Towards a Classification of Maturity Models in Information Systems

  • Tobias MettlerEmail author
  • Peter Rohner
  • Robert Winter
Conference paper


Over the past years, a wide range of maturity models have been developed by practitioners as well as academics for the purpose of measuring and prescribing certain aspects of information systems “maturity”. Since, to our knowledge, no classification system for maturity models exists to date, the rising number of maturity models implicates problems with respect to retrievability and reusability. Aiming at enhancing the time consuming and exhausting search and selection process of appropriate assessment models, a classification approach for IS maturity models is presented in this paper. Based on a broad literature review that yields 117 maturity models which are analysed in detail, the following classification characteristics are proposed: (a) a set of general model attributes that describe basic characteristics (such as the topic addressed by the model, the primary source or the targeted audience), (b) maturity model design attributes (relating to the construction and organisation of the model) and (c) maturity model use attributes (such as application method or tool support)


Information System Maturity Model Design Science Research Capability Maturity Model Software Engineer Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ahern DM, Clouse A, Turner R (2004)CMMI distilled: a practical introduction to integrated process improvement. Addison-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paulk MC, Curtis B, Chrissis MB, Weber CV (1993) Capability maturity model, version 1.1, IEEE Softw 10(4):18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fraser P, Moultrie J, Gregory M (2002)IEEE international engineering management conference. The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hakes C (1996) The corporate self assessment handbook. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crosby PB(1979)Quality is free: the art of making quality certain. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibson CF, Nolan RL (1974)Managing the four stages of EDP growth.Harv Bus Rev 52(1):76–88Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheperd E (2009) Other+Maturity+Models. Accessed 12 May 2009
  8. 8.
    Simpson JA, Weiner ES C (1989)The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bacon JC, Fitzgerald B (2001) A systemic framework for the field of information systems, Data Base Adv Inf Syst 32(2):46–67Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fettke P, Loos P (2003)Classification of reference models: a methodology and its application. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 1(1):35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (2006) Accessed 12 May 2009
  12. 12.
    Mettler T (2009) A design science research perspective on maturity models in information systems. Working Paper, Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, St. GallenGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marshall SJ, Mitchell G (2004). Applying SPICE to e-learning: an e-learning maturity model? In Proceedings of the 6th Australasian computing education conference. Dunedin, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chrissis MB, Konrad M, Shrum S(2003)CMMI: Guidelines for process integration and product improvement. Addison-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gericke A, Rohner P, Winter R (2006) Vernetzungsfähigkeit im Gesundheitswesen – Notwendigkeit, Bewertung und systematische Entwicklung als Voraussetzung zur Erhöhung der Wirtschaftlichkeit administrativer Prozesse. HMD-Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 251:20–30Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gillies A, Howard J(2003)Managing change in process and people: combining a maturity model with a competency-based approach.Total Qual Manage Bus Excell 14(7):779–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Bruin T, Freeze R, Kulkarni U, Rosemann M (2005). Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model, In Proceedings of the 16th Australasian conference on information systems.Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Conwell CL, Enright R, Stutzman MA (2000)Winter simulation conference. Capability maturity models support of modeling and simulation verification, validation, and accreditation, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Biberoglu E, Haddad H(2002)A survey of industrial experiences with CMM and the teaching of CMM practices.J Comput Sci Coll 18(2):143–152Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations