Advertisement

Digital Geography Education in the Twenty-First Century: Needs and Opportunities

  • Joop van der ScheeEmail author
  • Henk Trimp
  • Tine Béneker
  • Tim Favier
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences book series (AGES)

Abstract

The introduction of geospatial technologies is changing geography education very fast. Google Earth, web atlases and many location based services are available from the Internet and offer the opportunity to study almost every place in the world anytime anywhere. This opens up a great perspective for geography education in a way not known before. Nevertheless also in geography life is not just a bed of roses. The introduction of geospatial technologies is not always simple, due to technical problems and fast changing devices, a lack of experience in teaching with geospatial technologies and a huge amount of information that may prevent learners to see the wood for the trees. However, the advantages of using geospatial technologies in geography education far outweigh the problems if geographical thinking is involved. This contribution discusses briefly the needs and opportunities of digital geography education in the twenty-first century.

Keywords

Geography education Geospatial technologies Geospatial thinking 

References

  1. Baker, T., Battersby, S., Bednarz, S., Bodzin, A. M., Kolvoord, B., Moore, S., Sinton, D., & Uttal, D. (2014). A research agenda for geospatial technologies and learning. Journal of Geography (online), 1–13.Google Scholar
  2. Bednarz, S. W., & Van der Schee, J. A. (2006). Europe and the United States: The implementation of geographical information systems in secondary education in two contexts. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15(2), 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borian, G. (2012). GIS in natural science teacher training. In A. Milson, A. Demirci, & J. Kerski (Eds.), International perspectives on teaching and learning with GIS in secondary schools (pp. 125–130). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borruso, G. (2013). Web 2.0 and neogeography. Opportunities for teaching geography. Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography (J-Reading), 2(2), 43–55.Google Scholar
  5. Burrough, P. A. (1986). Principles of geographic information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  6. Butt, G. (2011). Introduction. In G. Butt (Ed.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 1–11). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Cimons, M. (2011). Geospatial technology as a core tool. US News provided by National Science Foundation. Downloaded June 25, 2014, from www.usnews.com/science/articles/2011/05/11/geospatial-technology-as-a-core-tool
  8. Dorling, D. (2012). Mapping change and changing mapping. Teaching Geography, 37(2), 94–98.Google Scholar
  9. Fargher, M. (2013). Geographic Information (GI) – How could it be used? In D. Lambert & M. Jones (Eds.), Debates in geography education (pp. 206–218). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Favier, T., & Van der Schee, J. A. (2014). The effects of geography lessons with geospatial technologies on the development of high school students’ relational thinking. Computers & Education, 76, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geographical Association. (2009). Geography: A different view. Sheffield: Geographical Association.Google Scholar
  12. Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haubrich, H. (1992). International Charter on Geographical Education. Freiburg: Commission on Geographical Education, IGU (see also www.igu-cge.org).
  14. Jo, I., & Bednarz, S. W. (2009). Evaluating geography textbook questions from a spatial perspective: Using concepts of space, tools of representation, and cognitive processes to evaluate spatiality. Journal of Geography, 108(1), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kerski, J. J. (2013). Understanding our changing world through web-mapping based investigations. Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography (J-Reading), 2(2), 11–26.Google Scholar
  16. Lambert, D., & Morgan, J. (2010). Teaching geography 11–18. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morgan, J. (2013). What do we mean by thinking geographically? In D. Lambert & M. Jones (Eds.), Debates in geography education (pp. 273–281). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Sinton, D. S., & Bednarz, S.W. (2007). About that G in GIS. In D. S. Sinton & J. Lund (Eds.), Understanding place GIS and mapping across the curriculum. Redlands: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  20. Taylor, L. (2008). Key concepts and medium term planning. Teaching Geography, 33(2), 50–54.Google Scholar
  21. Uhlenwinkel, A. (2013). Spatial thinking or thinking geographically? On the importance of avoiding maps without meaning. In T. Jekel et al. (Eds.), GI_Forum 2013. Creating the GISociety (pp. 294–305). Berlin: Wichmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joop van der Schee
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Henk Trimp
    • 3
  • Tine Béneker
    • 1
    • 4
  • Tim Favier
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of GeosciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty of Earth and Life SciencesVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.AnaximanderAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Geography DepartmentFontys University of Applied SciencesTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations