The articles appearing in our volumes usually present either a survey of a field in which a rather complete picture can be given, or they discuss less explored fields in which it is hoped that a survey offered at an early stage of research may have a stimulating effect on further progress. The present article belongs to the second category.


Aluminum Hydroxide Paper Chromatography Enzyme Mixture Filter Paper Disk Tricalcium Phosphate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adler, E. u. M. Michaelis: Über die Komponenten der Dehydrasesysterne. X. Zur Kenntnis der Milchsäuredehydrase und der Äpfelsäuredehydrase aus Herzmuskel. Z. physiol. Chem. 238, 261 (1936).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agner, K.: The Preparation and Properties of a Highly Active Catalase from Horse Liver. Biochemic. J. 32, 1702 (1938).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altschul, A. M., A. E. Sidwell, Jr. and T. R. Hogness: Note on the Preparation and Properties of Hemoglobin. J. biol. Chemistry 127, 123 (1939).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brücke, E.: Beiträge zur Lehre von der Verdauung. 2. Abt. I. Das Pepsin. S.-B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math.-naturw. Kl. 43, 601 (1861).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carroll, B.: Use of Dyestuffs for Determining the Activity of Proteolytic Enzymes. Science 111, 387 (1950).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chargaff, E. and J. Kream: Procedure for the Study of Certain Enzymes in Minute Amounts and its Application to the Investigation of Cytosine Deaminase. J. biol. Chemistry 175, 993 (1948).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chromatography. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 49, 141 (1948).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chromatographie Analysis. Discuss. Faraday Soc. b (1949). London: Gurney and Jackson.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Claesson, I. and S. Claesson: The Adsorption of Some High Molecular Substances on Active Carbon. Ark. Kem., Mineral. Geol. 19 A, No. 5 (1945).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Claesson, S.: High Molecular Polymers Separation. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 7, 321 (1949).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Consden, H., A. H. Gordon and A. J. P. Martin: Qualitative Analysis of Proteins: a Partition Chromatographic Method Using Paper. Biochemic. J. 38, 224 (1944).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cori, G. T., C. F. Cori and G. Schmidt: The Rôle of Glucose-1-phosphate in the Formation of Blood Sugar and Synthesis of Glycogen in the Liver. J. biol. Chemistry 129, 629 (1939).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cremer, H.-D. u. A. Tiselius: Elektrophorese von Eiweiß auf Filtrierpapier. Biochem. Z. 320, 273 (1950).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Das, N.: Über die Komponenten der Dehydrasesysteme. XI. Zur Kenntnis der Glucosedehydrase aus Leber. Z. physiol. Chem. 238, 269 (1936).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Datta, S. P., C. E. Dent and H. Harris: Apparatus for Mass-Production Two-Way Paper Chromatography. Biochemic. J. 46, XLII (1950).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Datta, S. P., C. E. Dent and H. Harris: An Apparatus for the Simultaneous Production of Many Twodimensional Paper Chromatograms. Science 112, 621 (1950).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Enselme, J., R. Creyssel et A. Rapatel: Isolement d’orthodiphénolases végétales par Chromatographie. Bull. Soc. Chim. biol. (Paris) 29, 939 (1947).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Euler, H. von u. E. Adler: Über die Komponenten der Dehydrasesysteme. IX. Die Co-Dehydrasen: Co-Zymase und, Co-Dehydrase II“. Co-Zymase als Wasserstoffüberträger. Z. physiol. Chem. 238, 233 (1936).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Euler, H. von u. A. Fono: Adsorptive reversible Inaktivierung einer tierischen Glycerophosphatase. Ark. Kern., Mineral. Geol. 25 A, No. 15 (1947).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Euler, H. von and L. Hahn: Influence of Roentgen Rays on Isolated Cell Nuclei. Acta Radiol. 27, 269 (1946).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Euler, H. von u. H. Hellström: Reinigung tierischer Succinodehydrase. Svensk kern. Tidskr. 51, 68 (1939) [Chem. Zbl. 1940, I, 2323].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Euler, H. von, H. Hellström and G. Günther: Enzymatische Sarcom-Studien. Ark. Kern., Mineral. Geol. 13 B, No. 8 (1939).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Euler, H. von u. F. Schlenk: Co-Zymase. Z. physiol. Chem. 246, 64 (1937).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Feigl, F.: Qualitative Analysis by Spot Tests. Inorganic and Organic Applications, pp. 421–424. New York and Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1946.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fischer, Ed. H., F. Duckert et P. Bernfeld: Isolement et cristallisation de l’α-amylase de pancréas humain. Sur les enzymes amylolytiques. XIV. Helv. chim. Acta 33, 1060 (1950).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Franklin, A. E. and J. H. Quastel: Paper Chromatography of Proteins and Enzymes. Science 110, 447 (1949).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    French, D. and D. W. Knapp: The Maltase of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Its Specificity Range and Mode of Action. J. biol. Chemistry 187, 463 (1950).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grassmann, W., L. Zechmeister, G. Tóth u. R. Stadler: Über den enzymatischen Abbau der Zellulose und ihre Spaltprodukte. 2. Mitt. über enzymatische Spaltung von Polysacchariden. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 503, 167 (1933).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grundmann, Ch.: Chromatographie und verwandte Methoden in der Enzymchemie. In: E. Bamann und K. Myrbäck, Die Methoden der Enzymforschung, Bd. II, S. 1452. Leipzig: G. Thieme. 1941.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grüss, J.: Capillaranalyse einiger Enzyme. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 26, 8 (1908).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grüss, J.: Capillarisation der Fermente. In: C. Oppenheimer und L. Pincussen, Die Fermente und ihre Wirkungen. Bd. III. Die Methodik der Fermente. S. 1442. Leipzig: G. Thieme. 1929.Google Scholar
  32. 31a.
    Hedén, C.-G.: A Method for Large-scale Separation of Amino Acids on Filter Paper. Nature (London) 166, 999 (1950).Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    Helferich, B.: Über das Süßmandel-Emulsin und einige verwandte Fermente. Erg. Enzymforsch. 9, 70 (1943).Google Scholar
  34. 32a.
    Hirs, C. H. W., W. H. Stein and S. Moore: Chromatography of Proteins. Ribonuclease. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 73, 1893 (1951).Google Scholar
  35. 33.
    Ingelman, B. and M. S. Halling: Some Physico-chemical Experiments on Fractions of Dextran. Ark. Kemi 1, 61 (1949/1950).Google Scholar
  36. 34.
    Jones, J. I. M. and S. E. Michael: Chromatography of Proteins. Nature (London) 165, 685 (1950).Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    Jones, T. S. G.: The Chemical Nature of “Aerosporin”. III. The Optical Configuration of the Leucine and Threonine Components. Biochemic. J. 42, LIX (1948).Google Scholar
  38. 36.
    Karrer, P. u. H. Lier: Über einen neuen Zucker aus Lichenin: Lichotriose. Helv. chim. Acta 8, 248 (1925).Google Scholar
  39. 37.
    Klotz, I. M., H. Triwush and M. Walker: The Binding of Organic Ions by Proteins, Competition Phenomena and Denaturation Effects. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 70, 2935 (1948).Google Scholar
  40. 38.
    Kraut, H. u. M. Rohdewald: Carbohydrasen. In: G.-M. Schwab, Handbuch der Katalyse, Bd. III, S. 52. Wien: Springer-Verlag. 1941.Google Scholar
  41. 39.
    Kritskii, G. A.: Prosthetic Group of Phosphorylase. Doklady Akad. Nauk, S. S. S. R. 61, 1061 (1948) [Chem. Abstr. 43, 3049 (1949)].Google Scholar
  42. 40.
    Kuhn, R.: Über Spezifität der Enzyme. II. Saccharase- und Raffinasewirkung des Invertins. Z. physiol. Chem. 125, 28 (1923).Google Scholar
  43. 41.
    Kuhn, R.: Physikalische Chemie und Kinetik der Fermentreaktionen. In: C. Oppenheimer, Die Fermente und ihre Wirkungen. Bd. I. IV. Hauptteil, S. 193. Leipzig: G. Thieme. 1924.Google Scholar
  44. 42.
    Laskowski, M. and J. B. Sumner: Crystalline Catalase from Beef Erythrocytes. Science 94, 615 (1941).Google Scholar
  45. 43.
    Lederer, E.: Progrès récents de la Chromatographie. I. Chimie organique et biologique. Paris: Hermann & Cie. 1949.Google Scholar
  46. 44.
    Leyon, H.: Salting out Adsorption of Virus. Ark. Kemi I, 313 (1949/1950).Google Scholar
  47. 45.
    Liebecq, C.: Studies of Pseudohemoglobins. III. Absorption Spectra of Pseudohemoglobin and of Different Pseudohemochromogens. Bull. Acad. roy. Méd. Belgique 8, 325 (1943) [Chem. Abstr. 41, 1005 (1947)].Google Scholar
  48. 46.
    MacDonnell, L. R., R. Jang, E. F. Jansen and H. Lineweaver: The Specificity of Pectinesterases from Several Sources with Some Notes on Purification of Orange Pectinesterase. Arch. Biochemistry 28, 260 (1950).Google Scholar
  49. 47.
    McQuarrie, E. B., A. J. Liebmann, R. G. Kluener and A. T. Venosa: Studies on Penicillinase. Arch. Biochemistry 5, 307 (1944).Google Scholar
  50. 48.
    Meyer, K. H., Ed. H. Fischer, P. Bernfeld et A. Staub: Purification et cristallisation de l’α-amylase de salive. Experientia 3, 455 (1947).Google Scholar
  51. 49.
    Meyer, K. H., Ed. H. Fischer, A. Staub et P. Bernfeld: Sur les enzymes amylolytiques. X. Isolement et cristallisation de l’α-amylase de salive humaine. Helv. chim. Acta 31, 2158 (1948).Google Scholar
  52. 50.
    Mirski, A. and E. Wertheimer: Muscle Action and Glycogen Phosphorylysis. Biochemie. J. 36, 221 (1942).Google Scholar
  53. 51.
    Mitchell, H. K., M. Gordon and F. A. Haskins: Separation of Enzymes on the Filter Paper Chromatopile. J. biol. Chemistry 180, 1071 (1949).Google Scholar
  54. 52.
    Mitchell, H. K. and F. A. Haskins: A Filter Paper “Chromatopile”. Science 110, 278 (1949).Google Scholar
  55. 53.
    Moring-Claesson, I.: Frontal Analysis Studies on the Adsorption of Crystalline Egg Albumin and its Cleavage Products. Biochim. biophys. Acta 2, 389 (1949).Google Scholar
  56. 54.
    Munro, F. L. and M. P. Munro: The Preparation of Prothrombin by Adsorption on, and Elution from, Aluminum Hydroxide. Arch. Biochemistry 15, 295 (1947).Google Scholar
  57. 55.
    Neuberger, A. and R. V. Pitt Rivers: The Hydrolysis of Glucosaminides by an Enzyme in Helix pomatia. Biochemic. J. 33, 1580 (1939).Google Scholar
  58. 56.
    Nosaka, K.: Some Microchemical Tests for the Detection of the Constituents of Blood and Urine. Microchim. Acta 1, 78 (1937) [Chem. Abstr. 31, 6271 (1937)].Google Scholar
  59. 56a.
    Oppenheimer, C.: Die Fermente und ihre Wirkungen. Suppl.-Bd. I, S. 180. Den Haag: Dr. Junk. 1936.Google Scholar
  60. 57.
    Reddi, K. K. and K. V. Giri: Purification and Separation of the Two Thiaminases in Fresh Water Mussel (Lamellidens Marginalis). Enzymologia 13, 281 (1948/1949).Google Scholar
  61. 58.
    Riley, V. T.: Application of Chromatography to Segregation Studies of the Agent of Chicken Tumor. I. (Rous Sarcoma Virus). Science 107, 573 (1948).Google Scholar
  62. 59.
    Riley, V. T.: Chromatographic Studies on the Separation of the Virus from Chicken Tumor. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. (in press).Google Scholar
  63. 60.
    Riley, V. T., M. L. Hesselbach, S. Fiala, M. W. Woods and D. Burk: Application of Chromatography to the Separation of Subcellular, Enzymatically Active Granules. Science 109, 361 (1949).Google Scholar
  64. 61.
    Riviere, C., G. Gautron et M. Thely: Chromatographie et ioduration artificielle de 1a thyroglobuline. Bull. Soc. Chim. biol. (Paris) 29, 600 (1947).Google Scholar
  65. 62.
    Rohdewald, M. and L. Zechmeister: The Detection of Enzymes by the Chromatographic Brush Method. II. Enzymologia (in press).Google Scholar
  66. 63.
    Sastri, B. N. u. M. Sreenivasaya: Entdeckung von Enzymen durch „Fleck“-Proben. Mikrochem. 14, 159 (1933/1934).Google Scholar
  67. 64.
    Schöberl, A. u. P. Rambacher: Über die Reinigung des Labfermentes durch chromatographische Adsorption. Biochem. Z. 305, 223 (1940).Google Scholar
  68. 65.
    Schormüller, J.: Adsorption of Crystalline Trypsin by Various Adsorbents. Z. Lebensm.-Untersuch, u. -Forsch. 88, 576 (1948) [Chem. Abstr. 43, 3864 (1949)].Google Scholar
  69. 66.
    Schwerdt, C. E.: Chromatography of Hemoglobin and Serum Proteins. Thesis, Stanford Univ. 1940.Google Scholar
  70. 67.
    Schwimmer, S. and A. K. Balls: Isolation and Properties of Crystalline α-Amylase from Germinated Barley. J. biol. Chem. 179, 1063 (1949).Google Scholar
  71. 68.
    Schwimmer, S. and A. K. Balls: Starches and their Derivatives as Adsorbents for Malt α-Amylase. J. biol. Chem. 180, 883 (1949).Google Scholar
  72. 69.
    Shapiro, B. and E. Wertheimer: Phosphorolysis and Synthesis of Glycogen in Animal Tissues. Biochemie. J. 37, 397 (1943).Google Scholar
  73. 70.
    Shepard, Ch. C. and A. Tiselius: The Chromatography of Proteins. The Effect of Salt Concentration and pH on the Adsorption of Proteins to Silica Gel. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 7, 275 (1949).Google Scholar
  74. 71.
    Simonart, P. et K.-Y. Chow: Chromatographie sur papier appliquée à des enzymes. Bull. Soc. chim. Belgique 59, 417 (1950).Google Scholar
  75. 72.
    Singer, Th. P. and E. B. Kearneyl: The L-Aminooxidases of Snake Venom. II. Isolation and Characterisation of Homogeneous L-Aminoacid Oxidase. Arch. Biochemistry 29, 190 (1950).Google Scholar
  76. 73.
    Sober, H. A., G. Kegeles and F. J. Gutter: Chromatographic Analysis of a Mixture of Proteins from Egg White. Science 110, 564 (1949).Google Scholar
  77. 74.
    Spies, J. R., E. J. Coulson, H. S. Bernton and H. Stevens: The Chemistry of Allergens. II. Isolation and Properties of an Active Protein Component of Cottonseed. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 62, 1420 (1940).Google Scholar
  78. 75.
    Strain, H. H.: Chromatographic Adsorption Analysis. 2nd printing. New York: Interscience Publ. 1945.Google Scholar
  79. 76.
    Sumner, J. B., A. L. Dounce and V. L. Frampton: Catalase. III. J. biol. Chemistry 136, 343 (1940).Google Scholar
  80. 77.
    Sumner, J. B., P. S. Krishnan and E. B. Sisler: An Improved Method for the Preparation of Coenzyme I. Arch. Biochemistry 12, 19 (1947).Google Scholar
  81. 78.
    Sumner, J. B. and G. F. Somers: Chemistry and Methods of Enzymes. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press. 1947.Google Scholar
  82. 79.
    Talboys, P. W.: Use of “Amberlite IRC-50” for the Partial Purification of a Bacterial Pectinase. Nature (London) 166, 1077 (1950).Google Scholar
  83. 80.
    Tiselius, A.: Adsorption Analysis of Amino Acids and Peptides. Ark. Kem., Mineral. Geol. 15 B, No. 6 (1941).Google Scholar
  84. 81.
    Tiselius, A.: Adsorption Separation by Salting Out. Ark. Kem., Mineral. Geol. 26 B, No. 1 (1948).Google Scholar
  85. 82.
    Tiselius, A.: Some Recent Trends in Biochemistry. Chem. Engng. News 27, 1041 (1949).Google Scholar
  86. 83.
    Tiselius, A.: Elektrophorese und Adsorptionsanalyse als Hilfsmittel zur Untersuchung hochmolekularer Stoffe und ihrer Zerfallsprodukte. Naturwiss. 37, 25 (1950).Google Scholar
  87. 84.
    Tóth, G. and J. Bársony: Über die Chromatographie der Tannase. I. Enzymologia 11, 19 (1943).Google Scholar
  88. 85.
    Turba, F.: Chromatographische Methoden in der Protein-Chemie. Z. Vit.-, Horm.- u. Fermentforsch. 2, 49 (1948/1949).Google Scholar
  89. 86.
    Turba, F. u. H. J. Enenkel: Elektrophorese von Proteinen auf Filtrierpapier. Naturwiss. 37, 93 (1950).Google Scholar
  90. 87.
    Veibel, S., J. Wangel and G. Östrup: On the Difference Between ß-Gluco-sidase and ß-Galactosidase. Biochim. biophys. Acta 2, 126 (1947).Google Scholar
  91. 88.
    Waldschmidt-Leitz, E. u. F. Turba: Verfahren der Trennung von Peptidgemischen. J. prakt. Chem. 156, 55 (1940).Google Scholar
  92. 89.
    Wallenfels, K. u. E. von Pechmann: Über die Trennung von Enzymgemischen durch Elektrophorese in Filtrierpapier. Angew. Chem. 63, 44 (1951).Google Scholar
  93. 90.
    Weidenhagen, R.: Spezifität und Wirkungsmechanismus der Carbohydrasen. Erg. Enzymforsch, 1, 168 (1932).Google Scholar
  94. 91.
    Westphal, U., P. Gedigk u. F. Meyer: Über eine chromatographische Methode zur Characterisierung von Serumeiweiß. Z. physiol. Chem. 285, 36 (1950).Google Scholar
  95. 92.
    Weygand, F. u. L. Birkofer Über die Reindarstellung von „altem“ gelbem Ferment aus Hefe und eine neue Methode zur reversiblen Spaltung. Z. physiol. Chem. 261, 172 (1939).Google Scholar
  96. 93.
    Wieland, Th. u. L. Wirth: Retentionsanalyse von Papierelektropherogrammen natürlicher Proteingemische. Angew. Chem. 62, 473 (1950).Google Scholar
  97. 94.
    Williams, R. J. and H. Kirby: Paper Chromatography Using Capillary Ascent. Science 107, 481 (1948).Google Scholar
  98. 95.
    Williams, T. I.: An Introduction to Chromatography. London: Blackie & Son. 1946. Brooklyn: Chem. Publ. Co. 1947.Google Scholar
  99. 96.
    Willstätter, R.: Über Isolierung von Enzymen. Ber. dtsch. chem. Ges. 55, 3601 (1922).Google Scholar
  100. 97.
    Willstätter, R.: Bemerkungen zur Geschichte der Enzymadsorption. In: Untersuchungen über Enzyme, Bd. I, S. 66. Berlin: Springer. 1928.Google Scholar
  101. 98.
    Willstätter, R., H. Kraut u. O. Erbacher: Über isomere Hydrogele der Tonerde. VII. Mitt. über Hydrate und Hydrogele. Ber. dtsch. chem. Ges. 58, 2448 (1925).Google Scholar
  102. 99.
    Willstätter, R., H. Kraut u. O. Erbacher: Über ein Tonerde-Gel von der Formel AlO • OH. VIII. Mitt. über Hydrate und Hydrogele. Ber. dtsch. chem. Ges. 58, 2458 (1925).Google Scholar
  103. 100.
    Willstätter, R., R. Kuhn u. H. Sobotka: Über die relative Spezifität der Hefemaltase. Z. physiol. Chem. 134, 224 (1924).Google Scholar
  104. 101.
    Yanofsky, Ch., E. Wasserman and D. M. Bonner: Large Scale Paper Chromatography. Science 111, 61 (1950).Google Scholar
  105. 102.
    Young, J. H. and R. J. Hartman: Adsorption of Pancreatic Enzymes. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 48, 79 (1939).Google Scholar
  106. 103.
    Zechmeister, L.: Progress in Chromatography 1938–1947. London: Chapman & Hall. 1950. New York: J. Wiley. 1951.Google Scholar
  107. 104.
    Zechmeister, L.: Paper Disk Columns in Glass Chromatographic Tubes. Science 113, 35 (1951).Google Scholar
  108. 105.
    Zechmeister, L. and L. Cholnoky: Principles and Practice of Chromatography. London: Chapman & Hall. New York: J. Wiley. 3rd impr. 1950.Google Scholar
  109. 106.
    Zechmeister, L., L. Cholnoky et E. Ujhelyi: Contribution à 1a Chromatographie des substances incolores. Bull. Soc. Chim. biol. (Paris) 18, 1885 (1936).Google Scholar
  110. 107.
    Zechmeister, L. and M. Rohdewald: The Detection of Enzymes by the Chromatographic Brush Method. I. Enzymologia 13, 388 (1949).Google Scholar
  111. 108.
    Zechmeister, L. u. G. Tóth: Chromatographie der in der Chitinreihe wirksamen Enzyme des Emulsins. Enzymologia 7, 165 (1939).Google Scholar
  112. 109.
    Zechmeister, L., G. Tóth u. M. Bálint: Über die chromatographische Trennung einiger Enzyme des Emulsins. Enzymologia 5, 302 (1938).Google Scholar
  113. 110.
    Zechmeister, L., G. Tóth, P. Fürth u. J. Barsony: Über die chromatographische Trennbarkeit einiger ß-Glucosidasen. Enzymologia 9, 155 (1940).Google Scholar
  114. 111.
    Zechmeister, L., G. Tóth u. É, Vajda: Chromatographie der in der Chitinreihe wirksamen Enzyme der Weinbergschnecke (Helix pomatia). Enzymologia 7, 170 (1939).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wien · Springer-Verlag 1951

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Zechmeister
    • 1
  • M. Rohdewald
    • 2
  1. 1.PasadenaUSA
  2. 2.BonnGermany

Personalised recommendations