Adjunctive Endonasal Procedures with Dacryocystorhinostomy

  • Joseph Brunworth
  • Alkis James Psaltis
  • Peter-John Wormald
Chapter

Abstract

Considering the wide breadth of nasal disorders commonly encountered in the general population, it is not surprising to find overlap with patients presenting with lacrimal ailments. In fact, within the subset of patients in whom surgical intervention is deemed prudent, it is occasionally necessary to perform simultaneous endonasal procedures at the time of dacryocystorhinostomy. In addition to septal deviation requiring septoplasty for access to the lacrimal system, one must also assess for various other nasal diseases including turbinate hypertrophy, nasal polyposis, rhinosinusitis, and multiple other neighboring disease processes. Emphasis must be placed on proper preoperative evaluation of concurrent disease to ensure the surgical candidate is properly consented prior to the day of surgery.

References

  1. 1.
    Tanweer F, Mahkamova K, Harkness P. Nasolacrimal duct tumours in the era of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: literature review. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127:670–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaymakci M, Cikriklar HI, Pay G. The aetiology underlying sinus headaches. J Int Med Res. 2013;41:218–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dadgarnia MH, Atighechi S, Baradaranfar MH. The response to sodium valproate of patients with sinus headaches with normal endoscopic and CT findings. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267:375–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kari E, DelGaudio JM. Treatment of sinus headache as migraine: the diagnostic utility of triptans. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:2235–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wormald PJ. Powered endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Larygoscope. 2002;112:69–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:76–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wormald PJ, Tsirbas A. Investigation and treatment for functional and anatomical obstruction of the naso-lacrimal duct system. Clin Otolaryngol. 2004;29:352–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wormald PJ. Powered endoscopic DCR. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2006;39(3):539–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leibovitch I, Selva D, Tsirbas A, et al. Pediatric endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:1250–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mann BS, Wormald PJ. Endoscopic assessment of the dacryocystorhinostomy ostium after endoscopic surgery. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1172–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clement WA, White PS. Trends in turbinate surgery literature: a 35-year review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2001;26:124–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fradis M, Golz A, Danino J, et al. Inferior turbinectomy versus submucosal diathermy for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109:1040–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scheithauer MO. Surgery of the turbinates and “empty nose” syndrome. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;9:1–28.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Passàli D, Passàli FM, Damiani V, et al. Treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112:683–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rakover Y, Rosen G. A comparison of partial inferior turbinectomy and cryosurgery for hypertrophic inferior turbinates. J Laryngol Otol. 1996;110:732–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sapçi T, Sahin B, Karavus A, et al. Comparison of the effects of radiofrequency tissue ablation, CO2 laser ablation, and partial turbinectomy applications on nasal mucociliary functions. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:514–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    El Henawi Del D, Ahmed MR, Madian YT. Comparison between power-assisted turbinoplasty and submucosal resection in the treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2011;73:151–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee DH, Kim EH. Microdebrider-assisted versus laser-assisted turbinate reduction: comparison of improvement in nasal airway according to type of turbinate hypertrophy. Ear Nose Throat J. 2010;89:541–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gindros G, Kantas I, Balatsouras DG, et al. Comparison of ultrasound turbinate reduction, radiofrequency tissue ablation and submucosal cauterization in inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267:1727–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Joniau S, Wong I, Rajapaksa S, et al. Long-term comparison between submucosal cauterization and powered reduction of the inferior turbinates. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1612–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wormald PJ, Kew J, Van Hasselt CA. The intranasal anatomy of the nasolacrimal sac in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:307–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Unlu HH, Govsa F, Mutlu C. Anatomic guidelines for intranasal surgery of the lacrimal drainage system. Rhinology. 1997;35:11–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rebeiz EE, Shapshay S, Bowlds J, et al. Anatomic guidelines for dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope. 1992;102:1181–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wormald PJ, Nilssen E. Endoscopic DCR: the team approach. Hong Kong J Ophthalmol. 1998;1:71–4.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meltzer EO, Hamilos DL, Hadley JA, et al. Rhinosinusitis: establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:155–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Brunworth
    • 1
  • Alkis James Psaltis
    • 2
  • Peter-John Wormald
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Otolaryngology, Head Neck SurgeryUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations