Mangrove Rehabilitation in Seribu Islands at the Crossroad of Awareness and Tokenism

  • Syarifah Aini Dalimunthe
  • Intan Adhi Perdana Putri
Chapter
Part of the Disaster Risk Reduction book series (DRR)

Abstract

As a part of Indonesia’s commitment to fight climate change, the country is committed to reduce emission by 41 % in 2020 (with international support). Out of the various tools developed to support this goal, mangrove rehabilitation is one. Mangrove provides a broad array of ecological services. One of its services is in producing significant amount of organic materials that functions as carbon absorber. The study was carried out in Seribu Islands, a group of 105 small islands located along North Jakarta Bay. The local government aims to plant 1.5 million mangroves. Therefore, through tourism and corporate social responsibility (CSR), voluntary mangrove rehabilitation is mushrooming. Tourists can purchase mangrove seedlings, 2 USD each, from the local community then plant them along the coastline. Although this is officially promoted by local authorities in collaboration with coastal communities and private sector, current mangrove rehabilitation and planting can be seen as tokenism rather than an awareness. Planting mangrove requires a comprehensive planning and maintenance. However, given the favor of voluntary activity, it is rarely rehabilitation and sustainability taken into account. Tokenism may hinder the country’s mitigation and adaptation toward climate change and, at the same time, may hinder the use of ecosystem services as part of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) in Indonesia.

Keywords

Climate change Mangrove rehabilitation Participation Tokenism 

References

  1. Alongi DM (2008) Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global change. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76:1–13Google Scholar
  2. Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Plan Assoc 35(4)Google Scholar
  3. Bakosurtanal (2009) Indonesian mangroves map (in Indonesian). The national coordinating body for survey and mappingGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck MW (2014) Coasts at risk: an assessment of coastal risks and the role of environmental solutions. A joint publication of the United Nations university-institute for environment and human security. The Nature Conservancy and the Coastal Resources CenterGoogle Scholar
  5. BNPB and BAPPENAS (2010) National action plan for disaster risk reduction. BNPB, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  6. BPK-The Audit Board of The Republic of Indonesia (2008) Auditing of 2nd semester of 2007 year budgeting on Forest and Land Rehabilitation Program (in Indonesian). BPK, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  7. BPLHD of DKI Jakarta (2015) Regional environmental status (SLHD) (in Indonesian). BPLHD DKI Jakarta, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  8. BPS Kepulauan Seribu (2014) Kepulauan Seribu in figures. BPS Kepulauan Seribu, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  9. Fauzi A, Buchary E (2002) A socioeconomic perspective of environmental degradation at Kepulauan Seribu Marine National Park, Indonesia. Coast Manag 30:167–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giri C, Zhu Z, Tieszen L, Singh A, Gillete S, Kelmelis J (2008) Mangrove Forest Distribution and Dynamics (1975-2005) of the Tsunami - Affected Region of Asia. J Biogeogr 35:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guha-Sapir D, Hoyois P, Below R (2015) Annual disaster statistical review 2014: the numbers and trends. CRED, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  12. Haryanto A (2013) Effectiveness of mangrove rehabilitation on pramuka island, seribu archipelago. Bogor Agricultural University, BogorGoogle Scholar
  13. ICCSR (2010) Scientific basis analysis and projection of sea level rise and extreme weather event, Indonesia climate change sectoral map. BAPPENAS, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  14. Kathiresan K, Bingham B (2001) Biology of mangroves and mangroves ecosystems. Adv Mar Biol 40:81–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kusumawardani K, Rahmawati L (2014, December) Badan Pengelola REDD+: One map, The courage Form Government (in Indonesian). http://www.reddplus.go.id/berita/berita-redd/2435-satu-peta-bentuk-keberanian-pemerintah
  16. Langenheim J (2015, June 15) The Guardian. Retrieved from Hope for Indonesia’s valuable but threatened mangroves. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2015/jun/17/hope-for-indonesias-valuable-but-threatened-mangroves
  17. McKenzie-Mohr D, Schultz PW (2014) Choosing effective behavior change tools. Soc Mark Q 20(1):35–46. doi:10.1177/1524500413519257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Media Lingkungan (2015, March 15) Pelestarian Lingkungan, Toyota Tanam 10 Ribu Pohon Mangrove. Retrieved from Media Lingkungan. http://medialingkungan.com/index.php/component/k2/item/1243-pelestarian-lingkungan-toyota-tanam-10-ribu-pohon-mangrove
  19. Ministry of Environment (2007) Study on Economic Valuation of Natural Resources and Protected Areas. Ministry of Environment, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  20. Ministry of Environment (2010) Indonesia Second National Communication under UNFCCC. Minsitry of Environment, Republic of Indonesia, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  21. Ministry of Environment and Forestry (2014) The Fifth National Report of Indonesia to The Convention on Biological Diversity. Ministry of Environment and Forestry, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  22. Miraftab F (2004) Invited and invented spaces of participation: neoliberal citizenship and feminists' expanded notion of politics'. Wagadu 1:1–7Google Scholar
  23. Murdiyarso D, Donato D, Kauffman D, Kurnianto JB, Stidham S, Kanninen M (2009) Carbon storage in mangrove and peatland ecosystems: A preliminary account from plots in Indonesia. CIFOR, BogorGoogle Scholar
  24. Pillai P, Phillips B, Priya S, Ahmed K, Wang L (2010) Climate Risks and Adaptation in Asian Coastal Megacities: a synthesis report. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Saeger P, Hegerl E, Davie J (1983) Global status of Mangrove ecosystems. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  26. Saifa FF (2009) Assessment on the implementation of spatial plan as a tool for disaster risk prevention a case of Banda Aceh Aceh province. Erasmus University, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Stern PS, Dietz T, Karlof L (1993) Values orientation, gender, and environmental concern. Environ Behav 25(3):322–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. UN (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. United Nations document A/CONF.224/L.2. Available at http://www.wcdrr.org/uploads/Sendai_Framework_for_Disaster_Risk_Reduction_2015-2030.pdf
  29. UNESCO (2000) Reducing megacity impacts on the coastal environment – alternative livelihoods and waste management in Jakarta and the Seribu Islands. Coastal region and small Island papers 6, UNESCO, Paris, 59 pp. Available at http://www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/mega.pdf
  30. UNU-EHS and Alliance Development Works (2014) World risk report 2014. Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft and United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security. Available at http://i.unu.edu/media/ehs.unu.edu/news/4070/11895.pdf
  31. Ward PJ, Marfai MA, Poerbandono, Aldrian E (2012) Climate adaptation in the city of Jakarta. In: Jeroen A, Botzen W, Bowman MJ, Ward PJ, Dircke P (eds) Climate adaptation and flood risk in coastal cities. Earthscan, New York, pp 285–300Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syarifah Aini Dalimunthe
    • 1
  • Intan Adhi Perdana Putri
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Center for PopulationIndonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI)JakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations