Network Governance pp 231-254

Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Franchisees’ Websites and Concept Uniformity: A New Challenge for Franchisors

  • Rozenn Perrigot
  • Guy Basset
  • Danièle Briand-Meledo
  • Gérard Cliquet
Chapter

Abstract

This paper aims to highlight the challenges associated with network uniformity and brand image for franchisors, more specifically when their franchisees set up and manage their own website. This practice has some impact on network uniformity which is a key concept in franchising. We analyze the presence of franchisees on the Internet of 471 networks, both in retailing and services, described in the 2011 franchise directory. We find that only 38 franchise networks are concerned about this practice. We use a qualitative approach based on multiple cases studies of these 38 franchise networks. It points out the different aspects of franchisees’ websites that can damage concept uniformity. Maintaining network uniformity when there are various websites set up and run by franchisees entails challenges to franchisors that are presented in this paper within a managerial perspective linked to technical and organizational know-how. Some insights from the legal perspective are also provided.

Keywords

Franchising Franchisees’ websites Internet Uniformity 

References

  1. Brookes M, Roper A (2012) Realising plural-form benefits in international hotel chains. Tour Manage 33(3):580–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caves RE, Murphy WF (1976) Franchising: firms, markets and intangible assets. South Econ J 42:572–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cedrola E, Memmo S (2009) Internet for franchising: current use and areas for improvement – results from an empirical research. J Euromark 18:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dant RP (2008) A futuristic research agenda for the field of franchising. J Small Bus Manage 46(1):91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dant RP, Perrigot R, Cliquet G (2008) A cross-cultural comparison of the plural forms in franchise networks: USA, France, and Brazil. J Small Bus Manage 46(2):286–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixon H, Quinn B (2004) Franchising and the Internet: an exploratory study of franchisor Web sites. Internet Res 14(4):311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dos Santos Silva VL, de Azevedo PF (2007) Interfirm arrangements in different institutional environments: McDonald’s France and Brazil case study. J Mark Channels 14(3):103–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunning JH, Pak YS, Beldona S (2007) Foreign ownership strategies of UK and US international franchisors: an exploratory application of Dunning’s envelope paradigm. Int Bus Rev 16(5):531–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. El Akremi A, Perrigot R, Herrbach O, Mignonac K (2009) What are the know-how that are sources of a competitive advantage in franchising?, Report for the French Franchise Federation (FFF)Google Scholar
  10. Emerson RW (2010) Franchise encroachment. Am Bus Law J 47(2):191–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. European Franchise Federation (2012) European Franchise Website, www.eff-franchise.com
  12. Findley G (2007) Consistency: the key to branding. Franchising World, April: 30–31Google Scholar
  13. Flosdorf G (2002) When it comes to uniforms, franchisees need a perfect fit. Franchising World, February-March: 49–50Google Scholar
  14. Franson B, DeSmith D (2005) Does the Internet solve all of your franchisees’ problems? Franchising World, August: 14–16Google Scholar
  15. French Franchise Federation (2012) Toute la Franchise, les Textes, les Chiffres, les Réseaux, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Gould D (2005) Franchisees must be on board to strengthen brand message. Franchising World, December: 15–18Google Scholar
  17. Guidelines on Vertical Restraints (2010) 2010/C 130/01 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:130:0001:0046:EN:PDF
  18. Hair JF, Wolfinbarger M, Bush RP, Ortinau DJ (2008) Essentials of marketing research. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalnins A (2004) An empirical analysis of territorial encroachment within franchised and company-owned branded chains. Mark Sci 23(4):476–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaufmann PJ, Cliquet G, Achabal DD (2010) Implementing multi-channel strategies: issues and opportunities for franchise system websites. Proceedings of the 24th ISoF Conference, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaufmann PJ, Eroglu S (1998) Standardization and adaptation in business format franchising. J Bus Venturing 14:69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein B (1995) The economics of franchise contracts. J Corp Finance 2:9–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lafontaine F (1998) Franchising versus corporate ownership: the effect on price dispersion. J Bus Venturing 14(1):17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oseland BJ (1995) Managing brand identity. Franchising World, January/February: 27–28Google Scholar
  25. Perrigot R, Herrbach O (2012) The plural form from the inside: a study of franchisee perception of company-owned outlets within their network. Int J Retail Distrib Manage 40(7):544–563Google Scholar
  26. Perrigot R, Herrbach O, El Akremi A (2011) L’impact de la mixité sur la maîtrise des savoir-faire organisationnels des franchiseurs. Economies et Sociétés 13(6):1007–1024Google Scholar
  27. Perrigot R, Pénard T (forthcoming – 2013) Determinants of E-commerce Strategy in Franchising: A Resource-Based View, International Journal of Electronic CommerceGoogle Scholar
  28. Perrigot R, López-Fernández B, Eroglu S (forthcoming) Intangible resources and plural form as drivers of franchise internationalization: examination within a two-country perspective. J Small Bus Manage (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  29. Plave LJ, Almosch RB (2000) How to implement dot.com franchising solutions: two aspects of a multi-faceted issue. Franchising World, September/October, 17–19Google Scholar
  30. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2011) Highlights of the 2011 Franchise Business Economic OutlookGoogle Scholar
  31. Rao S, Frazer L (2006) Australian franchisor websites; moving towards network behaviour. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 1(1):56–64Google Scholar
  32. Rogers J, Bennett C, Grewal S (2007) E-commerce for successful franchisors. Franchising World 39(8):23–24Google Scholar
  33. Streed O (2007) The issue of brand uniformity in franchising. Proceedings of the 21st ISoF Conference, Las VegasGoogle Scholar
  34. Streed O, Cliquet G (2008) Concept uniformity: control versus freedom in business franchising. In: Hendrikse G, Tuunanen M, Windsperger J, Cliquet G (eds) Strategy and Governance of Networks, Cooperatives, Franchising, and Strategic Alliances Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 205–220Google Scholar
  35. Trice M (2001) Managing Internet issues within the franchise system: a legal perspective. Franchising World 33(5):37Google Scholar
  36. Weaven S, Frazer L (2007a) Mature franchise systems use multiple unit franchising to leverage learning economies and sustain system wide growth. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 19(2):107–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weaven S, Frazer L (2007b) Expansion through multiple unit franchising: Australian franchisors reveal their motivations. Int Small Bus J 25(2):173–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rozenn Perrigot
    • 1
  • Guy Basset
    • 2
  • Danièle Briand-Meledo
    • 3
  • Gérard Cliquet
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of ManagementUniversity of Rennes 1 & ESC Rennes, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM UMR CNRS 6211) & Institute for Business Law, Estate and Torts (CDA-PR UPRES EA 3195)Rennes Cedex 7France
  2. 2.Graduate School of ManagementUniversity of Rennes 1, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM UMR CNRS 6211)Rennes Cedex 7France
  3. 3.Faculty of Law and Political ScienceUniversity of Rennes 1, Institute for Business Law, Estate and Torts (CDA-PR UPRES EA 3195), and lawyerRennes CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations