Advertisement

The Significance of Natural Computing for Considering Computational Aesthetics of Nature

  • Fuminori Akiba
Open Access
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings in Information and Communications Technology book series (PICT, volume 6)

Abstract

In this paper, I aim to propose computational aesthetics of nature and to explain how the idea of “harness” in natural computing is centrally important to this end. First, I reconfirm the original scope of Kant’s aesthetics that is at the core of computational aesthetics. In the discussion of Kant’s aesthetics, I contend that the reason Kant introduced the concepts of beauty in nature and aesthetic judgment into his philosophy is because he recognized them as key drivers behind the development and cultivation of our understanding of nature. I point out that the field of computational aesthetics presently understands Kant’s aesthetics only insufficiently. There thus exists a need to propose another computational aesthetics of nature and to define its central aim: to find the beautiful in nature, leading us both to a better understanding of nature, and to a greater awareness of how we should live in nature. With this aim in mind, “harness” emerges as a useful tool for computational aesthetics of nature—one that merits consideration.

Keywords

aesthetics computation nature Kant harness indirect interaction tactile score 

References

  1. Akiba, F.: Information and Expression. Selected Papers of the 15th International Congress of Aesthetics, Makuhari, pp. 3–6 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. Bertelsen: Aesthetics as Means for Supporting Development in Use - Beyond the Designed Purposefulness. In: Bertelsen, O., Fishwick, P. (eds.) Aesthetic Computing, Dagstuhl Seminar Report No. 348, http://www.dagstuhl.de/Reports/02/02291.pdf
  3. Hoenig, F.: Defining Computational Aesthetics. In: Neumann, L., Sibert, M., Gooch, B., Purgathofer, W. (eds.) Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging, Eurographics Digital Library (2005), diglib.eg.org
  4. Kant, I.: Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790); trans. Guyer, P., Matthews, E.: Cambridge University Press (2001)Google Scholar
  5. Scha, R., Bod, R.: Computational Esthetics. In: Informatie en Informatiebeleid 11(1), pp. 54–63 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. Suzuki, Y.: Self-Organization is Computation. In: Handbook of Self-Organization, S.T.N. (2009) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. Suzuki, Y., Watanabe, J., Suzuki, R.: Tactile Score, a Knowledge Media of Tactile Sense for Creativity. In: Watanabe, T., Watada, J., Takahashi, N., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Intelligent Interactive Multimedia: Systems & Services. SIST, vol. 14, pp. 579–587. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Watanabe, J.: An Interpretation of New Media Experiences Motivated by the Viewpoint of Computational Aesthetics. In: Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Natural Computing (JSAI 2011) (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fuminori Akiba
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Information ScienceNagoya UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations