The Dynamics of Complex Urban Systems pp 213-243 | Cite as
Fractal Geometry for Measuring and Modelling Urban Patterns
Abstract
Urban growth generates nowadays patterns, which look rather irregular. Planning policy regrets the lack of compactness and density of these agglomerations, but controlling urban sprawl turns out to be difficult. Obviously a new type of spatial organisation emerges, which is rather the result of a self-organisation process to which a high number of social agents contribute. In the present contribution we focus on the use of fractal geometry which turned out to be a powerful instrument for describing the morphology of these patterns.
After an introduction about the context of research, fractal models are presented, which serve as reference models for better understanding the spatial organisation of settlement patterns. Then the methodology for measuring their morphology by means of fractal parameters is explained. Moreover different peculiar topics are considered like a specific approach of urban boundaries. Then an overview is given over results obtained for a couple of agglomerations in different European countries. The interpretation of these results allows establishing links between urban planning policy and pattern morphology. Applying the idea of self-organisation leads to introducing a fractal order parameter for studying the emergent fractal order in urban patterns. The presentation of these quantitative results will be completed by some reflections about how planning concepts based on fractal geometry may help to manage more efficiently urban sprawl.
Keywords
Fractal Dimension Spatial Organisation Fractal Geometry Urban Sprawl Black PixelPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Allen P, Sanglier M (1981) Urban evolution, self-organisation and decision making. Environment and Planning, 13:167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Batty M (1991) Generating urban forms from diffusive growth. Environment and Planning A 23: 511–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Batty M, Longley PA (1986) The fractal simulation of Urban Structure. Environment and Planning A 18: 1143–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Batty M, Longley P (1994) Fractal Cities. A Geometry of Form and Function. Academic Press, San Diego, p. 394Google Scholar
- Batty M, Kim SK (1992) Form Follows Function: Reformulating Urban Population Density Functions. Urban Studies 29:7: 1043–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Batty M, Xie Y (1996) Preliminary evidence for a theory of the fractal city. Environment and Planning A 28: 1745–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Benguigui L, Czamanski D, Marinov M, Portugali J (2000) When and where is a city fractal? Environment and Planning B 27:4: 507–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cavailhès J, Frankhauser P, Peeters D, Thomas I (2004) Where Alonso meets Sierpinski: an urban economic model of a fractal metropolitan area. Environment and Planning A 36: 1471–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christaller W (1933) Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
- De Keersmaecker, ML, Frankhauser P, Thomas I (2003) Using Fractal Dimensions for Characterizing Intra-Urban Diversity: The Example of Brussels. Geographical Analysis 35: 310–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dubois-Taine G, Chalas Y (eds) (1997) La ville émergente. Edition de l’Aube, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Dubois-Taine G (coord. by) (2002) La ville émergente, Résultats de Recherche. Report PUCA, Ministère de l’Equipement, des Transports, du Logement, du Tourisme et de la Mer, Paris, p 205Google Scholar
- Dubois-Taine G (ed) (2004) European Cities — Insights on outskirts, Report COST Action 10 Urban Civil Engineering. Vol 1: From Helsinki to Nicosia. Eleven Case Studies & Synthesis, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Fouchier V (1995) La densification: une comparaison internationale entre politiques contrastées. Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine 67: 94–108Google Scholar
- Frank H (1987) Idee, Prozess, Ergebnis. Die Reparatur und Rekonstruktion der Stadt. In: Die überwindung der Stadtbaukunst, Internationale Bauausstellung Berlin. Fröhlich und Kaufmann, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Frankhauser P (1988) Fractal aspects of urban systems. Beiträge zum ersten Internationalen Symposium des SFB 230 Teil 1. SFB 230, Stuttgart, pp 67–76Google Scholar
- Frankhauser P (1994) La fractalité des structures urbaines. Collection Villes, Anthropos, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Frankhauser P (1998) The fractal approach. A new tool for the spatial analysis of urban agglomerations. Population: an English selection, special issue New Methododlogical Approaches in Social Sciences, pp 205–240Google Scholar
