When Is Too Much Money Worse Than Too Little? Giving, Aid, and Impact After the Indian Ocean Tsunami of 2004

Chapter
Part of the Disaster Risk Reduction book series (DRR)

Abstract

This chapter examines the problematic of donations and humanitarian aid, a context already fraught with power imbalance, when donors give so much that it is arguably more than what is needed. Although similar situations have occurred over the past decade, the devastating Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004 was one of the first examples of this in modern aid work, inspiring a response from donors that was both quantitatively and qualitatively unprecedented. Both the size of the response and the structural differences because of the large percentage of non-institutional donors led to a number of problems that highlight issues in the aid paradigm. The large amount of funding did not lead to improved performance; rather, it raised expectations to an unrealistic level and led to a focus on media-friendly projects rather than need-based programming. Despite the surplus in funding, agencies continued to compete, either for grants or for beneficiaries, which became in shorter supply than money; and this competition, rather than improving performance, tended to worsen it.

Keywords

Aid Disaster Donors Funding Tsunami 

References

  1. Barnett M (2005) Humanitarianism transformed. Perspect Polit 3(4):723–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett J, Bertrand W, Harkin C, Samarasinghe S, Wickramatillake H (2006) Coordination of international humanitarian assistance in tsunami-affected countries. Tsunami Evaluation Coalition, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooley A, Ron J (2002) The NGO scramble. Int Secur 27(1):5–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cosgrave J (2007) Synthesis report: expanded summary. Joint evaluation of the international response to the Indian Ocean tsunami. Tsunami Evaluation Coalition, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Daly P, Brassard C (2011) Aid accountability and participatory approaches in post-disaster housing reconstruction. Asian J Soc Sci 39:508–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dufour C, Geoffroy V, Maury H, Grünewald F (2004) Rights, standards and quality in a complex humanitarian space: is sphere the right tool? Disasters 28(2):124–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernando U, Hilhorst D (2006) Everyday practices of humanitarian aid: tsunami response in Sri Lanka. Dev Pract 16(03–04):292–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flint M, Goyder H (2006) Funding the tsunami response. Tsunami Evaluation Coalition, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Henderson JV, Lee YS (2011) Organization of disaster aid delivery: spending your donations. NBER Working Paper No. 17707. http://www.nber.org/papers/w17707
  10. Holguín-Veras J, Jaller M, Van Wassenhove LN, Pérez N, Wachtendorf T (2012a) On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. J Oper Manag 30:494–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holguín-Veras J, Taniguchi E, Ferreira F, Jaller M, Aros-Vera F, Thompson RG (2012b) The Tohoku disasters: chief lessons concerning the post-disaster humanitarian logistics response and policy implications. Provided by the first author via email. http://docs.trb.org/prp/12-1162.pdf
  12. Kessler E (Asian Disaster Preparedness Center) (2006) Local response: overview. The international community’s funding of the tsunami emergency and relief. Tsunami Evaluation Coalition (TEC), LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Korf B (2006) Commentary on the special section on the Indian Ocean tsunami: disasters, generosity and the other. Geogr J 172(3):245–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Redfield P (2008) Sacrifice, triage, and global humanitarianism. In: Barnett M, Weiss TG (eds) Humanitarianism in question: politics, power, ethics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/London, pp 196–214Google Scholar
  15. Stein JG (2008) Humanitarian organizations: accountable—why, to whom, for what, and how? In: Barnett M, Weiss TG (eds) Humanitarianism in question: politics, power, ethics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/London, pp 124–142Google Scholar
  16. Stirrat J (2006) Competitive humanitarianism: relief and the tsunami in Sri Lanka. Anthropol Today 22(5):11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Telford J, Cosgrave J, Houghton R (2006) Joint evaluation of the international response to the Indian Ocean tsunami: synthesis report. Tsunami Evaluation Coalition, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre de Sociologie des Organisations, Institut d’Études Politiques (Sciences Po)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations