The Future of Self-Organizing Robots

  • Satoshi MurataEmail author
  • Haruhisa Kurokawa
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 77)


In the chapters so far, we have discussed in detail the design of mechanical systems and robots based on self-organization, from their historical development to specific design examples. The authors hope that these chapters enable the reader to understand that these are fundamentally multiple-module systems that have flexibility that cannot be expected of traditional mechanical systems. In this chapter, we discuss the limitations and future challenges facing self-organizing robots built with electro-mechanical technologies, and then, returning to the philosophy of “design based on self-organization” one last time, consider the goals we should set for self-organizing robots from a relatively long term perspective. One such goal is to make molecular machines that self-organize.


Logic Gate Molecular Machine Molecular Robot Molecular Robotic Ultimate Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    White, P.J., et al.: Stochastic Self-Reconfigurable Cellular Robotics. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., vol. 3, pp. 2888–2893 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Feynman, R.P.: There’s plenty of room at the bottom. IEEE J. Microelectromechanical Syst. 1, 60–66 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drexler, K.E.: Engines of Creation, The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. Anchor Books, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, J., et al. (eds.): Nanotechnology: Science and Computation. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Komiya, K., et al.: DNA Nanoengineering, Kindaikagakusha, Tokyo (2011) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Winfree, E., et al.: Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals. Nat. 394, 539–544 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rothemund, P.W.K., et al.: Algorithmic Self-Assembly of DNA Sierpinski Triangles. PLOS Biology (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fujibayashi, K., et al.: Toward Reliable Algorithmic Self-Assembly of DNA Tiles; A Fixed-Width Cellular Automaton Pattern. NanoLetters 8(7), 1791–1797 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rothemund, P.W.K.: Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nat. 440, 297–302 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shih, W.M., et al.: A 1.7-kilobase single-stranded DNA that folds into a nanoscale octahedron. Nat. 427, 618–621 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stojanovic, M., Stefanovic, D.: A deoxyribozime-based molecular automaton. Nat. Biotechnology 21(9), 1069–1074 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pei, R., et al.: Training a molecular automaton to play a game. Nature Nanotechnol. 5, 773–777Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ellington, A.D., Szostak, J.W.: In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nat. 346(6287), 818–822 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yurke, B., et al.: A DNA-fuelled molecular machine made of DNA. Nat. 406, 605–608 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Haruhisa Kurokawa, Satoshi Murata 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Bioengineering and Robotic Graduate School of EngineeringTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.Intelligent Systems Institute Field Robotics Research GroupNational Institute of Advanced Science and Technology (AIST)TsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations