Three-Dimensional Distribution of Radiocesium in Sea Sediment Derived from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant
- 1 Citations
- 6.5k Downloads
Abstract
This section introduces results of an investigation for radiocesium (134Cs and 137Cs) in sea sediment. The three-dimensional spatial distributions of radiocesium in sea sediment to a 14-cm core depth were surveyed from off the northern part of Ibaraki Prefecture to off Fukushima Prefecture with 5-min horizontal resolution in July 2012, approximately 16 months after the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) accident. A high concentration band was observed along the 100-m isobaths where the concentration of the 137Cs reached 1,240 Bq/kg-dry at the maximum and where vertical profiles of the concentration generally had an exponential-type decline with depth. The concentrations were very low at the area shallower than 100 m of depth north from the FNPP, where vertical concentration peaks often occurred in deeper layers. These horizontal and vertical distribution patterns are suggested to be mainly determined by the supplied amount of radiocesium from the radiocesium-contaminated bottom seawater and the ability of radiocesium adsorption as dependent on the grain size of the sediment.
Keywords
Radiocesium Sea sediment Grain size Organic matter Bottom seawater4.1 Introduction
The Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) accident associated with the Great Earthquake and ensuing tsunami that occurred east of Japan on March 11, 2011 caused a serious discharge of anthropogenic radionuclides directly into the sea environment from that site. Although a large part of the FNPP-derived radiocesium (134Cs and 137Cs) released directly into the ocean, which was one of the main discharged radionuclides (TEPCO 2012), was transported and diffused to the open ocean by ocean currents (Buesseler et al. 2011; Aoyama et al. 2012; Tsumune et al. 2012; Kaeriyama et al. 2013, 2014), the radiocesium remained with relatively high concentration levels in sea sediment off East Japan (Kusakabe et al. 2013).
Location of survey for radiocesium concentration in sea sediment in July 2012. Sediments were sampled with a tube-type core sampler (squares) and a Smith–McIntyre grab sampler (triangles). Contour lines indicate water depth at an interval of 100 m. Cross indicates the location of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP). Dotted line indicates a caution zone that had been established during the survey period by the Japanese government
Photographs of collecting sea sediment by a tube-type core sampler
4.2 Horizontal Distribution of Radiocesium
Spatial distributions of 134Cs (a–f) and 137Cs (g–l) concentrations in sediment in July 2012. The respective nuclide and layer are indicated at the upper left side of each map. “X” mean that radiocesium was not detected (concentration was less than the lower limit of detection, which was from 0.63 to 3.0 Bq/kg-dry). Blank tiles mean data missing where no sample was collected. Contour lines indicate water depth at an interval of 100 m. Cross indicates the location of the FNPP
One point is that sediments with relatively high concentrations were distributed along and near the coast and and in 100-m isobaths. For example, concerning the 137Cs concentrations in the 0–1 cm sediment layer (Fig. 4.3g), where the geometric mean of the concentration value was 100 Bq/kg-dry in the whole area with a value range from 8.8 to 1,240 Bq/kg-dry, most of the concentrations higher than 150 Bq/kg-dry were distributed in these areas. It can be also seen that the high-concentration bands were divided into two in the northern part of Fukushima Prefecture, associated with the 100-m isobath that goes away from the coast there.
Another significant feature is that sediments with relatively low concentrations were found between the two high-concentration bands in the northern part of Fukushima Prefecture. The concentration value less than approximately 20 Bq/kg-dry was locally concentrated in this area. Furthermore, a narrow minimal concentration band of 30–60 Bq/kg-dry in the 0–1 cm sediment layer also seemed to exist near the 200-m isobaths in about 20–30 km east from the high-concentration band in the south of the FNPP. Because this low band did not quite range over plural grid points from east to west, the band width was probably less than 15 km (for instance, a longitudinal 5-min grid interval is approximately 7.4 km at 37°N). These results indicate that radiocesium concentration does not simply decrease toward offshore.
4.3 Vertical Distribution of Radiocesium
All obtained vertical profiles (gray lines with circles) of 137Cs concentration in July 2012. The box-and-whisker plot shows the minimum value, the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, and the maximum value, respectively, in each layer
Relative magnitude of 134Cs (a–f) and 137Cs (g–l) concentration compared with in the surface-most (0–1 cm) sediment at each location in July 2012. The respective layer is indicated at the side of each map
4.4 Grain-Size Distribution and Relationship with Radiocesium Concentrations in Sediment
Spatial distribution of median particle grain size of the surface-most sediment in July 2012
(a) Comparison between 137Cs concentration and median grain size in the most-surface sediment. The symbols for the scatter plot show the clusters segmented into five types by the group average method; the corresponding locations of those types are projected in (b)
Histograms of relative magnitude of 137Cs concentration in each diameter class of the surface-most sediment compared with the concentration in bulk sediment. Diameter classes are indicated at upper right
Ambe et al. (2014) also indicated that the quantity of radiocesium supplied to the sea bottom from seawater is another factor to determine the distribution of the radiocesium concentration in sea sediment. The concentrations ranged over more than one order of magnitude in each similar grain-size class, but the samples could be divided into five clusters (symbols in Fig. 4.7a) by cluster analysis based on the group average method (Romesburg 2004), using the distance on the coordinate between the median grain size and 137Cs concentration. Accordingly, three types of clusters by geographic dependence were detected (Fig. 4.7b): (1) large grain sizes and low radiocesium concentrations, distributed at depths shallower than 100 m in the region north from the FNPP (indicated by filled triangles in the figure); (2) small grain sizes with high radiocesium concentrations, distributed mainly at depths shallower than 100 m, excepting the area of cluster (1) (indicated by filled squares); and (3) small grain sizes with low radiocesium concentrations, mainly in the area deeper than 100 m (filled circles). The division of cluster (1) from others can be attributed mainly to the low adsorption capability of large-grain-size sediment for cesium, as already mentioned. On the other hand, the radiocesium concentration in bottom seawater could be more than twice or one order higher in the area shallower than 100 m than in the area at 100–300 m depth by monitoring data (Oikawa et al. 2013) and numerical study (Bailly du Bois et al. 2014), for division between the clusters (2) and (3).
4.5 Organic Matter Content and Relationship with Radiocesium Concentration in Sediment
(a) Spatial distribution of organic matter content of the surface-most sediment in July 2012. (b) Comparison between 137Cs concentration and organic matter content in the surface sediment. Symbols correspond to the result of cluster analysis in Fig. 4.7a
Notes
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Fisheries Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan.
References
- Ambe D, Kaeriyama H, Shigenobu Y, Fujimoto K, Ono T, Sawada H, Saito H, Miki S, Setou T, Morita T, Watanabe T (2014) Five-minute resolved spatial distribution of radiocesium in sea sediment derived from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant. J Environ Radioact 138:264–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.09.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Aoyama M, Tsumune D, Uematsu M, Kondo F, Hamajima Y (2012) Temporal variation of 134Cs and 137Cs activities in surface water at stations along the coastline near the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident site, Japan. Geochem J 46(4):321–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bailly du Bois P, Garreau P, Laguionie P, Korsakissok I (2014) Comparison between modelling and measurement of marine dispersion, environmental half-time and 137Cs inventories after the Fukushima Daiichi accident. Ocean Dyn 64(3):361–383. doi: 10.1007/s10236-013-0682-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Børrentzen P, Salbu B (2012) Fixation of Cs to marine sediments estimated by a stochastic modeling approach. J Environ Radioact 61:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Buesseler K, Aoyama M, Fukasawa M (2011) Impacts of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants on marine radioactivity. Environ Sci Technol 45:9931–9935PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Comans RNJ, Hockley D (1992) Kinetics of cesium sorption on illite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 56:1157–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Comans RNJ, Haller M, DePreter P (1991) Sorption of cesium on illite: non-equilibrium behavior and reversibility. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kaeriyama H, Ambe D, Shimizu Y, Fujimoto K, Ono T, Yonezaki S, Kato Y, Matsunaga H, Minami H, Nakatsuka S, Watanabe T (2013) Direct observation of 134Cs and 137Cs in the western and central North Pacific after the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Biogeosciences 10:4287–7295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kaeriyama H, Shimizu Y, Ambe D, Masujima M, Shigenobu Y, Fujimoto K, Ono T, Nishiuchi K, Taneda T, Kurogi H, Setou T, Sugisaki H, Ichikawa T, Hidaka K, Hiroe Y, Kusaka A, Kodama T, Kuriyama M, Morita H, Nakata K, Morinaga K, Morita T, Watanabe T (2014) Southwest intrusion of 134Cs and 137Cs derived from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in the western North Pacific. Environ Sci Technol 48:3120–3127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kusakabe M, Oikawa S, Takata H, Misonoo J (2013) Spatiotemporal distributions of Fukushima-derived radionuclides in nearby marine surface sediments. Biogeosciences 10:5019–5030. doi: 10.5194/bg-10-5019-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oikawa S, Takata H, Watabe T, Misonoo J, Kusakabe M (2013) Distribution of the Fukushima-derived radionuclides in seawater in the Pacific off the coast of Miyagi, Fukushima, and Ibaraki prefectures, Japan. Biogeosciences 10:5031–5047. doi: 10.5194/bgd-10-4851-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Otosaka S, Kobayashi T (2013) Sedimentation and remobilization of radiocesium in the coastal area of Ibaraki, 70 km south of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant. Environ Monit Assess 185:5419–5433. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2956-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Romesburg HC (2004) Cluster analysis for researchers. Lulu Press, MorrisvilleGoogle Scholar
- Sakuma H, Kawamura K (2011) Structure and dynamics of water on Li+-, Na+-, K+-, Cs+-, H3O+-exchanged muscovite surfaces: a molecular dynamics study. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shepherd RG (1989) Correlations of permeability and grain size. Ground Water 27:633–638. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1989.tb00476.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Co.) (2012) TEPCO news press releases. http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/2012/1204659_1870.html
- Tsumune D, Tsubono T, Aoyama M, Hirose K (2012) Distribution of oceanic 137Cs from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant simulated numerically by a regional ocean model. J Environ Radioact 111:100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.10.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wada T, Nemoto Y, Shimamura S, Fujita T, Mizuno T, Sohtome T, Kamiyama K, Morita T, Igarashi S (2013) Effects of the nuclear disaster on marine products in Fukushima. J Environ Radioact 124:246–254. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.05.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.










