The Design of an Eco-Marketing and Labeling Program for Vehicles in Maine

  • Mario F. Teisl
  • Caroline Lundquist Noblet
  • Jonathan Rubin
Part of the Sustainability and Innovation book series (SUSTAINABILITY)


Consumer Research Purchase Decision Passenger Vehicle Consumer Policy Vehicle Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson R (2003) Do forest certification ecolabels impact consumer behaviour? Presented at CINTRAFOR’S (Centre for International Trade in Forest Products) 20th Annual International Forest Products Market Conference, Seattle WA, 16–17 OctoberGoogle Scholar
  2. Angus Reid Group (1991) Environment USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Balderjahn I (1988) Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17: 51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamberg S (2003) How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviours? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bei LT, Widdows R (1999), ‘Product knowledge and product involvement as moderators of the effects of information on purchase decisions: a case study using the perfect information frontier approach’. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 33:165–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjørner TB, Hansen L, Russell CS (2004) Environmental labelling and consumers’ choice — an empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic Swan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47:411–34zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blamey R, Bennett J (2001) Yea-saying and validation of a choice model of green product choice. In: Bennett and Blaney (eds) The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Evaluation, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar., pp 178–201Google Scholar
  8. Brown AS, Brown LA, Zoccoli SL (2002) Repetition-based credibility enhancement of unfamiliar faces, American Journal of Psychology, 115:199–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brownstone D, Bunch DS, Golob TF (1996a) A demand forecasting system for clean-fuel vehicles. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Towards clean transportation: Fuel efficient and clean motor vehicles. Publications Service, OECD. ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Brownstone D, Bunch DS, Golob TF, Ren W (1996b) A vehicle transactions choice model for use in forecasting demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. Research in Transportation Economics. Vol. 4:87–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bunch DS, Brownstone D, Golob TF (1996) A dynamic forecasting system for vehicle markets with clean-fuel vehicles. Hensher DA, King J, Oum TH (eds) World Transport Research. Vol.1:189–203.Google Scholar
  12. Coupey E (1994) Restructuring: constructive processing of information displays in consumer choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1): 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donovan GH, Nicholls DL (2003) Estimating consumer willingness to pay a price premium for Alaska secondary wood products. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Research Paper PNW-RP-553, October.Google Scholar
  14. Enger A, Lavik R (1995) Eco-labelling in Norway: consumer knowledge and attitudes. In: Stø E (ed), Sustainable Consumption. Report from the International Conference on Sustainable Consumption, Lysaker (Norway): National Institute for Consumer Research (SIFO), pp 479–502.Google Scholar
  15. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2004) Green vehicle guide. Scholar
  16. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2005) EPAs personal greenhouse gas calculator CenterTools GHGCalculator.html-accessed on Monday 12/05/2005.Google Scholar
  17. Ford GT, Smith RA (1987) Inferential beliefs in consumer evaluations: an assessment of alternative processing strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 14:363–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gould J, Golob TF (1998) Clean air forever? A longitudinal analysis of opinions about air pollution and electric vehicles. Transportation Research-D: Transport and the Environment, 3: 157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grankvist G, Biel A (2001) The importance of beliefs and purchase criteria in the choice of eco-labelled food products. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21: 405–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henry G, Gordon C (2003) Driving less for better air: impacts of a public information campaign. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(1): 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heschner DA, Greene WH (2002) Specification and estimation of the nested logit model: alternative normalizations. Transportation Research Part B, 36:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunt G (2000) Alternative nested logit model structures and the special case of partial degeneracy Journal of Regional Science 40:89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaccard J, Wood G (1988) The effects of incomplete information on the formation of attitudes toward behavioural alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (April): 580–91.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson RD, Levin IP (1985) More than meets the eye: the effects of missing information on purchasing evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (April): 169–77.Google Scholar
  25. Lee DH, Olshavsky RW (1997) Consumers’ use of alternative information sources in inference generation: a replication study. Journal of Business Research, 39(3): 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee J, Geistfeld LV (1998) Enhancing consumer choice: are we making appropriate recommendations? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(2): 227–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee and Holden (1999) Understanding the determinants of environmentally conscious behaviour. Psychology and Marketing, 16(5): 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levy AS, Derby BM, Roe B (1996) Health claims quantitative study. Briefing presented to the International Food Information Council, US Food and Drug Administration, Washington DC, 8 October.Google Scholar
  29. MacKenzie D (1991) The rise of the green consumer. Consumer Policy Review, 1(2): 68–75.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. National Auto Dealers Association (2004) NADA Appraisal Guides, Inc., On-line New Vehicle Price Guide. http://www2.nadaguides.comGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Brien KA, Teisl MF (2004) Eco-information and its effect on consumer values for environmentally certified forest products. Journal of Forest Economics. 10:75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ozanne LK, Vlosky RP (2003) Certification from the U.S. Consumer perspective: a comparison of 1995 and 2000. Forest Products Journal, 53(3): 13–21.Google Scholar
  33. Peattie K (1995) Environmental Marketing Management: Meeting the Green Challenge, London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  34. Roe B, Levy AS, Derby BM (1999) The impact of health claims on consumer search and product evaluation outcomes: results from FDA experimental data. Journal of Public Policy and Management, 18(Spring): 89–105.Google Scholar
  35. Roe B, Sheldon IM (2002) The impacts of labelling on trade in goods that may be vertically differentiated according to quality. In: Bohman M, Caswell J, Krissoff B (eds) Global food trade and consumer demand for quality, Boston, MA: Kluwer/Plenum Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Ross W, Creyer EH (1992) Making inferences about missing information: the effects of existing information. Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (June): 14–25.Google Scholar
  37. Russell CS, Clark CD (1999) The potential effectiveness of the provision of consumer information on product environmental characteristics as a regulatory tool. SØM Meeting in Fredricksdahl, Denmark, 21–23 November.Google Scholar
  38. Scammon DL (1977) Information load and consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 4 (December): 148–55.Google Scholar
  39. Schkade DA, Kleinmuntz DN (1994) Information displays and choice processes: differential effects of organization, form, and sequence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57(3): 319–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schlegelmilch B, Bohlen GM, Diamantopoulos A (1996) The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30(5): 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simmons CJ, Lynch Jr. JG (1991) Inference effects without inference making? Effects of missing information on discounting and use of presented information. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (March): 477–91.Google Scholar
  42. Stern PC (1999) Information, incentives and proenvironmental consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Policy, 22: 461–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 407–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sutherland RJ, Walsh RG (1985) Effect of distance on the preservation of ware quality. Land Economics, 61(3): 281–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Teisl MF (2003) What we may have is a failure to communicate: labeling environmentally certified forest products. Forest Science, 49(5): 13.Google Scholar
  46. Teisl MF, Bockstael NE, Levy AS (2001a) Measuring the welfare effects of nutrition information. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 83(1): 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Teisl MF, Peavey S, O’Brien KA (2001b) Environmental certification and labelling of forest products: will it lead to more environmentally benign forestry in Maine? Maine Policy Review, 10(1): 72–8.Google Scholar
  48. Teisl MF, Roe B (2005) Evaluating the factors that impact the effectiveness of eco-labelling programs. In: Krarup S, Russell CS (eds) Environment, information and consumer behaviour, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 65–90Google Scholar
  49. Teisl MF, Roe B, Levy AS (1999) Eco-certification: why it may not be a field of dreams. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(5): 1066–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teisl MF, Roe B, Hicks RL (2002) Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labeling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43:339–59zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Teisl MF, Rubin J, Noblet CL, Cayting L, Morrill M, Brown T, Jones S (2004) Designing effective environmental labels for passenger vehicles sales in Maine: results of focus group research. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station, Miscellaneous Report 434.Google Scholar
  52. Thøgersen J (1999) The ethical consumer. Moral norms and packaging choice. Journal of Consumer Policy, 22:439–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thøgersen J (2000a) Promoting green consumer behaviour with eco-labels. National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council Workshop on Education, Information and Voluntary Measures in Environmental Protection. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  54. Thøgersen J. (2000b) Psychological Determinants of Paying Attention to Eco-Labels in Purchase Decisions: Model Development and Multinational Validation. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23: 285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thøgersen J (2000c) Promoting green consumer behaviour with eco-labels. Workshop on Education, Information and Voluntary Measures in Environmental Protection, National Academy of Science-National Research Council, Washington, DC, 29–30 November.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario F. Teisl
    • 1
  • Caroline Lundquist Noblet
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jonathan Rubin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Resource Economics and PolicyUniversity of MaineUSA
  2. 2.Margaret Chase Smith Policy CenterUniversity of MaineUSA

Personalised recommendations