Advertisement

Inclusive Innovation: Changing Actors and Agenda

  • Rajeswari S. RainaEmail author
  • Keshab Das
Chapter
  • 41 Downloads
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

This introductory chapter presents the spaces, forms and norms of exclusion mainly in and of rural India. It lays the foundation for explaining the evidence on how some of these exclusions have been overcome or changed to enable inclusive innovation, and how many forms and norms of exclusion persist. Theoretically, the state with its organized policies and programmes, and the formal organized knowledge actors are the fulcrum in both development economics and innovation systems studies. When exclusion in its multiple and mutually reinforcing forms becomes invisible or part of accepted norms of development, the nature of these actors and their agenda demand specific attention. Drawing upon the findings of a research project, which was that inclusive innovation demanded reform or major changes in the innovation system components, this chapter explores the conventional dichotomy between public and private policies and decision making, the capacity of the state and the market to direct and operationalize innovation and the role of organized science and technology (S&T) in the spatial diversity and informality of rural India. The agenda setting framing of development driven by industrialization and the supply of technologies for industrialization from formal S&T derive from ex-post analysis and theorization in development economics. This makes it impossible for the key actors—the state and formal S&T organizations— to engage with the massive informality, diversity of livelihoods and knowledge and the multiple exclusions in and of rural India. The ex-post theorization of development and approaches to organize science and technology for innovation for industrialization pay little attention to the history of economic development in the West. The state was one among several actors in the West, a big enabler of multiple sources of incremental and revolutionary technological changes and several institutional innovations. This introduction also points out that contrary to received wisdom from development studies and innovation systems framework, organized scientific research and the institutionalization of public and private corporate science did not lead to but were the consequences of the first and much of the second industrial revolutions. The chapter details the organization of the book and the key evidence presented in each chapter, concluding with a demand for democratic decentralized innovation capacities fostered by communities, formal S&T and the state.

References

  1. ADB. (2005). Key indicators of developing Asian and Pacific countries 2005. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Amsden, A. (1992). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialisation. UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (2002). Policy dynamics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1986). Democracy and capitalism: Property, community and the contradictions of modern social thought. Basic Books, republished 2011 by Routledge Revivals, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Chang, H. J. (2009). Rethinking public policy in agriculture: Lessons from history, distant and recent. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 477–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chataway, J., Hanlin, R., & Kaplinsky, R. (2013). Inclusive innovation: An architecture for policy development. IKD working paper no. 65. London: The Open University.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2007). Absolute poverty measures for the developing world, 1981–2004, World Bank, Development Research Group. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  8. Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1998). The associational economy: Firms, regions and innovations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cozzens, S., & Kaplinsky, R. (2009). Innovation, poverty and inequality: Cause, coincidence or co-evolution? In Lundvall et al. (Eds.), Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries (pp. 57–82).Google Scholar
  10. Das, D. K., Sen, K., & Das, P. C. (2015). Labour Intensity in Indian Manufacturing. In K. V. Ramaswamy (Ed.), Labour, Employment and Economic Growth in India (pp. 153-180). New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Das, K. (2015). Institutional constraints to innovation: Artisan clusters in rural India. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 4(2), 132–153.Google Scholar
  12. Das, K. (2011). Rural industrialization in India: Enhancing reach and returns. In K. Das (Ed.), Micro and small enterprises in India: The era of reforms (pp. 208–224). New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Das, K. (2005). Industrial Clustering in India: Local dynamics and the Global Debate. In K. Das (Ed.), Indian Industrial Clusters (pp. 1–19). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Dev, S. M., & Ravi, C. (2007). Poverty and inequality: All India and state 1983–2005. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(6), 509–521.Google Scholar
  15. Dickson, D. (2012, April). IDRC cuts regional offices and ends innovation programme. SciDev.Net. https://www.scidev.net/global/communication/news/idrc-cuts-regional-offices-and-ends-innovation-programme.html.
  16. Escobar, A. (2010). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation and economic development. TIK working papers on innovation studies, no. 20090723. University of Oslo. http://ideas.repec.org/s/tik/inowpp.html.
  18. Ferguson, N. (2018). Many happy returns to the financial crash of 2008. Published online 9/6/2018. http://www.niallferguson.com/journalism/finance-economics/many-unhappy-returns-to-the-financial-crash-of-2008.
  19. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, C. (1995). National system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5–24.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, C. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  22. Gates, B. (2018, February 8). Another recession is a certainty. Fortune.Google Scholar
  23. Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge: Bellknap Press.Google Scholar
  24. Goldstone, J. (2010). Review of the enlightened economy by Joel Mokyr. Journal of Economic History, 993–995.Google Scholar
  25. Government of India. (2014). India inclusive innovation fund. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
  26. Grabowski, R. (2002). The relationship of state and society: Productive or unproductive. Journal of Developing Societies, 18(1), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Himanshu. (2018). Widening gaps: India inequality report. Delhi: Oxfam India.Google Scholar
  28. IDRC. (2009). Innovation systems for inclusive development: Lessons from rural China and India (Project ID 105357). Ottawa: IDRC.Google Scholar
  29. IDRC. (2011). Innovation for inclusive development (IID). Ottawa: IDRC.Google Scholar
  30. Immelt, J., Govindarajan, V., & Trimble C. (2009, October). How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard Business Review, 1–12.Google Scholar
  31. Jasanoff, S. (2017, January 16–17). Knowledge, democracy and development. Paper presented at the Symposium on SDGs, Knowledge and Democracy: Re-imagining Purposes and Opportunities, at Shiv Nadar University, Gautam Buddh Nagar.Google Scholar
  32. Jha, S. K., & Krishnan, R. T. (2013). Local innovation: The key to globalization. IIM B Management Review, 25, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaplinksy, R., & Morris, M. (2009). The Asian drivers and SSA: Is there a future for export oriented African industrialization? World Economy, 32(11), 1638–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kay, C. (2002). Why East Asia overtook Latin America: Agrarian reform, industrialisation and development. Third World Quarterly, 23(6), 1073–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agenda, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  36. Lanjouw, P., & Murgai, R. (2009). Poverty decline, agricultural wages, and non-far, employment in India: 1983–2004. World Bank policy research working paper 4858. Ashington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  37. Leadbeater, C., & Wilsdon, J. (2007). The atlas of ideas: How Asian innovation can benefit us all. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  38. Lewis, A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22.Google Scholar
  39. Lundvall, B. S. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  40. Lundvall, B. A. (2010). Scope, style and theme of research on knowledge and learning societies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(1), 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lundvall, B. A., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (2009). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: Building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marglin, S. A. (2008). The dismal science—How thinking like an economist undermines community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Milanovic, B. (2012). Global income inequality by the numbers: In history and now. An overview. Policy research working papers Nov. 6259. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  44. Milanovic, B. (2009). Global Inequality Recalcuated—The effect of new 2005 PPP estimates on Global Inequality. WPS 5061. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  45. Mokyr, J. (1990). The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mokyr, J. (2016). A culture of growth: The origins of the modern economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Nagaraj, R. (2011). Industrial performance 1991–2008, a review. In R. Nagaraj (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Nair, T. (2015). Regulation, legislation and moral contestations—The case of Indian microfinance. In R. S. Raina (Ed.), Science, technology and development in India: Encountering values (pp. 66–83). Hyderabad: Orient BlackSwan.Google Scholar
  49. Nellemann, C., MacDevette, M., Manders, T., Eickhout, B., Svihus, B., Prins, A. G., et al. (Eds.). (2009). The Environmental Food Crisis – the Environment’s Role in Averting Future Food Crises. United Nations Environment Programme: Arendal.Google Scholar
  50. Nelson, R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
  51. Nelson, R. (2008). What enables rapid economic progress: What are the needed institutions? Research Policy, 37, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. NIC. (2011). India Inclusive Innovation Fund, National Innovation Council, Office of Advisor to the Prime Minister, New Delhi: Yojana Bhavan, Government of India. http://innovationcouncilarchive.nic.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=34
  53. Niti Aayog. (2015). Atal Innovation Mission. http://niti.gov.in/content/atal-innovation-mission-aim.
  54. OECD. (2007). Innovation and growth: Rationale for an innovation strategy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  55. OECD. (2013). Innovation and inclusive development. Conference Discussion Report (Cape Town, South Africa, 2012). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  56. Office of Advisor to the Prime Minister. (2011). Towards a more inclusive and innovative India: Creating a roadmap for a decade of innovation. Strategy Paper. Office of Advisor to the Prime Minister: New Delhi: Yojana Bhavan, Government of India.Google Scholar
  57. Papola, T. S., & Sahu, P. P. (2012). Growth and structure of employment in India: Long-term and post-reform performance and emerging challenges. New Delhi: ISID.Google Scholar
  58. Planning Commission. (2012). Twelfth five year plan 2012–17 (Vol. II). Planning Commission, Government of India.Google Scholar
  59. Polanyi, K. (1944) (2001 edn.). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  60. Prahlad, C. K., & Hart, S. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy and Business, 26, 54–67.Google Scholar
  61. Prebisch, R. (1959). Commercial policy in the underdeveloped countries. American Economic Review, 49(2), 251–273.Google Scholar
  62. Radjou, N., & Prabhu, J. (2015). Frugal innovation: How to do better with less. Delhi: The Economist and Hachette India.Google Scholar
  63. Raina, R. S. (2006, August). Researching the drylands. Seminar (No. 546, pp. 25–29).Google Scholar
  64. Raina, R. S. (2015). Technological and institutional change: India’s development trajectory in an innovation systems framework. In P. Shome & P. Sharma (Eds.), Emerging economies: Food and energy security, and technology and innovation (pp. 329–352). New Delhi: Springer.Google Scholar
  65. Raj, K. N. (1961/2006). Some features of economic growth of the last decade in India. In A. Mody (Ed.), Inclusive growth—K. N. Raj’s essays on economic development in The Economic Weekly and Economic and Political Weekly. Hyderabad: Sameeksha Trust & Orient Longman (Reprinted 2006).Google Scholar
  66. Ray, S. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of agriculture in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Reddy, A. K. N. (1975). Alternative technology: A viewpoint from India. Social Studies of Science, 5(3), 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rosenberg, N., & Birdzell, L. E. Jr. (1986). How the West Grew Rich. London: Basic Books; Bombay: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar
  69. Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1943). Problems of industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. The Economic Journal, 53, 202–211.Google Scholar
  70. Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Rudra, A. (1978). Organisation of agriculture for rural development: The Indian case. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2(4), 381–406.Google Scholar
  72. Sachs, W. (Ed.). (1992/2010). The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  73. Sachs, W. (2017). The sustainable development goals and Laudato si’: Varieties of post-development? Third World Quarterly, Special issue: The Development Dictionary @25, 38(12), 2573–2587.Google Scholar
  74. Santiago, F. (2014). Innovation for inclusive development. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Seers, D. (1979). The birth, life and death of development economics. Development and Change, 10, 707–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sen, A. (1981). Market failure and control of labour power: Towards an explanation of ‘structure’ and change in Indian agriculture, part 1. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 5, 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sen, A., & Himanshu. (2004). Poverty and inequality in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(39).Google Scholar
  78. Shah, M., Banerjee, D., & Vijayshankar, P. S. (1998). India’s drylands: Tribal societies and development through environmental regeneration. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Shapin, S. (2006). Science. Contexts, 5(3), 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shrivastava, A., & Kothari, A. (2012). Churning the earth: The making of global India. Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
  81. SIID. (2010, February). “Inclusion” in innovation systems. SIID Communique No. 2. Project team Systems of Innovation for Inclusive Development. New Delhi: CPR.Google Scholar
  82. Singh, S. (2006). Credit, indebtedness and farmer suicides in Punjab: Some missing links. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(30), 3330–3331.Google Scholar
  83. Suryanarayana, M. H. (2008). What is exclusive about ‘inclusive growth?’. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(43), 93–101.Google Scholar
  84. Sutherland et al. (2012). A collaboratively derived science policy research agenda. Plos One, 7(3).Google Scholar
  85. Tomich, P., et al. (1995). Transforming agrarian economies: opportunities seized, opportunities missed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  86. UNCTAD. (2014). Innovation policy tools for inclusive development. A note by UNCTAD. Geneva: UNCTAD Secretariat.Google Scholar
  87. Vaidyanathan, A. (2010). Agricultural growth in India: The role of technology, incentives and institutions. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Visvanathan, S. (2009). The search for cognitive justice. Seminar (Issue on Knowledge in Question—A Symposium on interrogating knowledge and questioning science), No. 597.Google Scholar
  89. Von Tunzelmann, N., & Acha, V. (2005). Innovation in “low-tech” industries. In Fagerberg et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  91. World Bank. (2013). World Bank Group support for innovation and entrepreneurship. An independent evaluation. IEG, World Bank: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  92. Wu, X., & Raina, R. S. (2008, April). (mimeo) Innovation systems for inclusive development: Lessons from rural China and India. Research proposal submitted to IDRC, Ottawa.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature India Private Limited 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International Relations and Governance StudiesShiv Nadar UniversityGautam Buddha NagarIndia
  2. 2.Gujarat Institute of Development ResearchAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations