An Overview of the Results and Insights from the Third Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC2012)
- 815 Downloads
The third Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC 2012) was held at the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2012, Valencia, Spain). ANAC is an international competition that aims to encourage research into bilateral, multi-issue negotiation, by providing a platform in which strategies developed independently by different research teams can be tried and compared against each other, in a real-time competition. In the 2012 edition, we received 17 entries from 9 different universities worldwide, out of which 8 were selected for the final round. This chapter aims to provide a broad description of the competition set-up (especially highlighting the changes from previous editions), the preference domains and the strategies submitted, as well as the results from both the qualifying and final rounds.
KeywordsAI competitions Automated negotiation Multi-agent systems
The authors acknowledge the use of the IRIDIS High Performance Computing Facility, and associated support services at the University of Southampton, in the completion of this work.
- 3.Fujita, K., Ito, T., Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.M., Kraus, S., Lin, R.: The second automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC 2011). Complex Automated Negotiations: Theories, Models, and Software Competitions; Series of Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 435, pp. 183–197 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.M., Kraus, S., Lin, R., Tykhonov, D.: GENIUS: negotiation environment for heterogeneous agents. In: Proc. 8th Int. Joint Conf. on Aut. Agents and Multi-Agent Syst. (AAMAS’09), vol. 2, pp. 1397–1398 (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.Marsa-Maestre, I., Lopez-Carmona, M.A., Velasco, J.R., Ito, T., Klein, M., Fujita, K.: Balancing utility and deal probability for auction-based negotiations in highly nonlinear utility spaces. In: Proc. of 21st Int. Joint Conf. on AI (IJCAI’09), pp. 214–219 (2009)Google Scholar
- 7.Robu, V., Somefun, D.J.A., Poutré, J.A.L.: Modeling complex multi-issue negotiations using utility graphs. In: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Aut. Agents and Multi-Agent Syst. (AAMAS’05), pp. 280–287 (2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Student: The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 6, 1–25 (1908)Google Scholar
- 10.Williams, C.R., Robu, V., Gerding, E.H., Jennings, N.R.: Using gaussian processes to optimise concession in complex negotiations against unknown opponents. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’11) vol. 1, pp. 432–438 (2011)Google Scholar
- 11.Williams, C.R., Robu, V., Gerding, E.H., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiating concurrently with unknown opponents in complex, real-time domains. In: Proc. of 20th European Conf. on AI (ECAI’12), pp. 834–839. IOS Press (2012)Google Scholar