Study of Urban Developers’ Behavior in a Game Environment

  • Erez Hatna
  • Itzhak Benenson

Abstract

Most urban models accept the assumptions of the Markov processes: the state and location of each urban object at time step t+1 are defined by its state, location and environmental conditions at t. This assumption is not at all evident, just because the city is developed by humans who have memory and might implement long-term development plans, and, thus demands confirmations. The Markov nature of developers’ behavior is investigated on the base of laboratory experiments, in which 30 participants were asked to construct a ‘city’ on the floor of a hall; each participant had to use the same set of mock-up buildings. Each mock-up established was represented as a feature of GIS layer, and its urban function, given by the participant, was recorded. The analysis of participants’ behavior reveals that the relation between the urban pattern on the step t of the experiment and the decision regarding the urban function and location of the mock-up at t+1 is very close to assumed by the Markov theory. Based on the experimental results, spatially explicit model of participants’ behavior was further constructed. The comparison between the experimental and the model patters, in their dynamics, clearly favor the idea of a shared Markov process as the basis for representing human urban development behavior. In the same time, with the increase in city complexity, the spectrum of participants’ behavior becomes wider that that of the model and some participants tends to deviate from it This experiment is a preliminary yet important step towards the experimental study of decision-making behavior among real developers and planners, which provide the basis for description of the real-world urban dynamics.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell EJ (1974) Markov analysis of land use change: an application of stochastic processes to remotely sensed data. Socio-Economic Planning Science 8: 311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benenson I, Omer I, Hatna E (2002) Entity-based modeling of urban residential dynamics — the case of Yaffo, Tel-Aviv. Environment and Planning B 29: 491–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benenson I, Torrens PM (2004) Geosimulation: automata-based modeling of urban phenomena. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Boerner REJ, DeMers MN, Simpson JW, Artigas FJ, Silva A, Berns LA (1996) Markov models of inertia and dynamism on two continuous Ohio landscapes. Geographical Analysis 28:1: 56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown DG, Pijanowski BC, Duh JD (2002) Modeling the relationships between land use and land cover on private lands in the Upper Midwest, USA. Journal of Environmental Management 59: 247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1996) Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality. Psychological Review 103:4: 650–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gobin A, Campling P, Feyen J (2002) Logistic modelling to derive agricultural land use determinants: a case study from southeastern Nigeria. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 89:3: 213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hathout S (2002) The use of GIS for monitoring and predicting urban growth in East and West St Paul, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Journal of Environmental Management 66: 229–238Google Scholar
  10. Isaacson DL, Madsen RW (1976) Markov chains: theory and applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Jahan S (1986) The Determination Of Stability And Similarity Of Markovian Land Use Change Processes:A Theoretical And Empirical Analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 20:4: 243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. LaGro JA, DeGloria SD (1992) Land use dynamics within an urbanizing non-metropolitan county in New York State (USA). Landscape Ecology 7:4: 275–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lopez E, Bocco G, Mendoza M, Duhau E (2001) Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe A case in Morelia city, Mexico. Landscape and Urban Planning 55: 271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pentland A, Liu A (1999) Modeling and prediction of human behavior. Neural Computation 11: 229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Portugali J (1996) Inter-representation networks and cognitive maps. In: Portugali J (eds) The construction of cognitive maps. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 11–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Portugali J (2000) Self-Organization and the City. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Portugali J (2002) The Seven Basic Propositions of SIRN (Synergetic Inter-Representation Networks). Nonlinear Phenomena in Complex Systems 5:4: 428–444Google Scholar
  18. Robinson VB (1978a) Information Theory and Sequences of Land Use: An Application. Professional Geographer 30: 174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robinson VB (1978b) Land Use Change on the Urban Fringe: A Stochastic Model Analysis. Discussion Paper No 3, Department of Geography, Kent State University, OhioGoogle Scholar
  20. Rubinstein A (1998) Modeling bounded rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Seetharaman PB (2003) Probabilistic versus random-utility models of state dependence: an empirical comparison. International Journal of Research in Marketing 20:1: 87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weng Q (2002) Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang Delta of China using satellite remote sensing, GIS and stochastic modelling. Journal of Environmental Management 64:3: 273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yeh AGO, Li X (2002) A cellular automata model to simulate development density for urban planning. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design 29:3: 431–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg and Accademia di Architettura, Mendrisio, Switzerland 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erez Hatna
    • 1
  • Itzhak Benenson
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Simulation Laboratory (ESLab)Tel Aviv UniversityIsrael

Personalised recommendations