Advertisement

Experiment of a Resource-Oriented Agro-Sanitation System for Urban Slum Area: Case of Indonesia

  • Neni Sintawardani
  • Ken Ushijima
  • Umi Hamidah
  • Yosuke Deguchi
  • Jovita Triastuti
  • Naoyuki Funamizu
  • Mitsuteru Irie
  • Tadaharu Ishikawa
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes case study of applicability assessment for resource-oriented agro-sanitation business for urban slum in Indonesia, based on interdisciplinary field survey, (1) economic feasibility assessment, (2) demand potential assessment, and (3) social acceptability. The value flow analysis evaluated garbage disposal cost and excreta disposal cost at 0.7 and 1.1%, respectively, of household income, which represents a reasonable cost to disposers. However, under the current disposal scheme, negative value due to excreta disposal to river appears to be passed on to downstream populations. The structure of this value flow indicates that little attention is paid to the negative externalities, indicating that a solution in this case may be difficult to obtain. The affordable initial cost of a new resource recycling system was evaluated and compared with the costs of a currently available compost toilet by evaluating equipment lifetimes and potential income streams available from the sale of human excrement fertilizers. To estimate a value for the human excrement fertilizer, real-world case study in Indonesia, in which money was paid in exchange for human urine, was referred to. The evaluated affordable initial cost derived was sufficiently comparable to the price of a cheaper composting toilet currently available in the market. This implies that such a resource recycling system is feasible even in an urban slum. Results of demand and supply assessment showed that if resource-oriented sanitation system was diffused, supply would excess demands in the circle of 32 km radius, therefore cost discussion should assume more than 32 km transportation. According to the results of case estimation of tea plantation, total cost for fertilizer provided by resource-oriented sanitation system is possibly competitive to the normal price of synthetic fertilizer. However, if compared to subsidized price for low-income farmers, it seems difficult to compete. Regarding social aspect, the context of Islamic law is important. Islamic authorities regarded the resource-oriented sanitation system as no problematic concept and acceptable in the context of Islamic law.

Keywords

Material flow Value flow Sustainable design Initial cost Urban slum 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST-CREST), the Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development of the Japan Science and Technology Agency and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JST-JICA-SATREPS), and JSPS KAKENHI Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S).

References

  1. Aramaki T, Thuy NTT (2010) Material flow analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus for regional nutrient management: case study in Haiphong, Vietnam. Sustain Food Water Alliance for Glob Sustain Book Series 18(6):391–399.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9914-3_38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartone CR (2000) Financial management of urban solid waste services: lessons from a decade of World Bank Lending, World Bank Partnership in Municipal Solid Waste Management workshopGoogle Scholar
  3. BPS (2005) Seri Kependudukan Jawa Barat Tahun 1920–2005. BPS, Jakarta, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  4. BPS-Kota Bandung (2004) Bandung Dalam Angka 2003 116–119Google Scholar
  5. FAO (2005) Fertilizer use in Indonesia, FAOGoogle Scholar
  6. Hosen N (2004) Behind the science: Fatwa of Majelis Ulama Indonesia (1975–1998). J Islamic Stud 15(2):147–179.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/15.2.147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gunawan M (1997) Market prospects for upland crops in Indonesia, the CGPRT Centre Working Paper Series 25. Regional co-ordination centre for research and development of coarse Grains, Pulses, Roots and Tuber Crops in the Humid Tropics of Asia and the Pacific (CGPRT), BogorGoogle Scholar
  8. Harada H, Adachi T, Fujii S, Lien NPH, Hai HT (2010) Phosphorus flow analysis in Hanoi focusing on wastewater, agriculture and stockbreeding. Environ Eng Res JSCE 47:465–474 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2002) Study on Method of Economic Evaluation in Development Studies. JICA, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2005) For international aid to capacity development of solid waste management in developing countriesGoogle Scholar
  11. Li S, Yuan Z, Bi J, Wu H (2010) Anthropogenic phosphorus flow analysis of Hefei City, China. Sci Total Environ 408(23):5715–5722.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.052 PMID:20863550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lopez Zavala MA, Funamizu N, Takakuwa T (2002) Onsite wastewater differentiable treatment system: modeling approach. Water Sci Technol 46(6–7):317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Metcalf & Eddy International Inc. in association with Brockman Tym International and TCGI Engineers (1998) Pasig river development plan, Final Report to ADB, vol 1. Metcalf & Eddy International Inc. in association with Brockman Tym International and TCGI Engineers, Quezon CityGoogle Scholar
  14. Tanaka N (1992) Environment of developing countries in Asia-Pacific, Thai (1). J Res Environ 28(11):1065–1076 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  15. Tsuzuki Y, Koottatep T, Rahman M D M, Ahmed F (2007) Preliminary study on pollutant discharge from domestic wastewater and pollutant load in the river: a comparative study between Japan, Thailand and Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of the water environment partnership in Asia (WEPA) Forum on “Water Environmental Governance in Asia”, Bangkok. Water Environment Partnership in Asia (WEPA), KanagawaGoogle Scholar
  16. Unisuga S, Watanabe T (2004) Present condition of environment control in Indonesia (2). Life Environ 49:57–62Google Scholar
  17. Ushijima K (2007) Study on water environment rehabilitation by introducing new toilet system in urban area of Southeast Asia. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Tokyo Institute of Technology,Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. Ushijima K, Irie M, Sintawardani N, Triastuti J, Ishikawa T (2008a) Field research on domestic wastewater from a slum in Bandung City. J Hydrosci Hydraul Eng 26(1):129–140Google Scholar
  19. Ushijima K, Irie M, Sintawardani N, Triastuti J, Ishikawa T (2008b) Practical model design of sustainable sanitation system in urban slum. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Sustainable Sanitation, Changchun. Northeast Normal University (NENU), Changchun, pp 27–33Google Scholar
  20. Ushijima K, Irie M, Sintawardani N, Triastuti J, Ishikawa T, Funamizu N (2011) Sanitation model for urban slum in Southeast Asia. In: Proceedings of IWA 2nd development congress, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. IWA, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Ushijima K, Ito K, Ito R, Funamizu N (2013a) Greywater treatment by slanted soil system. Ecol Eng 50:62–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ushijima K, Irie M, Sintawardani N, Triastuti J, Hamidah U, Ishikawa T, Funamizu N (2013b) Sustainable design of sanitation system based on material and value flow analysis for urban slum in Indonesia. Frontiers Environ Sci Eng 7(1):120–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0460-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Winblad U, Simpson-Hebert M (2004) Ecological sanitation—revised and enlarged edition. SEI, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  24. World Bank (2003) Indonesia environment monitor 2003. World Bank Indonesia Office, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  25. Yamamura T (1987) Comparison analysis on solid waste data of Indonesia and Japan. J Solid Liquid Waste 17(7):15–23Google Scholar
  26. Zhou C, Liu J, Wang R, Yang W, Jin J (2010) Ecological-economic assessment of ecological sanitation development in the cities of Chinese Loess Plateau. Ecol Complexity 7(2):162–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neni Sintawardani
    • 1
  • Ken Ushijima
    • 2
  • Umi Hamidah
    • 1
  • Yosuke Deguchi
    • 3
  • Jovita Triastuti
    • 1
  • Naoyuki Funamizu
    • 4
    • 5
  • Mitsuteru Irie
    • 6
  • Tadaharu Ishikawa
    • 7
  1. 1.Research Unit for Clean TechnologyIndonesian Institute of SciencesBandungIndonesia
  2. 2.Northern Regional Building Research Institute, Hokkaido Research Organization (HRO)AsahikawaJapan
  3. 3.Nippon Koei Co., LtdTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Graduate School of Global Food ResourcesHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  5. 5.Research Institute of Humanity and Nature, Motoyama KamigamoKyotoJapan
  6. 6.Alliance for Research on North Africa, University of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
  7. 7.Department of Environment and TechnologyTokyo Institute of TechnologyYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations