Modeling Indian General Elections: Sentiment Analysis of Political Twitter Data

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 339)

Abstract

Twitter is a microblogging website where users read and write short messages on various topics every day. Political analysis using social media is getting attention of many researchers to understand the public opinion and trend especially during election time. In this paper, we propose a novel approach based on semantics and context aware rules to detect the public opinion and further predict election results. We crawled the political tweets during the general election in India, and further evaluate our proposed approach against the election results. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed rules in determining the sentiment of the political tweets.

Keywords

Sentiment analysis Social media Political sentiment 

References

  1. 1.
    Blenn, N., Charalampidou, K., Doerr, C.: Context-sensitive sentiment classification of short colloquial text. In: Proceedings of IFIP’12, pp. 97–108, Prague, Czech Republic (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mittal, N., Agarwal, B., Agarwal, S., Agarwal, S., Gupta, P.: A hybrid approach for twitter sentiment analysis. In: 10th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON), pp. 116–120 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agarwal, B., Mittal, N.: Prominent feature extraction for review analysis: an empirical study. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. (2014). doi:10.1080/0952813X.2014.977830 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Subrahmanian, V.S., Reforgiato, D.: Ava: adjective-verb-adverb combinations for sentiment analysis. Intell. Syst. 23(4), 43–50 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turney, P.: Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of 40th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 417–424, Philadelphia, PA (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., Stede, M.: Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Comput. Linguis. 37(2), 267–307 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: SentiWordNet: a publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 417–422 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romanyshyn, M.: Rule-based sentiment analysis of ukrainian reviews. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Appl. 4(4), 103–111 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kessler, J.S., Nicolov, N.: Targeting sentiment expressions through supervised ranking of linguistic configurations. In: 3rd International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bandyopadhyay, S., Mallick, K.: A new path based hybrid measure for gene ontology similarity. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 11(1), 116–127 (2014). doi:10.1109/TCBB.2013.149
  11. 11.
    Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T.O., Sandner, P., Welpe, I.: Predicting elections with twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In: Proceedings of ICWSM (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B.R., Smith, N.A.: From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: ICWSM (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bermingham, A., Smeaton, A.F.: On using twitter to monitor political sentiment and predict election results. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment Analysis Where AI Meets Psychology (SAAIP 2011-IJCNLP), pp. 2–10, Chiang Mai, Thailand (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bakliwal, A., Foster, J., Puil, J.V.D., O’Brien, R., Tounsi, L., Hughes, M.: Sentiment analysis of political tweets: towards an accurate classifier. In: Proceedings of NAACL Workshop on Language Analysis in Social Media, pp. 49–58 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Riloff, E., Qadir, A., Surve, P., De Silva, L., Gilbert, N., Huang, R.: Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In: EMNLP 2013, pp. 704–714 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Di Caro, L., Grella, M.: Sentiment analysis via dependency parsing. Comput. Stan. Interfaces (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tan, L.K.W., Na, J.C., Theng, Y.L., Chang, K.: Phrase-level sentiment polarity classification using rule-based typed dependencies and additional complex phrases consideration. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 27(3), 650–666 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Marneffe, M., MacCartney, B., Manning, C.: Generating typed dependency parse from phrase structure parses. LREC (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gimpel, K., Schneider, N., O’Connor, B., Das, D., Mills, D., Eisenstein, J., Heilman, M., Yogatama, D., Flanigan, J., Smith, N.A.: Part-of-speech tagging for twitter: annotation, features, and experiments. In: Proceedings of ACL (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The LNM Institute of Information TechnologyJaipurIndia
  2. 2.Malaviya National Institute of TechnologyJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations