Distinctive Mechanisms Regulating Corneal and Scleral Growth

  • Richard A. Stone
  • Ton Lin
  • Cheryl Capehart
  • Maureen G. Maguire
  • Gregor F. Schmid
Conference paper

Summary

To learn if the cornea adjusts passively to vitreous cavity expansion or if its growth is subject to an independent regulatory mechanism, chicks were raised under photoperiods with 12 or 24 hours of light. As previously described, continuous light rearing caused vitreous cavity enlargement, anterior chamber shallowing and corneal flattening compared to the other photoperiods. We previously found that, when assessed by optical or anatomical methods, the chick corneal surface area at 2 weeks of age was larger following rearing under a 12 hour light:dark photoperiod than under continuous light. With a spherical model for the chick corneal shape, optical methods suggest that corneal growth slows rather than arrests under continuous light, when vitreous cavity expansion is greatest. The photoperiod-related dissociation of vitreous cavity and corneal growth indicates that scleral and corneal expansion can be differentially regulated. Because of photoperiod dependency, neural mechanisms likely modulate post-natal corneal expansion.

Key words

Cornea Area Growth Photoperiod Chick 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Scott R, Grosvenor T (1993) Structural model for emmetropic an ` m es. Ophthal Physiol Opt 13: 41–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sorsby A, Benjamin B, Davey JB, Sheridan M, Tanner JM (1957) Emmetropia and its aberrations. A study in the optical components of the eye. Medical Research Council Special Report Series, No. 293. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, pp 1–84Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stone RA (1997) Neural mechanisms and eye growth control. In: Tokoro T (ed) Myopia Updates: Proceedings ofthe 6th International Conference on Myopia, Springer-Vodug, Tokyo, pp 241–254Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mutti DO, Zadnik K, Fusaro RE, Friedman NE, Sholtz RI, Adams AI (1998) Optical and structural development of the crystalline lens in childhood, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:l2V-l3]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li T, Troilo D, Glasser A, Howland HC (1995) Constant Iihtproduces severe cornea! flattening and hyperopia in chickens. Vision Res 35:l2O3–9Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stone RA, Lin T, Desai D, Capehart C (I 995) Photoperiod, early postnatal eye growth, and visual deprivation. Vision Res 35: 1195–1202Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wildsoet CF, Pettigrew JD (1988) Kainic acid-induced eye enlargement in chickens: differential effects on anterior and posterior segments. Inv}phthdmolÖmual8ol 29:3ll-l9Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ehrlich D, Sattayasai J, Zappia J, Barrington, M (1990) L ’’!selective oeurotoxiosou eye growth in the young chick. In: Bock G, Widdows K (’` modau 000ymnpnmium on myopia and the control of eye growth. Wiley, Chichester, pp 63–88Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lauber JK, Oishi T (1990) Kainic acid and formoguanamine c–mirnnmwotuUy- iudvocócyclemiouoiochicbu J Ocular Pharmacol 6: 151–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Troilo D, Gottlieb MD, Wallman J (1987) Visual deprivation causes myopia in chicks with optic nerve section, Curr Eye Res 6: 993–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stone RA, Lin T,CupchartC. Maguire MG, Schmid GF(l99D) jod dependency of yost-ouzaI corneal expansion. Invest OpbtúulmolVim3ciw 403Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eves H (1987) Geometry. In: Beyer WH (ed) CRC Handbook tticalSoiencux. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 152–64Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mandel! RB, Corzine JC, Klein SA (1998) Peripheral cornea! topography and the limbus. Invest OphtbalmuJVlo8ci39(4):8l086. Abstract nr4789Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Irving EL, Callender MG, Sivak JG (1995) Inducing ametroplas hatchling chicks by defocus–aperture effects and cylindrical lenses. Vision Res 35: 1 165–74Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schmid K, Wildsoet C (1997) Natural and imposed astigmatism and their relation to emmetropization in the chick. Exp Eye Res 64: 837–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith EL III, Huang J, Hung L-F (1997) Cylindrical spectacle lenses alter emmetropization and produce astigmatism in young monkeys. In: Tokoro T (ed) My pia Updates: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Myopia, Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 336–43Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Stone
    • 1
  • Ton Lin
    • 1
  • Cheryl Capehart
    • 1
  • Maureen G. Maguire
    • 1
  • Gregor F. Schmid
    • 2
  1. 1.Scheie Eye InstituteUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Institut de Recherches en OphtalmologieSionSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations