Advertisement

Technologies for Resources Oriented Agro-Sanitation System—Overview

  • Naoyuki Funamizu
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is an overview of the required technologies for resources oriented agro-sanitation system. The discussion includes the concept for building up the agro-sanitation system by selecting element technologies followed by the models for rural and urban area. The key points of the resources oriented sanitation are: (1) the feces, urine, and gray water are the important resources and properties of people; (2) technologies are used for improving their values; (3) recovered resources are used as agricultural resources. In the agro-sanitation system, separation of feces, urine, and gray water at the source is essential for resource recovery. And separated feces, urine and gray water are processed, respectively. The brief introduction of technologies for these resources’ recovery is given in this chapter.

Keywords

Resource-oriented sanitation Technologies for urine Feces and gray water 

References

  1. Almeida MC, Butler D, Friedler E (1999) At-source domestic wastewater quality. Wat Sci Tech Urban Water 1:49–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1462-0758(99)00008-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Del Porto D, Steinfeld C (1998) The composting toilet system book. Center for Ecological Pollution Prevention (CEPP), ConcordGoogle Scholar
  3. Ganrot Z, Dave G, Nilsson E (2007) Recovery of N and P from human urine by freezing, struvite precipitation and adsorption to zeolite and active carbon. Bioresour Technol 98(16):3112–3121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hanaeus J, Hellstrom D, Johansson E (1997) A study of urine separation in an ecological village in northern Sweden. Water Sci Technol 35:153–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0273-1223(97)00193-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harada H, Shimizu Y, Sato D, Miyagoshi Y, Matsui S, Matsuda T, Nagasaki T (2006) Development of a struvite-recovery plant from urine using a urine-diversion toilet. J Jpn Sci Water Environ 28(3):191–196 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hotta S, Funamizu N (2008) Inhibition factor of ammonification in stored urine with fecal contamination. Water Sci Technol 58(6):1187–1192.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huelgas A, Funamizu N (2010) Flat-plate submerged membrane bioreactor for the treatment of higher-load graywater. Desalination 250:162–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kakimoto T, Funamizu N (2007) Factors affecting the degradation of amoxicillin in composting toilet. Chemosphere 66:2214–2219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kakimoto T, Osawa T, Funamizu N (2007) Antibiotic effect of amoxicillin on the feces composting process and reactivation of bacteria by intermittent feeding of feces. Biores Technol 98:3555–3560.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lind B, Ban Z, Byden S (2000) Nutrient recovery from human urine by struvite crystallization with ammonia adsorption on zeolite and wollastonite. Biores Technol 73(2):169–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-8524(99)90157-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lind BB, Ban Z, Byden S (2001) Volume reduction and concentration of nutrients in human urine. Ecol Eng 16:561–566.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-8574(00)00107-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lopez Zavala MA, Funamizu N, Takakuwa T (2002a) Onsite wastewater differentiable treatment system: modeling approach. Water Sci Technol 46(6–7):317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lopez Zavala MA, Funamizu N, Takakuwa T (2002b) Characterization of feces for describing the aerobic biodegradation of feces. J Environ Syst Eng, JSCE, No. 720/VII-25:99–105Google Scholar
  14. Maiga Y, Moyenga D, Ushijima K, Sou M, Maiga AH (2014) Greywater characteristics in rural areas of the Sahelian region for reuse purposes: the case of Burkina Faso. Revue des Sciences de l’Eau (J Water Sci) 27(1):39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maurer M, Pronk W, Larsen TA (2006) Treatment processes for source separated urine. Water Res 40:3151–3166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.07.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Metcalf & Eddy (2003) Wastewater Engineering, 4th edn. McGraw- Hill, pp 1499–1501Google Scholar
  17. Metcalf & Eddy (2007) Water reuse. 995 and 959, McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  18. Udert KM, Fux C, Munster M, Larsen TA, Siegrist H, Gujer W (2003a) Nitrification and autotrophic denitrification of source-separated urine. Water Sci Technol 48(1):119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Udert KM, Larsen TA, Biebow M, Gujer W (2003b) Urea hydrolysis and precipitation dynamics in a urine-collecting system. Water Res 37(11):2571–2582.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00065-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ushijima K, Funamizu N, Nabeshima T, Hijikata N, Ito R, Sou M, Maiga AH, Sintawardani N (2015) The postmodern sanitation—agro-sanitation business model as a new policy. Water Policy 17(2):283–298.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2014.093CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Global Food ResourcesHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.Research Institute of Humanity and NatureKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations