Crafts, Innovation and Exclusion: Challenges for Inclusion in a Terracotta Cluster, Rajasthan

  • Keshab DasEmail author
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)


The massive presence of craft clusters in rural India has not only been a source of local resource use and non-farm income generation but also of opportunities for innovation promising product diversification, reaching out to newer markets and networking between relevant business-state-research stakeholders. However, craft clusters, despite eulogising the craftsmanship and/or a culture of it, have suffered severe neglect in terms of inadequate policy attention that largely deprived the enterprises from participating as active entities within the regional or national systems of innovation. In addition to well-known supply-side constraints at the cluster level, the absence of or weak collective action by cluster constituents has been recognised as a major limitation of rural clusters to move up. The idea of inclusive innovation is a manner of recognising the exclusion of plaguing rural enterprises. Drawing upon primary survey-based findings in a terracotta cluster in rural Rajasthan, this paper interrogates issues in limits to innovation within an informal and poor economy context. It is observed that the specific context of production, labour process and business as a whole underscores a distinct approach in institutional innovation that would facilitate sustainable access to basic raw materials, skills and market channels. This is essential for ensuring inclusive innovation beyond the limited artefact-centric product or process innovation.


  1. Ameta, H. R. (2003). Census: Handicraft Artisans 1995–96. Seminar (Vol. 523, pp. 73–75).Google Scholar
  2. Berdegué, J. A. (2005). Pro-poor innovation systems, international fund for agricultural development. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from
  3. Das, K. (2005). Industrial clustering in India: Local dynamics and the global debate. In K. Das (Ed.), Indian industrial clusters (pp. 1–19). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Das, K. (2007). Electricity and rural development linkage. In H. Panda (Ed.), Governance of rural electricity system in India (pp. 53–66). New Delhi: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Das, K. (2008). Fostering competitive clusters in Asia: Towards an inclusive policy perspective. VRF Monograph No. 437. Institute of Developing Economies, Chiba, Japan.Google Scholar
  6. Das, K. (2011a). Indian rural clusters and innovation: Challenges for inclusion. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 6(1), 283–301.Google Scholar
  7. Das, K. (2011b). Rural industrialization in India: Enhancing reach and returns. In K. Das (Ed.), Micro and small enterprises in India: The era of reforms (pp. 208–224). New Delhi: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Das, K. (2015). Institutional constraints to innovation: Artisan clusters in rural India. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 4(2), 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Das, K. (2017). Craft clusters and work in rural India: An exploration. In D. Narasimha Reddy & K. Sarap (Eds.), Rural labour mobility in times of structural transformation: Dynamics and perspectives from Asian economies (pp. 103–125). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Gupta, A. K. (2010). Leveraging innovations for inclusive governance. Working paper 2010-10-01. Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.Google Scholar
  11. Lundvall, B.-A. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Siverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349–369). London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Mudombi, S., & Muchie, M. (2014). An institutional perspective to challenges undermining innovation activities in Africa. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mytelka, L. K. (2007). From clusters to innovation systems in traditional industries. In B. Oyelaran-Oyeyinka & D. McCormick (Eds.), Industrial clusters and innovation systems in Africa: Institutions, markets and policy (pp. 39–62). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Nur, Y. (2012). Rethinking the innovation approach in developing countries. World Technopolis Review, 1(2), 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schumpeter, J. A. (2012) [1934]. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  16. Utz, A., & Dahlman, C. (2007). Promoting inclusive innovation in India. In M. A. Dutz (Ed.), Unleashing India’s innovation: Toward sustainable and inclusive growth (pp. 105–128). Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Wieczorek, A., Hekkert, M., & Smits, R. (2009).Contemporary Innovation Policy and Instruments: Challenges and Implications, Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) (Working Paper Series No. 09–12). Utrecht: Utrecht University. Retrieved April 21, 2018, from
  18. Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The Social Shaping of Technology. Research Policy, 25(6), 865–899.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature India Private Limited 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gujarat Institute of Development ResearchAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations