Advertisement

Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation of Posterior Medial Branch of Cervical Spinal Nerve

  • Makoto FukusakiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the cervical posterior medial branch is used for reducing chronic neck-shoulder pain and nape-back pain which derived from facet joints due to cervical spondylosis for a long period. The patients lie prone or supine according to the upper or the lower medial branch neurotomy. When the insulation needle is contacted in the target deep branches around the hollow of joint column under C-arm fluoroscopy, the radiating pain is obtained. The contraction of paravertebral muscle at 5 Hz and the radiating pain at 50 Hz could be verified. The best needle position in thermocoagulation is the point which the radiating pain is gotten by electrical stimulation with pulse width of 1 ms and low voltage of less than 0.5 V. Without the complications after radiograph with contrast medium and a 0.5 mL of 2% mepivacaine, the radiofrequency is performed by thermocoagulation at 60–90 °C for 90 s. The complications include temporary skin hypoesthesia, dorsal muscle power weakness, pain enhancement, and residual pain. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation of cervical posterior medial branch for chronic neck-shoulder pain is performed by neurolysis at 60-90 °C for 90-seconds on the target deep branches around the hollow of joint column under fluoroscopy.

Keywords

Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Cervical posterior medial branch Chronic neck-shoulder pain 

References

  1. 1.
    Manchikanti L, Singh V, Rivera J, Pampati V. Prevalence of cervical facet joint pain in chronic neck pain. Pain Physician. 2002;5:242–9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lord SM, Bamsley L, Wallis BJ, McDonald GJ, Bogduk N. Percutaneous radio-frequency neurotomy for chronic cervical zygapophyseal joint pain. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1721–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Falco FJ, Manchikanti L, Datta S, Wargo BW, Geffert S, Bryce DA, Atluri S, Singh V, Benyamin RM, Sehgal N, Ward SP, Helm S 2nd, Gupta S, Boswell MV. Systematic review of the therapeutic effectiveness of cervical facet joint interventions: an update. Pain Physician. 2012;15(6):E839–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ohseto K. 11 Keitsui sekizuishinnkei koushinaisokushi kousyuhanetsugyoukohou. In: Ohseto K, editor. Toushika shinnkeiburokkuhou. Tokyo: Igakushoin; 2009. p. 44–6. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dwyer A, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Cervical zygapophyseal joint pain patterns. I: a study in normal volunteers. Spine. 1990;15:453–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fukui S, Ohseto K, Shiotani M, Yuda Y, Wakasugi B. Referred pain distribution of cervical zygapophyseal joints and cervical dorsal rami. Pain. 1996;68:79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gauci CA. Manual of RF techniques 2nd edition a practical manual of radiofrequency procedures in chronic pain management. Amsterdam: Flivo Press; 2008. Chapters 38–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nagasaki Rosai HospitalSaseboJapan

Personalised recommendations