- Frankhauser P, Genre-Grandpierre C (1998) La géométrie fractale, un nouvel outil pour évaluer le rôle de la morphologie des réseaux de transport public dans l’organisation spatiale des agglomérations. Les Cahiers Scientifiques du Transport 33: 41–78Google Scholar
- Frankhauser P (2000). La fragmentation des espaces urbains et périurbains-une approche fractale. Structures des villes, entreprise et marchés urbains, l’Harmattan, collection Emploi, Industrie et Territoire, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Frankhauser P (coord. by) (2003) Morphologie des villes émergentes en Europe à travers les analyses fractales. Research Report, Université de Franche-Comté, UMR 6049 THEMA, p 240Google Scholar
- Frankhauser P (2004) Comparing the morphology of urban patterns in Europe — a fractal approach. European Cities — Insights on outskirts, Report COST Action 10 Urban Civil Engineering, vol 2: Structures, Borsdorf and Zembri, Brussels, pp 79–105Google Scholar
- Frankhauser P, Tannier C (2005) A multi-scale morphological approach for delimiting urban areas. Working-paper presented at the Conference “Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management”, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Gouyet JF (1992) Physique et structures fractales. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Haag G, Dendrinos DS (1983) Towards a stochastic dynamical theory of lmocation: a nonlinear migration process. Geographical Analysis 15: 269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haken H (1978) Synergetics: An Introduction. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Humpert K, Brenner K, Bohm H (1991) Großstädtische Agglomerationen,-ein globales Problem. Natürliche Konstruktionen, vol 1, SFB 230, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
- Humpert K, Brenner K (1992) Das Phänomen der Stadt als fraktale Struktur. In: Das Phänomen der Stadt. Berichte aus Forschung and Lehre, Städtebauliches Institut, Universität Stuttgart, pp 223–269Google Scholar
- Humpert K, Brenner K, Becker S (2002) Fundamental Principles of Urban Growth. An Analysis of 57 cities. Müller und Busmann, WuppertalGoogle Scholar
- Le Bras H (1993) La planète au village. Editions de l’Aube, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Longley P, Mesev V (2000) On the Measurement and Generalisation of Urban Form. Environment and Planning A 32:3: 471–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mandelbrot B (1983) The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Pumain D, Saint Julien T, Sanders L (1989) Ville et auto-organisation. Economica, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Rémy J (1994) La ville: réseau alvéolaire et mobilité spatiale. In: Pellegrino P (ed) Figures architecturales, formes urbaines. Anthropos, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Schöfl G (1986) Minimalnetze. arcus 2 Google Scholar
- Schweitzer F, Steinbrick J (1998) Estimation of Megacity Growth. Simple rules versus complex phenomena. Applied Geography 18:1: 69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schweitzer F, Steinbrick J (2002) Analysis and computer simulations of urban cluster distribution. In: Humpert K, Becker S, Brenner K (eds) Fundamental Principles of Urban Growth. Müller und Busmann, Wuppertal, pp 142–157Google Scholar
- Schweitzer F (2003) Brownian agents and Active Particles. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Shen G (2002) Fractal dimension and fractal growth of urbanized areas. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16:5: 519–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sievert T (1997) Zwischenstadt. Bauwelt Fundamente 118: 193Google Scholar
- Tannier C, Pumain D (2005) Fractals in urban geography: a general outline and an empirical example. Cybergeo 307: 22 http://www.cybergeo.presse.frGoogle Scholar
- Thomas I, Frankhauser P (2005) Fractal dimension, morphology of the built-up surfaces and land-use planning. Paper presented at the 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Weidlich W, Munz M (1990) Settlement formation. Part 1: A Dynamic Theory; Part 2: Numerical Simulation. The Annals of Regional Science 24: 83–106, 177–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- White R, Engelen G (1993) Cellular Automata and Fractal Urban Form: A cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A 25: 1175–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- White R, Engelen G (1994) Urban Systems Dynamics and Cellular Automata: Fractal Structures between Order and Chaos. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 4:4: 563–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar