Hierarchical Structures of Communication in a Network Organization

  • Achim Oberg
  • Peter Walgenbach
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

The concept of the network organization is presented in the popular management literature as a counter-model to the bureaucratic organization, and one that would increase the flexibility or adaptive capacity of organizations. In order to increase flexibility and adaptability, emphasis is placed in the network organization on the rapid and broad diffusion of information (Probst/Raub/Romhardt 2006). Free communication flows and shared access to information and knowledge are regarded as essential (Cairncross 2001). Thus, contrary to classic theories of organization (March/Simon 1958; Simon 1945; Weber 1968), information should be available to all members of the organization, irrespective of specialization and/or hierarchical position (Koehler/Dupper/Scaff/Reitberger/ Paxson 1998; Levine/Locke/Searls/Weinberger 1999). The network organization is conceived as a group of linked experts (Sproull/Kiesler 1991). These experts however, are not to be understood as pure specialists. On the contrary, it is argued that there should be an overlap in their respective areas of expertise, in order to promote mutual understanding and a recognition of the need for information and knowledge in order to carry out activities efficiently (Mendelson/Ziegler 1999).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamson, E.: Management fashion. In: Academy of Management Review 21, 1996, S. 254–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuja, M.K.; Carley, K.M.: Network structure in virtual organizations. In: Organization Science 10,1999, S. 741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, W.: The network organization in theory and practice. In: N. Nohria, & R. Eccles (eds.):Networks and organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press 1992.Google Scholar
  4. Barnard, C.I.: The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1938.Google Scholar
  5. Batagelj, V; Mrvar, A.: Pajek: Program for large network analysis. In: Connections 21, 2003, S. 47–51.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, P.L.; Luckmann, T.: The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday 1967.Google Scholar
  7. Beyerlein, M.; Johnson, D.: Theories of self-managing work teams. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press 1994.Google Scholar
  8. Brunsson, N.: The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions, and actions in organizations. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School 1989. Google Scholar
  9. Cairncross, F.: The death of distance: How the communications revolution is changing our lives.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press 2001.Google Scholar
  10. Clemens, E.S.; Cook, J.M.: Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. In: Annual Review of Sociology 25, 1999, S. 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cyert, R.M.; March, J.G.: A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 1963.Google Scholar
  12. Czarniawska-Joerges, B.; Joerges, B.: Linguistic artifacts at service of organizational control. In: Gagliardi, P. (ed.): Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 1990, S. 339–364.Google Scholar
  13. Czarniawska, B; Joerges, B.: Travel of ideas. In Czarniawska, B.; Sevón,G. (eds): Translating organizational change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 1996, S. 13–48.Google Scholar
  14. Delmestri, G.; Walgenbach, P.: Mastering techniques or brokering knowledge? Middle managers in Germany, Great Britain and Italy. In: Organization Studies 26, 2005, S. 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A.; Batagelj, V.: Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. New York: Cambridge University Press 2005.Google Scholar
  16. Diestel, R.: Graph Theory. Berlin: Springer 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DiMaggio, P.; Powell, W.W.: The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In: American Sociological Review 48, 1983, S. 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eberwein, W.; Tholen, J.: Managermentalität: Industrielle Unternehmensleitung als Beruf und Politik. In: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 1990.Google Scholar
  19. Eisenhardt, K.: Building theories from case study research. In: Academy of Management Review 14, 1989, S. 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flap, H.; Bulder, B.; Volker, B.: Intra-organizational networks and performance. In: Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 4, 1998, S. 109–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks I: Conceptual clarification. In: Social Networks 1, 1979, S. 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freeman, L.C.; Roeder, D.; Mulholland, R.R.: Centrality in social networks: Experimental results. In: Social Networks 2, 1980, S. 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gillies, J.; Cailliau, R.: How the web was born: The story of the world wide web. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.Google Scholar
  24. Gallivan, M.J.: Striking a balance between trust and control in a virtual organization: A content analysis of open source software case studies. In: Information Systems Journal 11, 2001, S. 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Golumbic, M.: Algorithmic graph theory and perfect graphs. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2004.Google Scholar
  26. Hales, C.P.: What do managers do? A critical review of the evidence. In: Journal of Management Studies 23, 1986, S. 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kieser, A.: Rhetoric and myth in management fashion. In: Organization 4, 1997, S. 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klatzky, S.R.: Relationship of organizational size to complexity and coordination. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 15, 1970, S. 428–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koehler, J.W.; Dupper, T.; Scaff, M.D.; Reitberger, F.; Paxson, P.: The human side of intranets: Content, style & politics. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press 1998.Google Scholar
  30. Krackhardt, D.: Constraints on the interactive organization as an ideal type. In: Heckscher, C.C.; Donnellon, A. (eds.): The post-bureaucratic organization: New perspectives on organizational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1994, S. 211–222.Google Scholar
  31. Krackhardt, D.; Brass, D.J.: Intraorganizational networks: The micro side. In: Wasserman, S.; Galaskiewicz, J. (eds.): Advances in social network analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1994, S. 207–228.Google Scholar
  32. Lane, C.: European business systems: Britain and Germany compared. In: Whitley, R. (ed.): European business systems: Firms and markets in their national contexts. London: Sage 1992, S. 64–97.Google Scholar
  33. Levine, R.; Locke, C.; Searls, D.; Weinberger, D.: The cluetrain manifesto: The end of business as usual. New York: Perseus Books 1999.Google Scholar
  34. Lewin, K.: Frontiers in group dynamics. In: Human Relations 1, 1947, S. 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Malone, T.W.; Rockart, J.F.: Computers, Networks, and the Corporation. Scientific American 3, 1991, S. 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malone, T.W.; Laubacher, R.J.: The dawn of the e-lance economy. In: Harvard Business Review 66, 1998, S. 145–152.Google Scholar
  37. March, J.G.; Simon, H.A.: Organizations. New York: Wiley 1958.Google Scholar
  38. Marchand, D.A.; Davenport, T.H. (eds): Mastering information management. London: Financial Times-Prentice Hall, 2000.Google Scholar
  39. Mendelson, H.; Ziegler, J.: Survival of the smartest – managing information for rapid action and world-class performance. New York: Wiley 1999.Google Scholar
  40. Meyer, J. W.; Rowan, B.: Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In: American Journal of Sociology 83, 1977, S. 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meyer, J.W.; Jepperson, R.L.: The actors of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. In: Sociological Theory 18, 2000, S. 100–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nelson, R.E.: On the shape of verbal networks in organizations. In: Organization Studies 22, 2001, S. 797–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H.: A theory of the firm’s knowledge-creation dynamics. In: Chandler, A.D. jr; Hagström, P.; Ö. Sölvell, Ö. (eds.): The dynamic firm: The role of technology, strategy, organization, and regions. New York, Oxford University Press 1998, S. 214–241.Google Scholar
  44. Oberg, A.; Walgenbach, P.: Modern Talking. Working Paper. University of Mannheim and University of Erfurt, 2007.Google Scholar
  45. Powell, W.W.; DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.): The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1991.Google Scholar
  46. Probst, G.J.B.; Raub, S.; Romhardt, K.: Wissen managen: Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen. 5th edition, Wiesbaden: Gabler 2006.Google Scholar
  47. Pugh, D.S.; Hickson, D.J.; Hinings, C.R.; Truner, C.: Dimensions of organization structure. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 13, 1968, S. 65–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raider, H.; Krackhardt, D.: Intraorganizational networks. In: Baum, J.A.C. (ed.): The Blackwell companion to organizations. Oxford: Blackwell 2002, S. 58–74.Google Scholar
  49. Rogers, E. M.; Agarwala-Rogers, R.: Communication in organizations. New York: Free Press 1976.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenfeld, L.; Morville, P.: Information architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing large-scale web sites. Beijing: O’Reilly 2002.Google Scholar
  51. Scott, W.R.: Institutional analysis: Variance and process theory approaches. In: Scott, W.R.; Meyer, J.W. (eds.): Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1994, S. 81–99.Google Scholar
  52. Scott, W.R.: Institutions and organizations. 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 2001.Google Scholar
  53. Shannon, C.E.; Weaver, W.: Mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1963.Google Scholar
  54. Simon, H.A.: Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press 1945.Google Scholar
  55. Sproull, L.; Kiesler, S.: Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1991.Google Scholar
  56. Stewart, R.: Managers and their jobs: A study of the similarities and differences in the ways managers spend their time. 2nd edition, London: McGraw-Hill 1967.Google Scholar
  57. Stewart, R.; Barsoux, J.L.; Kieser, A.; Ganter, H.D.; Walgenbach, P.: Managing in Britain and Germany. London: MacMillan 1994.Google Scholar
  58. Turau, V.: Algorithmische Graphentheorie. Bonn: Addison-Wesley 1996.Google Scholar
  59. Walton, E.J.: The persistence of bureaucracy: A meta-analysis of Weber’s model of bureaucratic control. In: Organization Studies 26, 2005, S. 569–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weber, M.: From Max Weber: Essay in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press 1946.Google Scholar
  61. Weber, M.: Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1968.Google Scholar
  62. Weinberger, D.: Small pieces loosely joined: A unified theory of the web. New York: Perseus Books 2002.Google Scholar
  63. Whitley, R.: Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999.Google Scholar
  64. Woodward, J.: Industrial organization: Theory and Practice. London: Oxford University Press 1965.Google Scholar
  65. Yates, J.: Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press 1989.Google Scholar
  66. Yin, R.K.: The case study crisis: Some answers. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 26, 1981, S. 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zucker, L.G.: The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. In: American Sociological Review 42, 1977, S. 726–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zucker, L.G.: Organizations as institutions. In: Bacharach, S.B. (ed.): Research in the sociology of organization. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press 1983, S. 1–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Achim Oberg
  • Peter Walgenbach

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations