Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions pp 133-150 | Cite as
Transition Management in Montreuil: Towards Perspectives of Hybridisation Between ‘Top-Down’ and ‘Bottom-Up’ Transitions
Abstract
The French government addressed the question of sustainability transitions by organizing a national debate on energy transition at the end of 2012, driven by the Ministry of Ecology. The transition motif has also been taken up by local and grassroots actors and initiatives trying to converge in a cohesive society project. These two strands of transitions, one institutional, directed in a ‘top-down’ manner, and another, a grassroots or ‘bottom-up’ sort, question the potential for a dialogue to emerge between these two dynamics and their respective actors.
This chapter draws on the case of Montreuil, the fourth most populous suburb of Paris, involved in a transition management process from 2011 to 2014 as part of the elaboration of its Local Climate Plan. Based on a 2-years’ participant observation within the project team, the aim is to describe the adaptation of transition management to the French political context and to explore the possibility of ‘hybridisations’ between ‘regime’ and ‘niche’ actors—between their roles, relations, and cultures.
Keywords
Transition Sustainability Transition management Hybridisation Montreuil Reflexive governance Civil servants EmpowermentReferences
- Argyris C, Schön DA (1974) Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Arnstein S (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35(4):216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ATTAC (2013) Petit manuel de la transition: pour toutes celles et ceux qui aimeraient mais doutent qu’un autre monde soit possible. les Liens qui libèrent, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Avelino F (2011) Power in transitions. Empowering discourses on sustainability transitions. PhD dissertation. Rotterdam UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Avelino F, Rotmans J (2009) Power in transition: an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. Eur J Soc Theory 12:543–569. doi: 10.1177/1368431009349830 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boulanger PM (2008) Une gouvernance du changement sociétal: le transition management. Rev Nouv 11:61–73Google Scholar
- Chateauraynaud F (2013) La radicalité est-elle soluble dans l’argumentation ? La sociologie des controverses et l’endogénéisation de la critique sociale. Paper presented at the doctoral seminar Fructis Arc, Liege University, 17 Apr 2013Google Scholar
- Demoulin J, Tribout S (2014) Construire des espaces de réflexivité pour analyser et transformer les pratiques professionnelles: un travail de légitimation, ¿Interrogations? 19Google Scholar
- Frémeaux P, Lalucq A, Kalinowski W (2013) Transition écologique, mode d’emploi. Les Petits Matins, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Gorz A (2008) Écologica. Galilée, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Grandjean A, Le Teno H, Hulot N (2014) Miser (vraiment) sur la transition écologique. Les Ed. de l’Atelier, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J et al (2010) Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hendriks CM, Grin J (2007) Contextualizing reflexive governance: the politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. J Environ Policy Amp Plan 9:333–350. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622790 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hopwood B, Mellor M, O’Brien G (2005) Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain Dev 13:38–52. doi: 10.1002/sd.244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kemp R, Loorbach D (2006) Transition management: a reflexive governance approach. In: Voss JP, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (eds) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- Laclau E, Mouffe C (2001) Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. Royaume-Uni, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Meadowcroft J (2011) Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environ Innov Soc Transit 1:70–75. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nez H (2012) Nature et légitimités des savoirs citoyens dans l’urbanisme participatif. Une enquête ethnographique à Paris. Sociologie 2:387–404. doi:10.3917/socio.024.0387Google Scholar
- Paredis E (2013) A winding road. Transition management, policy change and the search for sustainable development. PhD dissertation. Universiteit GentGoogle Scholar
- Robinson J (2004) Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecol Econ 48:369–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rumpala Y (2013) Sur les possiblités d’une transition écologique “par le bas”: vers une théorie post-gouvernementale. Paper presented at the workshop “Développement durable et ‘acceptabilité sociale’”. Paris Val de Seine Architecture School, 15 Feb 2013Google Scholar
- Schäpke N, Omann I, Mock MM et al (2013) Supporting sustainability transitions by enhancing the human dimension via empowerment, social learning and social capital. Proceedings of the SCORAI Europe workshops, Rotterdam, 7–8 Oct 2013Google Scholar
- Seyfang G, Smith A (2007) Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ Polit 16:584–603. doi: 10.1080/09644010701419121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sintomer Y, Blondiaux L (2002) L’impératif délibératif. Politix 15:17–35. doi: 10.3406/polix.2002.1205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Soulé B (2007) Observation participante ou participation observante ? Usages et justifications de la notion de participation observante en sciences sociales. Rech Qual 27:127–140Google Scholar