Advertisement

Interval and Ellipsoidal Uncertainty Models

  • Andrzej Bargiela
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 70)

Abstract

In this Chapter, we present results derived in the context of state estimation of a class of real-life systems that are driven by some poorly known factors. For these systems, the representation of uncertainty as confidence intervals or the ellipsoids offers significant advantages over the more traditional approaches with probabilistic representation of noise. While the filtered-white-Gaussian noise model can be defined on grounds of mathematical convenience, its use is necessarily coupled with a hope that an estimator with good properties in idealised noise will still perform well in real noise. With good knowledge of the plant and its environment, a sufficiently accurate approximation to the probability density function can be obtained, but shortage of prior information or excessive computing demands normally rule out this option. A more realistic approach is to match the noise representation to the extent of prior knowledge. The relative merits of interval and ellipsoidal representations of noise are discussed in a set theoretic setting and are illustrated using both a simple synthetic example and a real-life scenario of state estimation of a water distribution system.

Keywords

System modeling Uncertainty confidence limit analysis interval analysis ellipsoid methods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bargiela, A. (1985). An algorithm for observability determination in water systems state estimation, Proc. IEE, Vol. 132, Pt. D, No. 6, 245–249.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bargiela, A., Hainsworth, G.D. (1989). Pressure and flow uncertainty in water systems, ASCE J. Water Res. Planning and Management, 115, 2, 212–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bargiela, A. (1994). Ellipsoid method for quantifying the uncertainty in water system state estimation, Proc. IEE Colloquium on Modelling Uncertain Systems, Vol. 1994/105, 10/1–10/3.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bargiela, A. (1998). Uncertainty – A key to better understanding of systems, (Plenary lecture) Proc. European Simulation Symposium ESS’98, ISBN 1–56555–147–8, 11 – 19.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bargiela, A. (2000). Operational decision support through confidence limit analysis and pattern classification, (Plenary lecture) Proc. 5 th Int. Conf. Computer Simulation and AI, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Belforte, G., Bona, B. (1985). An improved parameter identification algorithm for signals with unknown-but-bounded errors, Proc. IFAC/IFORS., York.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cichocki, A., Bargiela, A. (1997). Neural networks for solving linear inequality systems, Parallel Computing, Vol. 22, No. 11, 1455–1475.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fogel, E., Huang, Y.F. (1982). On the value of information system identification - bounded noise case, Automatica, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gabrys, B., Bargiela, A. (1999). Neural networks based decision support in presence of uncertainties, ASCE J. of Water Res. Planning and Management, Vol. 125, 5, 272–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gabrys, B., Bargiela, A. (1999). Analysis of uncertainties in water systems using neural networks, Measurement and Control, Vol. 32, No. 5, 145–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hains worth, G.D. (1988). Measurement uncertainty in water distribution telemetry systems, PhD thesis, The Nottingham Trent University.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartley, J.K., Bargiela, A. (1997). Parallel state estimation with confidence limit analysis, Parallel Algorithms and Applications, Vol., 11, No. 1–2, 155–167.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jaulin, L., Walter, E. (1996). Guaranteed nonlinear set estimation via interval analysis, in: Bounding approaches to system identification (Milanese et al, eds.), Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kandel, A. (1992). Fuzzy expert systems, CRC Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mo, S.H., Norton, J.P. (1988). Parameter bounding identification algorithms for bounded-noise records, Proc. IEE, Vol. 135, Pt D, No. 2.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moore, R.E. (1966). Interval analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Norton, J.P. (1986). An Introduction to Identification, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pedrycz, W., Vukovich, G. (1999). Data-based design of fuzzy sets, Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, Vol. 9, No. 3.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pedrycz, W., Gomide, F. (1998). An introduction to Fuzzy Sets. Analysis and Design, MTT Press, Cambridge, MA.MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pedrycz, W., Smith M.H., Bargiela, A. (2000), A Granular Signature of Data, Proc. NAFIPS’2000.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ratschek, A., Rokne, J. (1988), New computer methods for global optimization, Ellis Horwood Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rokne, J.G., Interval arythmetic and interval analysis: An introduction, in: Granular Computing (Pedrycz ed.), Elsevier.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schweppe, F.C. (1973). Uncertain dynamic systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sterling, M.J.H., Bargiela, A. (1984). Minimum-norm state estimation for computer control of water distribution systems, Proc. IEE, Part D, Vol. 131, 57–63.MATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Warmus, M. (1956). Calculus of approximations, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., CI III 4, 253–259.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zadeh, L.A. (1979). Fuzzy sets and information granularity, in Gupta, M.M., Ragade, R.K., Yager, R.R. (eds.), Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrzej Bargiela
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ComputingThe Nottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations