Advertisement

Evolution of Organizational Capabilities in Manufacturing: The Case of the Toyota Motor Corporation

  • Takahiro FujimotoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science book series (EESCS, volume 12)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the formation and evolution of organizational capabilities in manufacturing at the individual firm level. Empirically, we look at the emergence of the manufacturing system at the Toyota Motor Corporation, the Toyota Production System, between the 1930s and the 1990s.

We propose to link the resource-capability view of the firm with the evolutionary framework in social sciences or a dynamic perspective that can separately explain an observed system’s survival (i.e., functional logic) and its formation (i.e., genetic logic). Within this evolutionary framework, two main concepts are proposed: multipath system emergence, for analyzing the complex variations in manufacturing system changes, and evolutionary learning capability, for explaining why certain firms can develop competitive manufacturing capabilities faster than their competitors.

We apply these concepts to a historical analysis of the manufacturing system at Toyota. More specifically, we investigate the origins of several major organizational routines of the Toyota Production System and show that they emerged through the unpredictable patterns of various evolutionary paths, including rational calculation, random trials, environmental constraints, entrepreneurial visions, and knowledge transfer, i.e., through multipath system emergence.

It follows from this that Toyota, as a consistently competitive manufacturing firm, possesses not only (1) routinized (static) manufacturing capability and (2) routinized learning (continuous improvement) capability but also (3) evolutionary learning capability, which is a firm’s dynamic capability-building capability to improve productive performance in the long run in a situation of multipath system emergence. In other words, a firm’s evolutionary capability, or the capability of building capabilities despite a situation of unpredictable multipath system emergence, is critical to its long-term survival and growth, particularly in industries where competition is intense, market/technology environments are uncertain, and products/processes are complex.

References

  1. Abernathy WJ (1978) The productivity dilemma. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  2. Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Technol Rev 80(7):2–9Google Scholar
  3. Alchian AA (1950) Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. J Polit Econ 53(3):211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyris C, Schön DA (1996) Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett WP, Burgelman RA (1996) Evolutionary perspectives on strategy. Strateg Manag J 17:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: expectation, luck and business strategy. Manag Sci 32:1231–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgelman RA (1994) Fading memories: a process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Adm Sci Q 39:24–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll GR et al (1996) The fates of De Novo and De Alio producers in the American automobile industry 1885–1981. Strateg Manag J 17:117–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandler AD (1990) Scale and scope. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Chandler AD (1992) What is a firm? Eur Econ Rev 36:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark KB, Fujimoto T (1989) Lead time in automobile product development: explaining the Japanese advantage. J Technol Eng Manag 6:25–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark KB, Fujimoto T (1991) Product development performance. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Adaptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1994) Fortune favors the prepared firm. Manag Sci 40(2):227–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cusumano MA (1985) The Japanese automobile industry. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res Policy 11:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiol CM, Lyles MA (1985) Organizational learning. Acad Manag Rev 10(4):803–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fujimoto T (1989) Organizations for effective product development – the case of the global automobile industry. Unpublished D.B.A. Dissertation, Harvard Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  19. Fujimoto T (1999) The evolution of a manufacturing system at Toyota. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant R (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif Manag Rev 33(3):114–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall N (ed) (1991) Exploring Chaos: a guide to the new science of disorder. W. W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational ecology. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayes RH, Wheelwright SC (1984) Restoring our competitive edge. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayes RH et al (1988) Dynamic manufacturing. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirshleifer J (1977) Economics from a biological viewpoint. J Law Econ 20(1):1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hounshell DA (1984) From the American system to mass production 1800–1932: the development of manufacturing technology in the US. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  28. Iansiti M, Clark KB (1993) Integration and dynamic capability: evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Harvard Business School working paper 93-047Google Scholar
  29. Itami H (1984) Shin Keieisenryaku no Ronri (the logic of business strategy: revised). Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  30. Kogut B, Kulatilaka N (1992) What is a critical capability. Paper presented at the Joseph A. Schumpeter Society, Kyoto, August 1992Google Scholar
  31. Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg Manag J 13:111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu Rev Sociol 14:319–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. March JG (1988) Decisions and organizations. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. March JG, Olsen JP (1976) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations Universitetsforlaget, BergenGoogle Scholar
  35. March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Merton R (1968) Social theory and social structure. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Mintzberg H (1987) Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review July–August 1987, pp 66–75Google Scholar
  38. Mintzberg H, Waters JA (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strateg Manag J 6(3):257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Nonaka I (1985) Kigyo Shinkaron (the theory of corporate evolution). Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  41. Parsons T (1937) The structure of social action. Free Press, GlencoeGoogle Scholar
  42. Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harv Bus Rev 68(3):79–91Google Scholar
  44. Quinn JB (1978) Strategic change: ‘Logical Incrementalism’. Sloan Manag Rev 1(20):7–21Google Scholar
  45. Rumelt RP (1984) Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In: Lamb RB (ed) Competitive strategic management. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood CliffGoogle Scholar
  46. Rumelt RP (1991) How much does industry matter? Strateg Manag J 12:167–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simon HA (1969) The science of the artificial. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Simon HA (1976) Administrative behavior. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Teece DJ, Pisano G (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Ind Corp Chang 3(3):537–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teece DJ et al (1992) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Revised, June 1992. Working Paper, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  51. Teece DJ et al (1994) Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. J Econ Behav Organ 23:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory: foundations, development, applications. George Braziller, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. von Hippel E, Tyre M (1993) How ‘Learning by doing’ is done: problem identification in novel process equipment. M.I.T. Sloan School Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  54. Weick K (1979) The social psychology of organizing. Addison Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  55. Weinberg GM (1975) An introduction to general systems thinking. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Womack J et al (1990) The machine that changed the world. Rawson Associates, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EconomicsThe University of TokyoBunkyo-KuJapan

Personalised recommendations