Advertisement

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy

  • Charilaos Papafragkakis
  • Sayam Thaiudom
  • Manoop S. Bhutani
Chapter

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and biopsy (FNB) has been widely accepted as a fundamental procedure for the diagnosis and staging of lesions of the gastrointestinal tract or non-gastrointestinal lesions within reach of the aspiration needle. EUS-FNA has been used in lesions of the esophagus, mediastinal lesions, lymph node (LN) sampling, lung cancer diagnosis and other less common conditions (such as tuberculosis and sarcoidosis), gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions, pancreatic solid cystic lesions and neuroendocrine tumors, liver and bile duct lesions (such as cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma), rectal and pelvic lesion, and lesions of extra-gastrointestinal organs (such as the adrenals and the prostate). Continued improvements in the technology and the technical aspects of EUS-guided FNA and FNB aim to improve the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity and at the same time reduce the adverse events associated with the procedure. This chapter focuses on common technical aspects of EUS-FNA and FNB, such as the choice of needle and use of the stylet and suction, and performs a short review of the current applications of EUS-guided FNA in gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal lesions, along with a brief review of the adverse events that have been associated with the procedure.

Keywords

Endoscopic ultrasound Fine needle aspiration Biopsy 

References

  1. 1.
    Madhoun MF, Wani SB, Rastogi A, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2013;45:86–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Affolter KE, Schmidt RL, Matynia AP, et al. Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:1026–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Kakutani H, et al. A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009;2009:6.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/546390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berzoza M, Villa N, El-Serag H, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided 22-gauge core needle with standard 25-gauage fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. Endosc Ultrasound. 2015;4:28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Attilli F, Petrone G, Abdulkader I, et al. Accuracy and inter-observer agreement of the Procore 25-gauge needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue core biopsy. Dig Liver Dis. 2015;47:943–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uehara H, Sueyoshi H, Takada R, et al. Optimal number of needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic lesions. Pancreatology. 2015;15:392–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Varadarajulu S. Objective assessment of reasons for needle change during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Dig Endosc. 2015;27(6):714.  https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12500.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wani S, Muthusamy R, Komanduri S. EUS-guided tissue acquisition: an evidence-based approach (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:939–59.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wani S. Basic techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: role of a stylet and suction. Endosc Ultrasound. 2014;3:17–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wani S, Early D, Kunkel J, et al. Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:328–35.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sahai AV, Paquin SC, Gariepy G. A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet. Endoscopy. 2010;42:900–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wani S, Gupta N, Gaddam S, et al. A comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with and without a stylet. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:2409–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Paquin SC, Gariepy G, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology results with and without the stylet in 3364 cases. Dig Endosc. 2013;25:303–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rastogi A, Wani S, Gupta N, et al. A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:58–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee JK, Choi JH, Lee KH, et al. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:745–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhutani MS. Endoscopic ultrasound comes of age: mature, established and here to stay! Endosc Ultrasound. 2014;3:143–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Villa NA, Berzosa M, Wallace MB, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: the wet suction technique. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016;5:17–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Attam R, Arain MA, Bloechl SJ, et al. “Wet suction technique (WEST)”: a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1401–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bhutani MS, Suryaprassad S, Moezzi J, et al. Improved technique for performing endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of lymph nodes. Endoscopy. 1999;31:550–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Puri R, Vilmann P, Saftoiou A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:499–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, et al. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:319–31.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hebert-Magee S, Bae S, Varadarajulu S, et al. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 2013;24:159–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmidt RL, Witt BL, Matynia AP, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:872–82.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wani S, Mullady D, Early D, et al. The clinical impact of immediate on site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic mass: final results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:AB192–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Norton ID, Clain J, et al. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration on lymph node staging in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:751–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vazquez-Sequeiros E. Nodal staging: number or site of nodes? How to improve accuracy? Is FNA always necessary? Junctional tumors-what’s N and what’s M? Endoscopy. 2006;38(S1):s4–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Levy M, Clain JE, et al. Routine versus selective EUS-guided FNA approach for preoperative nodal staging of esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:204–11.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Santo E, Barkay O, Ross W, Bhutani MS. Advanced esophageal cancer. In: Bhutani MS, Deutsch JC, editors. EUS pathology with digital anatomy correlation. Textbook and atlas. Shelton: People’s Medical Publishing House-USA; 2010. p. 25–32.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim GH, Cho YK, Kim EY, et al. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:347–54.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nagula SPK, Aslanian HR, Bucobo JC, et al. EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) vs. EUS-fine needle biopsy (FNB) for solid mass lesions: interim analysis of a large multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:AB357–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weirsema MJ, Vilmann P, Gioavannini M, et al. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1087–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hunt GC, Rader AE, Faigel DO. A comparison of EUS features between CD-117 positive GI stromal tumors and CD-117 negative GI spindle cell tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:469–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hwang JH, Rulyak SJ. Subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract. In: Bhutani MS, Deutsch JC, editors. EUS pathology with digital anatomy correlation. Textbook and atlas. Shelton: People’s Medical Publishing House-USA; 2010. p. 79–94.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Debol SM, Stanley MW, MAllery S, et al. Glomus tumor of the stomach: cytologic diagnosis by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;28:316–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Prematilleke IV, Piris J, Shah KA. Fine needle aspiration cytology of a granular cell tumor of the oesophagus. Cytopathology. 2004;15:120–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Savides TJ. EUS for mediastinal lymph nodes and masses. In: Bhutani MS, Deutsch JC, editors. EUS pathology with digital anatomy correlation. Textbook and atlas. Shelton: People’s Medical Publishing House-USA; 2010. p. 117–28.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Levy MJ, Jondal ML, Clain J, et al. Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided Tru-Cut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:101–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wildi SM, Judson MA, Fraig M, et al. Is endosonography guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for sarcoidosis as good as we think? Thorax. 2004;59:794–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Savides TJ, Gress FG, Wheat LJ, et al. Dysphagia due to mediastinal granulomas: diagnosis with endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 2000;95:2278–84.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kramer H, Nieuwenhuis JA, Groen HJ, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosed by esophageal endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8:272–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fazel A, Moezardalan K, Varadarajulu S, et al. The utility and safety of EUS-guided FNA in the evaluation of duplication cysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:575–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Devereaux BM, LeBlanc JK, Yousif E, et al. Clinical utility of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of mediastinal masses in the absence of known pulmonary malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:397–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kramer H, Koeter GH, Sleijfer DT, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with mediastinal abnormalities and previous extrathoracic malignancy. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:559–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ribeiro A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema LM, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of lymphoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:485–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Annema JT, Veselic M, Rabe KF. EUS-guided FNA of centrally located lung tumors following a non-diagnostic bronchoscopy. Lung Cancer. 2005;48:357–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lococo P, Cesario A, Attili F, et al. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pleural effusion for the staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17:237–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Weston BR, Bhutani MS. Optimizing diagnostic yield for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions: a technical review. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;9:352–63.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dumonceau JM, Polkowski M, Larghi A, et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2011;43:897–912.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Dewitt J, McGreevy K, Sherman DS, et al. Utility of repeated EUS at a tertiary referral center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:610–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Eloubeidi MA, Varadarajulu S, Desai S, et al. Value of repeat endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for suspected pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:567–70.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Adler DG, Jacobson BC, Davila RE, et al. ASGE guideline: complications of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:8–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Katamuna A, Maguchi H, Hashigo S, et al. Tumor seeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of cancer in the body of the pancreas. Endoscopy. 2012;44:E160–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fritscher-Ravens A, Brand L, Knofel WT, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for focal pancreatic lesions in patients with normal parenchyma and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2768–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA. Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:728–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Larghi A, Capurso G, Carnuccio A, et al. Ki-67 grading of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on histological samples obtained by EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:570–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Unno J, Kanno A, Masamune A, et al. The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on the World Health Organization classification. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:1367–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Hikichi T, et al. Efficacy of ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grading. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:8118–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Brugge WR. Diagnosis and management of cystic lesions of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;6:3375–88.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Khashab MA, Kim K, Lennon AM, et al. Should we do EUS/FNA on patients with pancreatic cysts? The incremental diagnostic yield of EUS over CT/MRI for prediction of cystic neoplasms. Pancreas. 2013;42:717–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Levy MJ, Clain JE. Evaluation and management of cystic pancreatic tumors; emphasis on the role of EUS FNA. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:639–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Lee LS, Saltzman JR, Brounds BC, et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of complications and their predictors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:231–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Thosani N, Thosani S, Qiao W, et al. Role of EUS-FNA-based cytology in the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:2756–66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Scheiman JM, Hwang JH, Moayyedi P. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:824–848.e22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Soweid AM, Skoury AM. Endoscopic ultrasonography in intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. In: Bhutani MS, Deutsch JC, editors. EUS pathology with digital anatomy correlation. Textbook and atlas. Shelton: People’s Medical Publishing House-USA; 2010. p. 191–204.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Maire F, Couvelard A, Hammel P, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: the preoperative value of cytological and histopathological diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:701–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Brugge WR. Approaches to the drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2004;20:488–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Konda VJ, Meining A, Jamil LH, et al. A pilot study of in vivo identification of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy under endosonographic guidance. Endoscopy. 2013;45:1006–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Belsley NA, Pitman MB, Lauwers GY, et al. Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: limitations and pitfalls of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer. 2008;114:102–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Jani N, Dewitt J, Eloubeidi M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: a multicenter experience. Endoscopy. 2008;40:200–3.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Shimosegawa T, Chari ST, Frulloni L, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis: guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology. Pancreas. 2011;40:352–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kanno A, Ishida K, Hamada S, et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-FNA by using a 22-gauge needle based on the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:594–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ishikawa T, Itoh A, Kawashima H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the differentiation of type 1 and type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:3883–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Singh P, Mukhopadhyay P, Bhatt B, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound versus CT scan for detection of the metastases to the liver. Results of a prospective comparative study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:367–73.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hollerbach S, Willert J, Topalidis T, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of liver lesions: histological and cytological assessment. Endoscopy. 2003;35:743–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Singh P, Erickson RA, Mukhopadhyay P, et al. EUS for detection of the hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:265–73.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Stavropoulos SN, Im GY, Jlayer Z, et al. High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:310–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lee S, Seo DW, Paik WH, et al. Ethanol lavage of huge hepatic cysts by using EUS guidance and a percutaneous approach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:1014–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Singhal S, Changela K, Lane D, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepatic and perihilar abscess drainage: an evolving technique. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2014;7:93–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wallace MB, Krishna M. Liver lesions. In: Bhutani MS, Deutsch JC, editors. EUS pathology with digital anatomy correlation. Textbook and atlas. Shelton: People’s Medical Publishing House-USA; 2010. p. 287–98.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Ben-Menachem T, et al. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Standards of Practice Committee. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of patients with biliary neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:167–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Navaneethan U, Njei B, Venkatesh PG, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma as the etiology of biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2015;3:209–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Mohamadnejad M, DeWitt JM, Sherman S, et al. Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:71–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Tellez FI, Bernal-Mendez AR, Guerrero-Vazquez CG, et al. Diagnostic yield of EUS-guided tissue acquisition as a first-line approach in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1294–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gleeson FC, Rajan E, Levy MJ, et al. EUS-guided FNA of regional lymph nodes in patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:438–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Heimbach JK, Sanchez W, Rosen CB, et al. Trans-peritoneal fine needle aspiration biopsy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with disease dissemination. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:356–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Weilert F, Bhat YM, Binmoeller KF, et al. EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant obstruction: results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:197–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Storch I, Gomez C, Contreras F, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein invasion, masquerading as pancreatic mass, diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:789–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Hammoud GM, Almashhrawi A, Ibdah JA. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of hepatic, gallbladder and biliary tract lesions. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;6:420–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Srinivasan R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of peritoneal nodules in patients with ascites of unknown cause. Endoscopy. 2011;43:1010–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Wardeh R, Lee JG, Gu M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided paracentesis of ascitic fluid: a morphologic study with ultrasonographic correlation. Cancer Cytopathol. 2011;119:27–36.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Sadamoto Y, Kubo H, Harada N, et al. Preoperative diagnosis and staging of gallbladder carcinoma by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:536–41.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the evaluation of gallbladder masses. Endoscopy. 2005;37:751–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Choi JH, Lee SS, Choi JH, et al. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Endoscopy. 2014;46:656–61.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Roberts KJ, McCulloch N, Sutcliffe R, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound assessment of lesions of the ampulla of Vater is of particular value in low-grade dysplasia. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15:18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Fritscher-Ravens A, Topalidis T. Splenic lesions. In: Bhutani MS, Deutsch JC, editors. EUS pathology with digital anatomy correlation. Textbook and atlas. Shelton: People’s Medical Publishing House-USA; 2010. p. 299–311.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Fritscher-Ravens A, Mylonaki M, Pates A, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of focal lesions of the spleen. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1022–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Handa U, Tiwari A, Singhal N, et al. Utility of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in splenic lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41:1038–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Eloubeidi MA, Black RK, Tamhane A, et al. A large single-center experience of EUS-guided FNA of the left and right adrenal glands: diagnostic utility and impact on patient management. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:745–53.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Martinez M, LeBlanc J, Al-Haddad M, et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration evaluation adrenal gland enlargement or mass. World J Nephrol. 2014;3:92–100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Knight CS, Eloubeidi MA, Crowe R, et al. Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of colorectal carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41:1031–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Amin K, Olyaee M, Tawfik O, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration as a diagnostic and staging tool for rectal and perirectal lesions-an institute experience. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2013;17:493–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Mohamadnejad M, Al-Haddad MA, Sherman S, et al. Utility of EUS-guided biopsy of extramural pelvic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:146–51.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Rzouq F, Brown J, Fan F, et al. The utility of lower endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic lesions. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48:127–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Artifon ELA, Franzini TAP, Kumar A, et al. EUS-guided FNA facilitates the diagnosis of retroperitoneal endometriosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:620–2.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Artifon ELA, Sakai P, Bhutani MS. Prostate lesions. In: Bhutani MS, Deutsch JC, editors. EUS pathology with digital anatomy correlation. Textbook and atlas. Shelton: People’s Medical Publishing House-USA; 2010. p. 387–96.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Gleeson FC, Clain JE, Karnes RJ, et al. Endoscopic-ultrasound-guided tissue sampling facilitates the detection of local recurrence and extra pelvic metastasis in pelvic urologic malignancy. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012;2012:6.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/219521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Wang KX, Ben QW, Jin ZD, et al. Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:283–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Levy MJ, Norton ID, Clain JE, et al. Prospective study of bacteremia and complications with EUS FNA of rectal and perirectal lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:684–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Janssen J, Konig K, Knop-Hammad V, et al. Frequency of bacteremia after linear EUS of the upper GI tract with and without FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:339–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Guarner-Argente C, Shah P, Buchner A, et al. Use of antimicrobials for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective, comparative analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:81–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Khashab MA, Chithadi KV, Acosta RD, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:81–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charilaos Papafragkakis
    • 1
  • Sayam Thaiudom
    • 1
  • Manoop S. Bhutani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and NutritionUT MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations