Advertisement

Treatment of Greywater by Geotextile Filter and Intermittent Sand Filtration

  • Sebastian Ignacio Charchalac Ochoa
  • Ken Ushijima
  • Nowaki Hijikata
  • Naoyuki Funamizu
Chapter

Abstract

Intermittent sand filtration (ISF) is an efficient system for treatment of greywater; however, the high quality of effluent and the simple setup contrast with the high failure rate due to clogging of surface layers. The efficacy of several polypropylene nonwoven geotextiles (apparent opening size from 0.10 to 0.18 mm) used as primary treatment filters to remove suspended particles from domestic greywater and the effects of this pretreatment in the performance of fine and small media size (0.3 and 0.6 mm) ISFs was examined. Results showed geotextile achieved SS removal rates from 25 to 85% and COD from 3 to 30%; although the portion larger than 75 µm was removed at higher rates (55–90%), particles smaller than the nominal pore size of the filter were also captured. Geotextile used as pretreatment resulted in improvement of lifetime of the ISFs over an experimental run of 60 days. The vertical profile of volatile organic matter in the ISFs was evaluated at the end of the experiment, and it showed a clear reduction in the accumulation of organic material on the top layer of the ISFs, effectively avoiding its early failure by accumulation of solids.

Keywords

Greywater Intermittent sand filter Geotextile Water reuse 

References

  1. Almeida MC, Butler D, Friedler E (1999) At-source domestic wastewater quality. Urban Water 1(1):49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Charchalac Ochoa SI, Ushijima K, Hijikata N, Funamizu N (2015) Treatment of domestic greywater by geotextile filter and intermittent sand filtration bioreactor. J Water Reuse Desalin 5(1):39–49.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2014.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christova Boal D, Eden RE, McFarlane S (1996) An investigation into greywater reuse for urban residential properties. Desalination 106:391–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(96)00134-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darby JL, Tchobanoglous G, Asri No M, Maciolek D (1996) Shallow intermittent sand filtration: performance evaluation. Small Flows J 2:3–14Google Scholar
  6. Eriksson E, Auffarth K, Henze M, Ledin A (2002) Characteristics of grey wastewater. Urban Water 4:85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedler E (2004) Quality of individual domestic greywater streams and its implication for on-site treatment and reuse possibilities. Environ Technol 25:997–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedler E, Hadari M (2006) Economic feasibility of on-site greywater reuse in multi-storey buildings. Desalination 190:221–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Funamizu N, Mizukubo T, Lopez Zavala MA, Takakuwa T (2002) Fractioning gray-water in the differentiable onsite-wastewater treatment system. In: Proceedings of XXVIII Congreso Interamericano de Ingeniería Sanitaria y Ambiental, Cancún, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  10. Gajurel DR, Li Z, Otterpohl R (2003) Investigation on the effectiveness of source control sanitation concepts including pre-treatment with Rottebehaelter. Water Sci Technol 48:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hua GF, Zhu W, Zhao LF, Huang JY (2010) Clogging pattern in vertical-flow constructed wetlands: insight from a laboratory study. J Hazard Mater 180:668–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huelgas A, Funamizu N (2010) Flat-plate submerged membrane bioreactor for the treatment of higher-load graywater. Desalination 250:162–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keraita B, Drechsel P, Konradsen F, Vreugdenhil RC (2008) Potential of simple filters to improve microbial quality of irrigation water used in urban vegetable farming in Ghana. J Environ Sci Health Pt A: Environ Sci Eng Toxic Hazard Subst Control 43:749–755.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520801959948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Korkut EN (2003) Geotextiles as biofilm attachment baffles for wastewater treatment. Ph.D. Dissertation. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Drexel UniversityGoogle Scholar
  15. Kotha KK (2001) Modification of waste water treatment using geotextiles. MSc Thesis. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Texas Tech UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Langergraber G, Haberl R, Laber J, Pressl A (2003) Evaluation of substrate clogging processes in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 48:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leverenz HL, Tchobanoglous G, Darby JL (2009) Clogging in intermittently dosed sand filters used for wastewater treatment. Water Res 43:695–705.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. López Zavala MA, Funamizu N, Takakuwa T (2002) Onsite wastewater differentiable treatment system: modeling approach. Water Sci Technol 46:317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Managaki S, Kojima S, Harada A, Nanada N, Tanaka H, Takada H (2005) Development of analytical method of linear alkylbenzenesulfonates and their degradation intermediates by high performance liquid chromatography equipped with tandem mass spectrometry and its application to major Japanese rivers. J Japan Soc Water Environ 28:621–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marino RJ (2006) Geotextile filter treatment of combined sewer discharges. Ph.D. Dissertation. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Drexel UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Marino RJ, Walton J, Cheng SC, Martin JP (2006) Geotextile behavior relevant to filtering low density suspended organic particles. In: Proceedings from the 8th international geosynthetics conference, Yokohama, Japan. Millpress, Rotterdam, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  22. Morel A, Diener S (2006) Greywater management in low and middle-income countries, review of different treatment systems for households or neighborhoods. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG), DübendorfGoogle Scholar
  23. Mulligan CN, Davarpanah N, Fukue M, Inoue T (2009) Filtration of contaminated suspended solids for the treatment of surface water. Chemosphere 74:779–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mungray AK, Kumar P (2009) Fate of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in the environment: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 63:981–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reed SC, Crites RW, Middlebrooks EJ (1995) Natural systems for waste management and treatment. McGraw-Hill, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodgers M, Mulqueen J, Healy MG (2004) Surface clogging in an intermittent stratified sand filter. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1827–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodgers M, Walsh G, Healy MG (2010) Different depth intermittent sand filters for laboratory treatment of synthetic wastewater with concentrations close to measured septic tank effluent. J Environ Sci Health Pt A: Toxic/Hazard Subst Environ Eng 46:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rolland L, Molle P, Liénard A, Bouteldja F, Grasmick A (2009) Influence of the physical and mechanical characteristics of sands on the hydraulic and biological behaviors of sand filters. Desalination 248:998–1007.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.10.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roy C, Auger R, Chénier R (1998) Use of non woven textile in intermittent filters. Water Sci Technol 38:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Silva Vieira A, Weeber M, Ghisi E (2013) Self-cleaning filtration: a novel concept for rainwater harvesting systems. Resour Conserv Recy 78:67–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spychala M, Blazejewski R (2003) Sand filter clogging by septic tank effluent. Water Sci Technol 48:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Standard D4491-99a (Reapproved 2004) Standard test methods for water permeability of geotextiles by permittivity. American Society for Testing and Materials USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Ushijima K, Ito K, Ito R, Funamizu N (2013) Greywater treatment by slanted soil system. Ecol Eng 50:62–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Winter KJ, Goetz D (2003) The impact of sewage composition on the soil clogging phenomena of vertical flow constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 48:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao L, Zhu W, Tong W (2009) Clogging processes caused by biofilm growth and organic particle accumulation in lab-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands. J Environ Sci (China) 21:750–757.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62336-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Ignacio Charchalac Ochoa
    • 1
  • Ken Ushijima
    • 2
  • Nowaki Hijikata
    • 3
  • Naoyuki Funamizu
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Division of Engineering Sciences, Western Regional Center (CUNOC)University of San Carlos of Guatemala (USAC)QuetzaltenangoGuatemala
  2. 2.Northern Regional Building Research InstituteHokkaido Research Organization (HRO)MemuroJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of EngineeringHokkaido UniversitySapporo CityJapan
  4. 4.Graduate School of Global Food ResourcesHokkaido UniversitySapporo CityJapan
  5. 5.Research Institute of Humanity and NatureKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations