Social Conflict Management in Primates: Is There a Case For Dolphins?

  • Marina Cords
  • Janet Mann
Part of the Primatology Monographs book series (PrimMono)


Gregarious animals face unavoidable conflicts of interest and thus therefore are likely to evolve behavioral mechanisms that allow them to manage conflict and thus maintain their social bonds. Multiple forms of conflict management characterize primates, but far less research has focused on dolphins, especially under natural conditions. Captive studies of dolphins have confirmed post-conflict reconciliation, a well-studied form of conflict management in primates. The fission–fusion nature of dolphin social systems, along with the vast home ranges of individuals, pose particular difficulties for the study of conflict management. Conflicts among male allies are likely to be a fruitful area for further research on conflict management, both because allies are valuable social partners and because they interact frequently over extended periods.


Aggression Alliance Conflict Conflict management Reconciliation Social organization 


  1. Arnold K, Fraser ON, Aureli F (2010) Postconflict reconciliation. In: Campbell CJ, Fuentes A, MacKinnon KC, Bearder SK, Stumpf R (eds) Primates in perspective, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 608–625Google Scholar
  2. Aureli F, de Waal F (2000) Natural conflict resolution. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  3. Aureli F, Cords M, van Schaik CP (2002) Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive framework. Anim Behav 64:325–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baird RW, Dill LM (1996) Ecological and social determinants of group size in transient killer whales. Behav Ecol 7:408–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connor RC, Richards AF, Smolker RA, Mann J (1996) Patterns of female attractiveness in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. Behaviour 133:37–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connor RC, Wells R, Mann J, Read A (2000) The bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops sp.: social relationships in a fission–fusion society. In: Mann J, Connor R, Tyack P, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 91–126Google Scholar
  7. Cords M, Aureli F (2000) Reconciliation and relationship qualities. In: Aureli F, de Waal F (eds) Natural conflict resolution. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 177–198Google Scholar
  8. Cords M, Killen M (1998) Conflict resolution in human and non-human primates. In: Langer J, Killen M (eds) Piaget, evolution, and development. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 193–217Google Scholar
  9. Ford JKB, Ellis GM (2006) Selective foraging by fish-eating killer whales Orcinus orca in British Columbia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 316:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holobinko A, Waring GH (2010) Conflict and reconciliation behavior trends of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Zoo Biol 29:567–585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. MacLeod CD (1998) Intraspecific scarring in odontocete cetaceans: an indicator of male ‘quality’ in aggressive social interactions? J Zool 244:71–77Google Scholar
  12. Mann J, Sargeant BL, Minor M (2007) Calf inspection of fish catches: opportunities for oblique social learning? Mar Mamm Sci 23:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Owen ECG, Wells RS, Hofmann S (2002) Ranging and association patterns of paired and unpaired adult male Atlantic bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in Sarasota, Florida, provide no evidence for alternative male strategies. Can J Zool 80:2072–2089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scott E, Mann J, Watson-Capps JJ, Sargeant BL, Connor RC (2005) Aggression in bottlenose dolphins: evidence for sexual coercion, male–male competition, and female tolerance through analysis of tooth-rake marks and behaviour. Behaviour 142:21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tamaki N, Morisaka T, Michihiro T (2006) Does body contact contribute towards repairing relationships? The association between flipper-rubbing and aggressive behavior in captive bottlenose dolphins. Behav Processes 37:209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wahaj SA, Guse KR, Holekamp KE (2001) Reconciliation in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta). Ethology 107:1057–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Watts DP (2006) Conflict resolution in chimpanzees and the valuable-relationships hypothesis. Int J Primatol 27:1337–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weaver A (2003) Conflict and reconciliation in captive bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. Mar Mamm Sci 19:836–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wittig RM, Boesch C (2003) The choice of post-conflict interactions in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behaviour 140:1527–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental BiologyColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Biology and PsychologyGeorgetown UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations