissue dissection and hence lowers the risk of wound infection. With low rate of wound infection, the risk of mesh infection also reduced. Secondly it clearly identifies the site and size of all hernia defects and avoids missing out multiple defects in some patients. However, having the mesh placed in the peritoneal cavity creates one problem—mesh-induced visceral complications. This is a result of foreign body reaction to the synthetic materials and the tackers, or chemical degradation reaction to those re-absorbable components of the mesh like the coating barriers or absorbable tackers. This chronic foreign body tissue reaction, if persist long enough, will leads to bowel erosion and fistulation, and in some cases migration of the mesh into the internal lumen of the bowel causing distal obstruction. Some even reported spontaneous passage of the mesh through rectum [3]. This is more than just usual post-operative adhesion. The severity of this reaction is difficult to predict. Some may exhibit extensive reaction leading to adhesion, fistulation and obstruction. On the other hand, others might have mild reaction only. It is impossible to predict who will have problem and who will not. Needless to say there is no clinical parameter allowing us to predict the future progress of the patient after IPOM repair. The true incident of mesh-induced visceral complications is not known. The complexity of such event and subsequent management can be a surgical nightmare. It is this mesh-induced visceral complication drives the search for alternative laparoscopic approach for ventral and incisional hernia repair.

References

  1. 1.
    LeBlanc KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3(1):39–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chelala E, Gaede F, Douillez V, Dessily M, Alle JL. The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernias: preliminary results. Hernia. 2003;7(4):191–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horzic M, Vergles D, Cupurdija K, Kopljar M, Zidak M, Lackovie Z. Spontaneous mesh evacuation per rectum after incisional ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2011;15:351–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schwarz J, Reinpold W, Bittner R. Endoscopic mini/less open sublay technique (EMILOS)—a new technique for ventral hernia repair. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2017;402:173–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Novitsky YW, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB, Rosen MJ. Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2012;204:709–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miserez M, Penninckx F. Endoscopic totally preperitoneal ventral hernia repair. Surgical technique and short-term results. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1207–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Belyanshky I, Zahiri HR, Park A. Laparoscopic transversus abdominis release, a novel minimally invasive approach to complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Innov. 2015;23(2):134–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang GPC, Tung KLM. Preperitoneal onlay mesh repair for ventral abdominal wall and incisional hernia: a novel technique. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016;9(4):344–7. ISSN 1758-5902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Current treatment concept for groin hernia. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2014;399:553–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prasad P, Tantia O, Patle NM, Khanna S, Sen B. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a comparative study of transabdominal preperitoneal versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(6):477–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Polychronidis A, Tsaroucha AK, Karayiannakis AJ, Perente S, Efstathiou E, Simopoulos C. Delayed perforation of the large bowel due to thermal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Int Med Res. 2005;33(3):360–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Colak E, Ozlem N, Kucuk GO, Aktimur R, Kesmer S, Yildirim K. Propsective randomized trial of mesh fixation with absorbable versus nonabsorbable tacker in laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(11):21611–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature India Private Limited 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hong Kong Adventist HospitalHappy ValleyHong Kong

Personalised recommendations