Social and Epistemological Dimensions of Learning Among Nayaka Hunter-Gatherers

  • Danny NavehEmail author
Part of the Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series book series (RNMH)


This chapter explores patterns of knowing and learning, among Nayaka hunter-gatherers (South India). I will argue that knowing and learning is embedded within two main contexts. One is personal experimentation, which often involves processes of trial and error. The second context is engagement with others in which learning is not a singularized event and knowledge is not objectified out of actual experience and actual relations. In both contexts, learning is characterized by firsthand experience, which includes adults’ appreciation of the need; children have to learn for themselves through direct experience. The chapter draws special attention to the importance of the epistemological aspect in social learning, the use of questions and patterns of classification among the Nayaka and other hunter-gatherer groups.


Social learning Epistemology Nayaka Hunter-gatherers Childhood 



I thank the Nayaka, who accepted me into their lives and enabled me to learn through shared experiences about the way they get to know their world. I thank Nurit Bird-David for her helpful and constructive comments. I thank Peter Gardner for additional constructive comments and for his consistent encouragement to write about this matter. His encouragement played a vital and central role in the preparation of this chapter. I would also like to thank Hideaki Terashima and Barry Hewlett for setting up the superb workshop on social learning among hunter-gatherers in Kobe Gakuin University. This workshop was a true source for inspiration and idea exchange. I would also like to thank them for their helpful comments.


  1. Arhem K (1996) The cosmic food web: human-nature relatedness in the northwest Amazon. In: Pălsson G, Descola P (eds) Nature and society: anthropological perspectives. Routledge, London, pp 185–204Google Scholar
  2. Barnard A (2000) The hunter-gatherer mode of thought. Anales de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Buenos Aires (Sept):7–24Google Scholar
  3. Bird-David N (1990) The giving environment: another perspective on the economic system of gatherer-hunters. Curr Anthropol 31(2):183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird-David N (1999) “Animism” revisited: personhood, environment, and relational epistemology. Curr Anthropol 40(suppl):s67–s91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird-David N (2004a) Illness-images and joined beings: a critical Nayaka perspective on Inter-corporeality. Soc Anthropol 12(3):325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird-David N (2004b) No past, no present: a critical Nayaka perspective on cultural remembering. Am Ethnol 31(3):406–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bird-David N (2005) The property of relations: modern notions, Nayaka contexts. In: Widlok T, Wolde T (eds) Property and equality: ritualisation, sharing, egalitarianism. Berghahn Books, Oxford, pp 201–216Google Scholar
  8. Bird-David N (2006) Animistic epistemology: why some hunter-gatherers do not depict animals. Ethnos 71(1):33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brightman R (1993) Grateful prey: Rock Cree human-animal relationships. California University Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  10. Draper P (1976) Social and economic constraints on child life among the !Kung. In: Lee RB, DeVore I (eds) Kalahari hunter–gatherers: studies of the !Kung San and their neighbors. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 199–217Google Scholar
  11. Ellen R (1996) Introduction. In: Ellen R, Fukui T (eds) Redefining nature: ecology, culture, and domestication. Berg, Oxford, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  12. Endicott KM (1979) Batek negrito religion: the world view and rituals of a hunting and gathering people of peninsular Malaysia. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner PM (1966) Symmetric respect and memorate knowledge: the structure and ecology of individualistic culture. Southwest J Anthropol 22:389–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gardner PM (2000) Bicultural versatility as a frontier adaptation among Paliyan foragers of South India. Edwin Mellen Press, LewistonGoogle Scholar
  15. Guemple L (1988) Teaching social relations to Inuit children. In: Ingold T, Riches D, Woodburn J (eds) Hunters and gatherers 2: property, power and ideology. Berg, Oxford, pp 131–149Google Scholar
  16. Hewlett BS, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1986) Cultural transmission among Aka pygmies. Am Anthropol 88:922–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hewlett BS, Fouts HN, Boyette AH, Hewlett BL (2011) Social learning among Congo Basin hunter-gatherers. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 366:1168–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Honko L (1965) Memorates and the study of folk beliefs. J Folklore Inst 1:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howell S (1996) Nature in culture or culture in nature? Chewong ideas of ‘humans’ and other species. In: Descola P, Pălsson G (eds) Nature and society: anthropological perspectives. Routledge, London, pp 127–144Google Scholar
  20. Hviding E (1996) Nature, culture, magic, science: on meta-languages for comparison in cultural ecology. In: Descola P, Pălsson G (eds) Nature and society: anthropological perspectives. Routledge, London, pp 165–184Google Scholar
  21. Ingold T (1996) Hunting and gathering as ways of perceiving the environment. In: Ellen R, Fukui K (eds) Redefining nature: ecology, culture, and domestication. Berg, Oxford, pp 117–155Google Scholar
  22. Ingold T (1999) On the social relations of the hunter-gatherer band. In: Lee RB, Daly R (eds) The Cambridge encyclopedia of hunters and gatherers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 399–410Google Scholar
  23. Ingold T (2000) The perception of the environment: essays in livelihood, dwelling, and skill. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Konner M (1976) Maternal care, infant behavior, and development among the !Kung. In: Lee RB, DeVore I (eds) Kalahari hunter–gatherers: studies of the !Kung San and their neighbors. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 218–245Google Scholar
  25. Lévi-Strauss C (1966) The savage mind. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis J (2007) Ekila: blood, bodies, and egalitarian societies. J R Anthropol Inst 14:297–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liberman K (1985) Understanding interaction in central Australia: an ethnomethodological study of Australian aboriginal people. Routledge and Kegan Paul, BostonGoogle Scholar
  28. MacDonald K (2007) Cross-cultural comparison of learning in human hunting. Hum Nat 18:386–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Misra PK (1977) The Jenu Kurubas. In: Sinha S, Sharma BD (eds) Primitive tribes: the first step. Indian Ministry of Home Affairs, pp 103–31Google Scholar
  30. Morris B (1976) Whither the savage mind: notes on the natural taxonomies of a hunting and Gathering People. Man 11:542–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Myers FR (1988) Burning the truck and holding the country: property, time and the negotiation of identity among Pintupi aborigines. In: Ingold T, Riches D, Woodburn J (eds) Hunters and gatherers 2: property, power and ideology. Berg, Oxford, pp 52–74Google Scholar
  32. Naveh D (2007) Continuity and change in Nayaka epistemology and subsistence economy: a hunter-gatherer case from South India. Dissertation, University of HaifaGoogle Scholar
  33. Naveh D, Bird-David N (2013) On animisms, conservation, and immediacy. In: Harvey G (ed) A handbook on contemporary animism. Acumen Publishing, Durham, pp 27–37Google Scholar
  34. Naveh D, Bird-David N (2014) How persons become things: economic and epistemological changes among Nayaka hunter-gatherers. J R Anthropol Inst 20:74–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norström C (2003) “They call for us”: strategies for securing autonomy among the Paliyans, hunter-gatherers of the Palni Hills, South India. Stockholm University Press, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  36. Silberbauer GB (1981) Hunter and habitat in the central Kalahari desert. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Silberbauer GB (1982) Political process in G/Wi bands. In: Leacock E, Lee RB (eds) Politics and history in band societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 23–35Google Scholar
  38. Terashima H (2005) Knowledge about plant medicine and practice among the Ituri Forest foragers. In: Widlock T, Tadesse WG (eds) Property and equality: ritualisation, sharing, egalitarianism, vol 1. Berghahn Books, pp 47–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations